Featured post

“Gay people can live anywhere,” except in New York City

Hola. I have no intention of writing about every anti-Queer incident that happens against the now-dead Queer Community (who could keep up with that?!), but I chose to write about these incidents because of that “Gay people can live anywhere” slogan/nonsense that we were hearing around here in San Francisco’s Castro awhile back. I haven’t heard or read that in some time. Well, one rarely hears anyone speaking anymore because most people are glued to their phones and in their phone trance. Maybe those “Gay people can live anywhere” idiots vacated The City to give that delusion a try (good luck with that!), or they came to their senses and came out of their wishful-thinking delusions.

Some years ago — after Gay Marriage became legal here in The Cesspool/the shithole US — gullible Queers were moving out of The Castro as well as The City and we kept hearing: “We’re moving because gay people can now live anywhere.” (Sigh, roll eyes) I thought to myself but didn’t ask these gullible people because I didn’t want to get into an argument with them: What drugs are you on that causes you to think that, “Gay people can now live anywhere?” These gullible Queers had been brainwashed with that same nonsense.

These incidents I’m writing about here are most assuredly a sign of the times and the anti-Queer atmosphere in this country set by the orange nazi and his despicable and corrupt regime. And I don’t see the useless and corrupt right-wing Democratic Party saying a word. The same goes for the other corrupt right-wing party. (They are both corporate basura).

A cab driver in New York City told two passengers that he “doesn’t drive gays.” Now keep in mind this happened in Manhattan with its Queer history, and not some small hick town where one might expect this to happen. This incident came a few days after a lesbian couple in Manhattan as well got kicked out of an Über driver’s vehicle because they were kissing.

NBC News in NYC reported this story. Ryan Smith and a friend were a passenger in a cab in Manhattan and they said they were “shocked” when their driver interrupted the conversation they were having to ask them if they were gay. (You mean the driver didn’t say “LGBT” like everyone has been brainwashed to say?) They didn’t answer the driver, so he persisted and asked again: “Are you a gay man?” Ryan said “Yes, I am.” The driver said: “I don’t drive gays.” Ryan said he was “shocked.” (You shouldn’t be shocked Ryan, if you’ve been paying attention to what is happening here in the shithole US. Too busy glued to that phone of yours?)

Then, during the same week two lesbians were kicked out of an Über driver’s vehicle because of their “short kiss” in the backseat. Question: Why is anyone riding in Über vehicles to begin with considering all the bad publicity that corporation has received? What is wrong with people today? The Über driver told the lesbian couple that their kiss was “illegal,” and then when they told him it wasn’t, he said “it’s disrespectful.” “Disrespectful” to whom? A homophobe? We can all be assured that he wouldn’t have responded that way if they were a breeder/straight couple in a full passionate make-out scene to the point of fucking in the back seat. I suspect that would have been perfectly acceptable with him and he would have enjoyed watching that through his rear-view mirror, and even jacked off to it! The lesbian couple rightly reported him and this Über driver lost his cab licence over the incident. The New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission suspended his licence. But the way things work these days, he’ll probably get his licence back somehow and very soon. Just make a call to la casa blanca/the white house. Tell them the story. That’s something the orange nazi or his vehemently anti-gay sidekick would gladly rectify and help him out with to get his licence back, out of bullying revenge against the lesbians.

Anyone surprised by these incidents in Manhattan? One shouldn’t be, if one has been paying attention.

A few years ago we were told by the conservatives around San Francisco’s Castro — as they were sanitising the former Gay Mecca — that “Gay people can live anywhere now; gay is now mainstream; there’s no need for gay meccas anymore.” It was the owner of Café Fl*re who said that during the same time that he was one of the lead supporters of the anti-homeless sit-lie law. And to think I used to spend time hanging out in his café giving that asshole business. At the time, I described his comments as ludicrous, and pointed out that Queer people can’t even live in the closet anywhere.

Well, if you can’t live in New York City (of all places!) as a Queer person, where can you live?!

When is the now-dead Queer Community going to get off their fucking phones and realise what is going on in this cesspool of a country? Because we are very quickly headed back decades, people. Wake the fuck up! But I’m a realist. I know that’s not going to happen. Things will continue as they are. The world has a major, major distraction today. It’s called the Adult Pacifier to keep The People constantly entertained and distracted from what really matters. The dopamine-phone addiction is the one major difference today that we did not have during the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement. During the Movement, one did not see thousands and thousands of people paralysed on the sidewalk hunched over staring at a box in their hand unable to move, talk or even look up. We didn’t have this awful distraction “back in the day.”

One thing: Lesbians don’t take any shit from anybody as you’ll see in this video because they too have been smashed to the curb too many times. Gay guys didn’t used to take any shit from anybody. But that was then. Today is different. Their pilot light is completely snuffed out. Gay guys have mostly become phone-addicted bots. They are mostly pro-Establishment, cop-supporting, conformist conservatives with their “Conform, Obey!” mentality. They are the opposite of who they were as people. They are more worried about getting the latest app than anything happening to the Queer Community in the news today. The trans folk seem to be the only people doing anything and they are all out there alone in fighting the bathroom bill and other issues, and they are losing. Remember when the trans activist questioned Obama and was not supported by any of the Queers in that room? Instead, all of the pro-Establishment, brainwashed Democratic partisan Queers in that room supported their messiah and saviour neocon Obama (because of that D next to his name; you’re never supposed to disagree with or take on anyone from your own partisan “team”). What a disgusting sight! Where are the gay men, again? Silent. They appear to be quiet comfortable going back to the 1940s. The straight white men are fighting to become nazis. The straight white women are fighting to become bougi, perfect-looking model types in Stiletto heels.

Mi amigo/My friend asked: When is the dead Gay Community going to get back together again and start fighting this shit all over again? When one forgets ones history, one is doomed to repeat it. And we’re not going to fucking Oklahoma — fuck that shit — to start a Gay Mecca. A new Gay Mecca better be on the Left Coast somewhere.

Off topic but one of my pet peeves: Why does this disreputable Über corporation sanitise the Deutsch/German word Über by removing the umlaut? BTW, Über means about, on, over, or via. Do they remove the umlaut in Deutschland/Germany too? How disrespectful. Well probably, because Über is based in the Tech Capital of San Francisco, and even though many world languages are spoken here, the English language loves to disrespect and sanitise the other world languages. But Über is a Deutsch/German word no matter what language you put it in so it should remain authentic — with the umlaut (Ü) — to its original language. The same goes for any other world language that is used in an English language sentence. México is another example. The accent over the “é” in México should be retained in all English language sentences because México is an español language word. It’s not an English word. Chau.—el barrio rosa

Here is the video of the lesbians and their encounter with the homophobic Über driver:


Gay “Assimilation:” Back to the 1950s

It’s all about the money

Just because someone is Queer or Black or Asian or Latino or an indigenous person of the Américas or a Woman or Trans or of any other minority group who has never had an opportunity at public office, that does not at all mean that the minority person is going to be a good or outstanding person in office. Not at all. From what I’ve observed, most of them have turned out to be worse — and by that I mean more conservative — than the white trash males that preceded them, frankly. It’s all about the dinero/money regardless of one’s sexual orientation, gender or ethnic group. Those things are just the façade.

Identity Politics?

Hola a todos. During the Gay Mecca decades, I think “the first openly gay candidate” really meant something positive, as in the case of Harvey Milk being elected to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.

But I have to say that not too long after Milk, I’ve seen minority candidates riding on “the first [fill in blank] candidate” for public office and for the most part they’ve been nothing special, if not worse than what we had before.

I’ve reached my fatigue level with “the first [fill in blank]” candidates, which corporate (gay) rags often like to go on about. I’m talking about “the first openly-gay candidate.” Or “the first Black candidate” or “the first Black mayor” or “the first Black Woman mayor” (which San Francisco is now experiencing; well she’ll be the puppet mayor of her corporate owners), or “the first Asian candidate” or “the first woman candidate” or “the first Latino candidate.” Or “the first openly HIV-positive candidate.” Is “the first openly HIV-positive candidate” intended as a sympathy run?

In San Francisco, I remember seeing this ridiculous headline: “In historical move, mayor appoints first openly HIV-positive supervisor.” Oh please! What about “the first candidate with openly chronic colds?” What about the “first candidate with openly chronic diarrhea? Surely that too would be a sympathy run! But in nearly every instance I can think of since this nonsense began, “the first [fill in the blank] candidate” turned out to be just as bad or worse than the straight white political trash preceding them. These “first” candidates fulfilled a conservative agenda working for their corporate owners just like the political basura preceding them.

We had “the first Asian mayor” in San Francisco and he was a disaster. His policies helped to ruin this City — making San Francisco the Tech Capital and kicked out the majority of the Old City residents including much of the Gay Community — although the conservatives adored him, rewrote history and bestowed Sainthood Status on him when he died.

Obama was “the first Black president” and overall he turned out to be worse than the white guy before him, illegitimate George W Bush. One example: Those who paid close attention during his regime — rather than going into a self-induced coma for 8 years merely because of that D next to his name — know that Obama greatly expanded the Bush/Cheney neocon agenda, and Mr Nobel Peace Prize Obama left office with 8-9 wars (I lost count) in progress. The so-called “gay community” remained absolutely silent and never protested any of Obama’s wars or his other neocon despicable policies — because to them wars are perfectly okay if it’s a Democrat leading it — or anything else he did because of that D next to their messiah Obama’s name. Apparently the “gay community” didn’t care how many gay people Obama’s wars killed. Or do they live under the illusion that wars only kill breeders? The same gay hypocrites did protest Bush’s wars. Why? Because Bush had that R (for Republican) next to his name. That makes a difference, you ask? Of course it does to brainwashed partisans, both D and R. Another political disaster: Openly-gay Scott Penis (Mr PrEP). Also, it was one of the Asian SF supervisors who cast the deciding vote in favour of San Francisco’s city-wide nudity ban because of a few naked guys on the odd occasion in The Castro. Then, most recently, we have the “first openly gay appointee” of the orange nazi’s regime. “Openly gay US ambassador to Deutschland/Germany makes Republican history. Richard Grenell is the highest ranking openly gay official ever in a Republican regime according to the current Log Cabin Republican’s president. From what I can tell, this guy is a gay nazi. And consequently there are now calls to expel him from Deutschland after he pledged to “empower the far right across Europe.” Is that what you would expect from a gay guy? See what I mean? “If people like U.S. ambassador Richard Grenell believe they can dictate like a lord of the manor who rules in Europe and who doesn’t, they can no longer remain in Germany as a diplomat.”

So I’ve had it up to here with this “first [fill in blank] candidate” caca. It’s technically called identity politics.

I’ve also learned that most of the disciples and followers who worship “the first [fill in blank]” candidates do not pay attention to what they do in office. So these disciples/voters of these candidates serve as mindless cheerleaders for them no matter what they do and no matter how heinous their despicable policies. Some people have no standards.

If one believes the June 2018 s-election results in San Francisco to be legitimate, of those who voted in the last s-election in San Francisco, The City elected “the first Black Woman mayor.” Her name is London Breed. She was the board president of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. Many people are jumping up and down in celebration over this puppet mayor. Why? Because she, through the real mayor, billionaire and Angel Investor Ron Conway, is going to give the data-mining and predatory Tech Industrial Complex that owns San Francisco everything and anything they want since they heavily supported her. I’m afraid I don’t see that as anything to be celebrated.

Just because someone has a vagina (or penis) and is of a certain skin pigmentation, that person can be just as bad or even worse than what we’ve had before. Their gender and skin colour doesn’t make them any more special, unique or genuinely progressive than anybody else. I used to think it did — although I don’t remember where I got that thinking from — because the thinking was “minorities have been put down for so long that they in office will correct systemic problems by being genuinely progressive in office.” I’ve since learned that that’s absolute bull shit thinking. From my experience and from what I’ve seen, if anything, these candidates take a more conservative approach.

I suspect London Breed, the new puppet mayor of San Francisco — who’s being celebrated by her gullible supporters as “the first Black and second Woman mayor of San Francisco” — will turn out to be like (or worse than!) all the others. And the “first Asian mayor” of San Francisco was a disaster for this City. He was the conservative — charading as “a moderate” — empty puppet of the same billionaire Angel Investor that the “first Black Woman mayor” will be serving as. And that’s because the Tech Industrial Complex heavily funded committees supporting Ms Breed. So who do you think she’ll be working for? Hmmmmmmmmmm? Care to take a guess? I’ve already seen a picture of the two standing together and she looks delighted to be standing next to the real mayor, Mr Billionaire. So I suspect the continued shift-to-the-right in San Francisco will remain in place.

So I think it’s time that we admit it, shall we? Humans are humans regardless of their skin pigmentation, their sexual orientation, or beliefs, or their working for billionaires and their corporate owners. It’s all about the money.

With the exception to that being fundamentalists, the far-right, fascists, nazis and fake-Christians. To them, it’s about another agenda. Chau.—el barrio rosa

A second flagpole for the Harvey Milk Plaza?

I thought it was odd that The Castro neighbourhood that was once saturated with Scott Penis campaign signs during at least two election cycles was now saturated with Rafael Mandelman signs (as of junio/June 2018). WTF was that about? How could that be possible when The Castro barrio/neighbourhood, if anything, is now more conservative and conformist than it was? But after some research while writing this article, I now know the reason why.

Hola a todos. For years, the children in adult bodies in San Francisco’s Castro — specifically the conservative group of people on an authoritarian power trip known as the Castro merchants, as well as some self-entitled conservative homeowners — have behaved extremely poorly. Like small children in a sandbox. They ought to be ashamed by their behaviour over the years, although I doubt they are. Some people have no standards. And despite some people’s chronological age, they never mature mentally to adulthood unfortunately. The Castro merchants are an example of that. And despite their living in a major US cities (San Francisco), these Castro merchants and homeowners come with a rather provincial and prudish mentality.

Over the years these merchant basura have argued over, fought over, squabbled over, lied and played their septic, childishly immature and conservative politics with members of the Queer Community over the flagpole at Harvey Milk Plaza (at Castro and Market Streets) which flies a large Rainbow Flag. All of this dysfunction over a flag pole? Yes, I’m afraid so. Something so trivial really. There’s nothing else going on in their pathetic lives in their stores than to be obsessed and fixated with a flag pole at the Milk Plaza? Apparently not.

The last pronouncement from these merchant pendejos came in the style of what could best be described as a Congressional Declaration that no other flag but the Rainbow Flag would ever fly on this flag pole at Harvey Milk Plaza. Who do these merchant basura think they are to make such a grandiose decision about a flag pole that’s not on their property? Their mentality is that of the orange nazi: Loco/a, dictatorial and authoritarian. They also behave as if they’re afraid of their own shadow. This pronouncement from them came right after the Transgender flag was flown there for (I think it was) a 24-hour period. Any correlation between the two? Does one detect some anti-trans feelings among this septic group of elitist conservative merchant basura on their childish power trip?

As I’ve written many times before, but for the purpose of any new readers: These days the Rainbow Flag in Milk Plaza is solely displayed for tourist purposes because The Castro has been thoroughly sanitised of its former Gay Mecca status with the help of these conservative merchant basura. Today, The Castro is a Breeder Mecca with fleets of black baby strollers being pushed by Millennial females wearing their conformist all-black or black and grey clothing (no matter how hot it is outside) with their screaming babies/children. Today’s Castro is nothing like the former Gay Mecca. The Castro has been thoroughly stripped of its Gay Mecca character and uniqueness with the help of these conservative merchants. If one removed the Rainbow Flags, today’s Castro would look like any other neighbourhood in The City. The breeder Marina comes to mind.

From what I remember when this topic came up before, the flagpole at Harvey Milk Plaza is on public property. It’s not on anyone’s private property; it’s not on the property of any of these busy-bodied merchants. So why have these pendejos merchants controlled it? These merchants seem to think the flag pole is on the top of their own store. It’s an example of out-of-control conservative basura on a power trip, although these merchants may lie and call themselves “a liberal” or “a progressive.” These days, people call themselves anything. It doesn’t have to be based in reality.

It seems to me that if anyone should control this flag pole at Milk Plaza, it would be the City and County of San Francisco, not these busy-bodied store owners. As they say in México, I’d like to say this to these merchants: ¡Vete a la chingada! Do we understand each other, los pendejos?

These busy-bodied merchants have taken it upon themselves to control this flag pole for years. They have ramrodded it and possessively owned-controlled it. Because of this and other conservative politics in The Castro, I can’t stand most of the Castro merchants today and I’m not one of their customers. The sooner they go out of business, the better, is how I feel about them. They have helped ruin The Castro.

But not all merchants in The Castro are members of this corrupt and childishly conservative clique. The best adult sex store and the best looking one in The Castro, Rock Hard, is not part of this corrupt and domineering merchants group to my knowledge. From what I know and have observed about Rock Hard, they have opposed the sanitising of The Castro. Over the years, they have unfortunately been bullied by the SFPD over their window displays by the same type of prudes who run some of these stores. The cops received calls from prudish breeder and prudish gay families in The Castro who complained that they didn’t want their children to see the sex images on some video covers displayed in Rock Hard’s window. There’s an easy solution to that: Don’t show your children RH’s window, los pendejos. It’s sad that many people become prudes when they become parents. They seem to forget their own past. (Related: Sexual Freedom and Revolution). So, Rock Hard was forced to put white stickers over their gay video covers (dick and ass images specifically) displayed in their window. But something tells me that if Rock Hard had featured nothing but straight videos, they would not be required to put white stickers over pussy, ass or boob images. Just gay dick and ass shots. And these conservative breeder and gay families with children have been part of the conservative agenda to sanitise and change The Castro to the way they want it: into a Breeder Mecca. If these people didn’t like The Castro of the Gay Mecca years, why the fuck did they move here? Why didn’t they move to another neighbourhood in The City without any adult sex stores? Well, because people like that come with a conservative right-wing agenda and they relish being an asshole about it.

FYI: The last time I looked, Urban Flowers is not a member of this corrupt merchants group either. So one can support both Rock Hard and Urban Flowers.

In this recent s-election (junio/June 2018; California primary), Rafael Mandelman won the seat (district 8) on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors that conservative Scott Penis unfortunately held for 8 years.

Sometime ago, I stopped paying close attention to San Francisco politics for my own health and sanity, because I rarely agree with what goes on around here politically. So I paid little attention to this past s-election and the campaigning that led up to it.

I do remember the first time Rafael ran for supervisor in San Francisco. He came off to me as a wet doily frankly. He spoke in political clichés, and acted as if he were somewhat intimidated by Scott Penis. Rafael was considered “a progressive” but I noticed back then that he seemed to run from the word progressive when interviewed. Not a good sign. Some people call themselves “progressives” even when they’re not. They’re progressive in name-only. They’re merely Establishment Democrats supporting their corrupt, imperialistic right-wing Democratic Party which often serves as employees of the other corrupt, imperialistic right-wing party: the Republican Party.

It occurred to me the other night following the s-election in California, now that district 8 in San Francisco has a new and allegedly “progressive” supervisor with Rafael Mandelman, why not have a second flag pole installed near the current one and fly various pro-Gay flags there, including the beautiful trans flag?

Upon reflection, I don’t know why I thought that would be a good idea since the dead Queer Community has put all of these flags — Rainbow Flag, Bear Flag, Leather Flag, Trans Flag, et al — back in the closet as I wrote about in this article. So, very few people here would have any interest in any other flag flying there. I think that what remains of the dead and seemingly back-in-the-closet Queer Community here in San Francisco would respond with apathy to the whole idea of a second flag being flown in HMP. Couldn’t care less. I also think that most of what little remains here of the conservative Queer Community wouldn’t say anything if they took the big Rainbow Flag down tomorrow. Their response: “The Rainbow Flag is so passé. It’s served its purpose. Been there. Done that. Just as well that they take it down.”

We shall see how genuinely progressive Rafael turns out to be. I’m not holding my breath. Or to climb The Establishment corporate ladder, will he turn out to be another fake-progressive wet doily and Establishment ass-eater (your typical Establishment Democrat, in other words) in the mold of Scott Penis?

Well, after further research, I’m beginning to get a clue on the answer to that and this is not looking good:

I find it curious that the voters went from conservative Scott Penis to so-called “progressive” Rafael. How on Earth is that possible? Or did these conservative voters who gave us eight years of that awful prude Scott Penis realise what a dismal place he helped turn The Castro into? I saw nothing change for the positive under his successor who served a short term on the Board after being appointed by the now-dead former mayor.

I already have one peeve with Rafael. Stop calling conservative voters “moderates.” That is newspeak. He said this on s-election night:

“These are voters who tend to be among the more moderate in the district, and they appear to have broken pretty significantly for me,” he said. “It does appear that I’m winning. … It looks like I was just elected supervisor.”

In San Francisco, a “moderate” is code language for a conservative. I learned that from longtime locals years ago. I think that’s common knowledge in San Francisco. What exactly do these politicians and others have to do or say to be called what they are: conservatives? None of them are called conservatives in San Francisco. They call themselves “moderates.” Then the corporate media dutifully regurgitate that and call them all “moderates.” Most of the voters having been brainwashed by the corporate media also call these conservative trash “moderates.” So I cringe every time I hear these conservative politicians and voters mislabeled as “moderates.” It’s newspeak and a way of trying to sanitise and hide their often conservative and draconian agenda. Some of us are not fooled by it.

Trying to be like Scott Penis? WTF?

After additional research while writing this article, I now understand why voters chose Rafael. According to one source I read, during the campaign Mandelman cast himself in the mold of Scott Penis. WTF? Well there you go! The article referenced, “he takes phones calls and rides Muni like his constituents.” A genuine progressive would not cast himself in the mold of Scott Penis or any conservative. A genuine progressive would run from conservative Scott Penis’s record and never mention his name! Was Rafael trying to ride on the coattails of The Holy and Indivisible Trinity, as I’ve often called Scott Penis? That’s how Scott Penis’s disciples saw him: as a conservative god who could do no wrong. I saw his rabid supporters around here especially in his first term stop just short of genuflecting to him on the sidewalk. I heard some of his conservative redneck supporters say to him, “How’re you doing my boy?; you’re doing a great job!” “My boy?” I honestly think some of his conservative supporters had a father-son sexual head trip going on with him, in part, because at that time he looked very young/boyish. He doesn’t now.

Then, I read that Rafael would consider building housing on the parking lot at Glen Park BART Station and the Safeway lot at Market and Church streets. One problem with that is that the word affordable (as in affordable housing) was missing. The space at Safeway is perfect for a gigantic complex of bougi and elitist Luxury Designer Condos (Dahling) for the Millennial basura and super-wealthy.

Then, Rafael’s endorsements included the Democratic Party Establishment. Get this: He was also endorsed by the president of the conservative Castro merchants, and I should point out that they adored their messiah Scott Penis (who would fit in very nicely with the Log Cabin Republicans). Rafael was also endorsed by the conservative Alice Club. They always endorse conservative Scott Penis. Rafael also received the endorsement of one of the major corporate newspapers in San Francisco known for their conservative political positions. So to have conservative organisations endorsing a so-called “progressive” you know something is wrong and suspect.

It would appear that Rafael has “shifted to the right” — of course he would deny that as they all do — in order to get elected and to get endorsed by these traditionally conservative groups.

Note: The asterisked paragraphs below were written before I saw Rafael’s endorsements, such as from the merchants’ group, meaning I don’t expect any of my proposals or suggestions to ever happen:

*As for a second flag pole, I can hear some idiot saying “it’s not good to have multiple flag poles together, you can’t do that.” Really? The United Nations doesn’t seem to have any problem with that arrangement, where this image shows roughly 25 flag poles together outside their headquarters in NYC. Many government buildings have multiple flag poles next to each other.

*But above all, I suggest that Rafael not consult with the omnipotent, busy-bodied Castro merchants about this proposed new flag pole whatsoever. Who cares what los pendejos think? We already know what they think because they’ve been telling us for years, and some of them are going out of business anyway, which they deserve to do. We can use their empty stores for inexpensive affordable housing which there is a grave shortage of in San Francisco. (Over $2,000 dollars for a studio apartment in the Tenderloin. Insanity!) Has anyone looked around here lately and seen the dismal state of things in The Castro? Retail is quickly going out of business.

BTW, mi amigo/my friend was over in Marin County the other day and he had to go to a mall with a relative. He said that one-third of the mall was empty with closed stores.

As I pointed out in this article, the breeders seem to have hijacked the Rainbow Flag (they love making out under it), so isn’t it a time that we Queers get our own flag pole not controlled by conservative merchant basura? I think this disreputable merchant group is mainly headed by that conservative hardware store which shall remain nameless.

During the former Gay Mecca years, various flags were displayed on the Milk Plaza flag pole, such as the leather flag, the bear flag, and the trans flag. The trans flag flown there was very pretty. I heard it was loaned to them.

The Castro merchant pendejos said that the intention of the person originally responsible for the Harvey Milk flag pole said that only the Rainbow Flag should fly there. I don’t really give a damn what his original intention was. What did he have against the other Queer flags? I’m not sure they existed at the time that the original flag pole was installed. And furthermore, this is about a flag pole, not a musical composition where one hopefully adheres to the wishes of the composer. Who cares what this guy thinks? He doesn’t even live here. As I recall, he lives in New York City, if he’s still alive.

A new flag pole would have nothing to do with him or his wishes. It could be called the Queer or Gay People’s Flag Pole in Harvey Milk Plaza, and if we want to fly a trans flag, we will fly it, thank you very much. ¡Vete a la chingada, merchants group!

I mentioned how these prude merchants have helped sanitise the neighourhood. The Castro has a long history of nudity yet these merchant have whined about the few naked guys in The Castro, which led to a city-wide nudity ban authored by openly-gay prude Scott Penis. (BTW, I did see four of the original naked guys recently — yes they were naked — up near Castro and 19th Streets.) As I recall it was the owner of that hardware store who said, “I don’t want my grand daughter seeing naked guys on her way to and from school” or words to that effect. Then move, perra! No one is forcing you or your grand daughter to live here. It seems that your prudish conservative self would perhaps be much more comfortable in Topeka Kansas, for example, next to a Southern Baptist Church. And one’s granddaughter wouldn’t think anything of the few naked guys — if she even see them! — if she hadn’t been brainwashed with some prudish conservative thinking that seeing the naked human body is a bad thing or “evil.” This store owner and granddaughter must be absolutely repulsed when they see their own naked bodies. But this was all part of the sanitising The Castro for the breeders.

*Rafael should also ignore that conservative perra that runs that Castro Benefit District racket. Does that piece of conservative work still live in Pacifica while receiving an extremely generous salary for continuing to help ruin The Castro when la perra doesn’t even live here?

*I’m well aware that the conservative merchants would come up with a long list of why it’s not possible or not a good idea to install a second flag pole. They are the most negative of people. They will cite the MUNI wires even though there’s been no problem with the current flag and the wires. The wires are not even used anymore. But these basura would have to come up with something to oppose this idea of a second flag pole.

*Since that land is public, is it not possible for Rafael to accomplish this rather quickly? There’s no need for any useless committees of busy-bodied conservatives residents or waste-of-time hearings or drawing up ridiculous plans costing The City millions of dollars and taking years to accomplish. It’s a basic flag pole we’re talking about here like the one that’s there. Put the damn thing up. It doesn’t take up any more space than 4 square inches. Two stop signs take up more space than that! How difficult is that? Answer: As difficult as the nay-sayer pendejos in The Castro want it to be. Getting anything positive done around here is like a root canal.

Previously, the closed-minded conservatives among us said that anyone and everyone would want to put a flag up there on the original flag pole. From the “What If” Fear Crowd: Someone afraid of their own shadow said what if the nazis want to put their flag up there. There are nazis around here? Where? But that’s an example of the type of extreme thinking and extreme comment that one has come to expect around here from these basura who oppose anything positive. Some nut said what if the Westboro Baptist Church want to fly their flag up there. And why — do tell — would they be interested in a flag pole in San Francisco when they’re in Topeka Kansas? They’re not the brightest bunch. Do they even know where San Francisco is, or how to get here? Could they find us on a map? Do they believe in maps? I deal with “What is” and not “What if” because the latter leads to all kinds of lunatic speculation and ideas. I deal with things as they come.

*Has one never heard of reasonable and rationale guidelines for a flagpole, such as these, that I propose:

1. This second flag pole is limited to San Francisco residents.
2. All flags flown must be of a pro-Queer/Gay nature.
3. A flag can fly for up to a month.
4. Rafael Mandelman will be responsible for putting the flag up or someone of credibility (but no merchants) that he appoints.
5. And the Castro merchant basura will have absolutely no control over it, or have any say about it or anything to do with it. Period. We already have ample examples of how they ruin things around here.

*What’s wrong with this idea? It’s the way it was during the Gay Mecca decades — the leather flag was flown the weekend of the Folsom Street Fair, for example — until the self-appointed and self-omnipotent basura authorities called the Castro merchants had to get involved. To them, again, I say: ¡Vete a la chingada!

*While writing this article, I noticed that the major San Francisco conservative gay rag (which again shall remain nameless) also endorsed Rafael. WTF? This is not looking good at all. I stopped reading that rag years ago because all it did was to raise my blood pressure with its increasingly conservative bent and endorsements. Over the years, in my opinion they have been directly responsible for helping shift San Francisco to the right and for conservative-brainwashing what remains of the Gay Community here into becoming more conservative and conformist. That’s how conservative Scott Penis got elected for 8 years. I knew this City had changed when I watched the Gay Community vote in conservative Scott Penis the first time. I thought: WTF has happened here? The publisher was/is very connected with The Establishment (the San Francisco Oligarchy). They endorsed Scott Penis multiple times for any office he ran for. They endorsed the city-wide nudity ban which openly-gay prude Scott Penis authored. They endorsed all anti-homeless measures endorsed by anti-homeless Scott Penis, and I could go on.

So how is it possible that this conservative gay rag would endorse so-called “progressive” Rafael Mandelman? Something is very wrong with this picture. Politics these days are so fucked up. People call themselves anything. This reminds me of a Democratic Party politician in Virginia who says he’s open to supporting the orange nazi for a second term. It also reminds me of Democrat Pelosi who keeps saying this is not the time to talk about impeachment of the orange nazi. These days, people are doing and saying crazy things regardless of what label they wear. And as I’ve said before, with Dem-bots these days, the word “progressive” or “liberal” is merely code language for being a brainwashed supporter of the right-wing, utterly corrupt and imperialistic Establishment Democratic Party, which much of the time works for the other right-wing party: the Republican Party.

*Surely this new second flag pole (the Gay People’s Flag pole) can be installed soon, no? With the millions and billions of dollars in this City from the data-mining/predatory Tech Industrial ComplexTM, surely they could pay for the new flag pole. Their corporations pretend to be very pro-Queer even though many of the techies are anti-Queer based on the anti-gay looks they give whenever any guy happens to glance at them in and around The Castro. The techies give this “don’t you dare look at me faggot” look that some of us have been uncomfortably subjected to in and around The Castro from these Millennial techie trash. Clearly they are not comfortable or secure with their own sexuality to behave in such a way.

Considering Rafael’s pro-Establishment, conservative and right-wing endorsements, particularly from the corrupt and conservative merchants’ group, I can see him continuing in the path of Scott Penis and giving the same people Scott catered to whatever they want. I mean, he cast himself in the mold of that piece of work during the campaign so why wouldn’t he continue that corporatist, conservative agenda script? So to the right-wing who have been having diarrhea moments because according to them “the progressives have taken the Board,” I say: Tranquilo. Tranquilo. I suspect little if anything will change in any genuinely progressive direction. Instead, the continued right-ward shift of The City will continue which is usually the case when fake-progressives (Establishment Democrats trying to climb up the corporate party ladder) are in power. I would imagine that when Mandelman seeks re-election, he’ll have the endorsement of the whole conservative Establishment crowd: Feinstein, Pelosi, et al. As a lawmaker on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, at least Rafael comes with a law degree — he’s an attorney — whereas Feinstein and Pelosi have no legal training at all. Did you know that? It’s true. But like many in the cesspool called the US Congress, both Feinstein and Pelosi are sitting in the congress as “lawmakers” with their Bachelor of Arts degrees in completely unrelated fields to what they’re doing in the Senate and House. I’m not at all criticising a Bachelor of Arts degree, but merely pointing out that one would think that a “lawmaker” in congress would have a graduate-entry professional degree in law (a Doctor of Jurisprudence degree, JD degree). Both Feinstein and Pelosi have been living in my former hometown, the District of Columbia, more than long enough to earn a Doctor of Jurisprudence degree at either of two fine law schools in the District: Georgetown University School of Law or George Washington University School of Law, as two examples. But instead, they both sat on their ass in the senate (Feinstein) and the house (Pelosi) without any legal training or background on their power trips and making laws effecting the lives of millions of people. Oh and by the way, you know la perra that is currently serving as the US ambassador/bully at the UN for the orange nazi? She too has no training for that position either. Just like the orange nazi has no training for the position he currently holds. Is anyone surprised? At the UN, her degree is in Accounting. WTF does a degree in Accounting have to do with a job bullying other nations of the UN?

But I’m off topic. But that’s okay. It’s my site. If I want to be off topic, I will be.

The Reality: I don’t expect any other flagpole to ever appear at HM Plaza, and especially after what I’ve seen about Mandelman after seeing his list of endorsements and mealy-mouthed statements.

I suspect the status quo will continue, and I think there’s no question about that now since billionaire and Angel Investor, Ron Conway, will continue as the real mayor with London Breed serving as his puppet. I saw a picture of Breed and Conway standing together and London was wearing a broad smile and appeared to be delighted to be standing next to the real mayor. Mayor Conway will give the Tech Industrial ComplexTM whatever they want.

Mi amigo/My friend also wanted to add that by openly Queer mayoral candidate Mark Leno losing to Breed, it shows how much power or rather lack of the now-dead Queer Community has lost in San Francisco. If this were just 10 years ago, who do you think would have won? Answer: Mark Leno. So where in the shithole US do gay people have any power today? We can’t think of any place. It used to be the Gay Mecca areas in major US cities, but they’ve been taken over by breeders. (Related: Chelsea: The Death of a Gay Neighborhood, Murdered by Neo-Hetero-Homophobes). “Being gay was so last year anyway,” now that we have all of this “sexual fluidity” nonsense going on.

It’s now time for me to go back to not paying attention to the caca that happens around here (fuck it!), since I don’t like high blood pressure readings. Chau.—el barrio rosa

WTF? (from the video description):

“Rafael Mandelman who is a member of the City College of San Francisco Community College Board of Trustees in an interview on 9/8/17 said he was in favor of the privatization of the SF PUC Balboa Reservoir for development of housing. He also defended the rigged process of community and staff imput in the privatization deal that SF Mayor Ed Lee is pushing for the developers. AFT 2121 has passed a resolution against the privatization of the PUC Balboa Reservoir and it’s acquisition by CCSF for the College use. At present, large numbers of students and staff use the land for parking which they would loose if it was privatized. The SF PUC also was required to offer the property to CCSF before turning it over to developers but violated the law by not offering the land to CCSF before turning over to developers. Mandelman is also running for San Francisco Supervisor.”


San Francisco’s Real Mayor Strongly Backs London Breed

Making laws with a Bachelor of Arts degree

Are there no openly gay people in San Francisco anymore?

Gay Shame: A Sign of the Times

How many Queers can the closet hold?

Lea DeLaria: The LGBTQIA+ acronym is divisive

Hola a todos. No, tranquilo, I’m not going to rehash this topic again. Just the major points. I’m tired of talking about it since I don’t expect anything to ever change in this regard, or at least not any time soon. And rarely does anyone agree with me because the sheeple — including most Queers and breeders — have been so brainwashed to use their revisionist history “LGBT” nonsense.

Instead, I’ll direct readers here to read: The official acronym is now: LGBTQQICAPF2K+. Read that.

I always cringe when I see that “LGBT” thingy in article headlines that one sees all over the internet. One site after the other thinks they must use that “LGBT” thingy in order to conform and be like all the others to “fit in” and be accepted. The same with their readers and commenters. Despite my extensive research on this topic, I’ve never been able to find out who it was exactly — what idiot, what nut, although it must have been a lesbian devoid of any knowledge of our rich Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement history — that started this revisionist history “LGBT” acronym that the stridently conformist, corporatist and now-conservative Queer Community has adopted like a bunch of sheeple. My guess tells me it was one of those Queer media organisations — perhaps run by lesbians since the “L” is first — who arrogantly took it upon themselves to dictate to us Queers what we and the entire world must use when writing about Queer-related topics.

I read yet another reason for the “LGBT” acronym the other day, which went like this:

“Lesbians changed it to LGBT when huge numbers of gay men died from AIDS in the 80s.”

Well I must have missed that. That’s the first time I’ve read that. And if that’s true, it is extremely rude and disrespectful to the thousands of gay guys who led the Gay and Lesbian (GLBTQ) Rights Movement for lesbians to take it upon themselves to move themselves to first place in that “LGBT” acronym. I mean, if they had led and done most of the work of the Movement they would deserve first place. But they didn’t. Gay guys and trans individuals led the movement. While they were doing most of the work, lesbians were sitting on their ass on their hogs with a cigarette in one hand and a beer in the other partying. They think they deserve first place for that, do they? I. Don’t. Think. So.

Regardless, some of us don’t like that LGBTQIA+ mess, including actor and comedienne Lea DeLaria as you can read about here in a lengthy article.

Lea said:

“Part of me believes that this inclusivity of calling us the LGBTQQTY-whatever-LMNOP tends to stress our differences,” she explained. “And that’s why I refuse to do it. I say queer. Queer is everybody.” [Source].

I say Queer. Queer is everybody. You tell it, Lea. You go, girl! I’m right there with you. Right-on!

Lea claims this “LGBT” acronym is the most divisive issue we now have in the Queer Community (as of 2016). I wasn’t aware of that, since everybody is using it except me, Lea and a few others. And “LGBT(Q)” continues to appear on the sites that the article about her appears on, so she hasn’t had any influence on them either unfortunately. Also, I would think more divisive issues today would be:

1. Self-induced gay conversion
2. Gay guys going back in the closet and marrying females and pumping out babies as they try to be like the straight guys due to the order for “Gay Assimilation.”
3. Lesbians trying to look and act like straight women.
4. The death of the Gay Community.
5. “Are there no openly gay people in San Francisco anymore?”.
6. Gay Shame: A Sign of the Times
7. How many Queers can the closet hold?
8. Why do females marry gay guys?
9. The “Discreet” Gay Guys in New York City
10. The gay Jock Bros who reject gay guys
11. Gay Assimilation Has Backfired

To list some concerns I’ve written about.

Leah says that this LGBTQIA+ acronym stresses or puts emphasis on our differences — and divides of — rather than uniting us as Queers. I agree with that. It’s dividing us up into little cages by letters. (Breeders don’t have any letters defining them — they’re just called straight or breeders — and they have pretty much as many varied sexual interests as Queers do.) Maybe that’s another reason why the so-called Gay Community today does not have any feel or sense of “community” now. This may not be the case in some bars that are still genuine gay bars (as opposed to gay bars that breeders are hanging out in and taking over); there may be a feeling of “community” there if everyone is not glued to a phone and is instead talking in person with each other and interacting. But out and about, there’s no feel or sense of a “Gay Community” in San Francisco’s Castro anymore.

Anyway, I was pleased to see a prominent Queer female who understands this, since usually when I bring it up I’m dismissed by the corporatist and adamantly conformist Queers among us who say: It must be “LGBT” (note they leave off the Q). And if you’re not using “LGBT” something is wrong with you.

Conform! Obey! Wear black and grey and always use “LGBT” and vote for the corrupt and imperialistic right-wing Democratic Party, as you’ve been brainwashed to do.

That’s the entire package or slogan and that’s partly what is wrong with the Queer Community today.

With the “LGBT” conformists, what do they have against Queers that causes them to omit the “Q” on the end? By the way, what’s the difference between Gay and Queer? The “LGBT” conformists have no problem with the G (for Gay), but the Q (for Queer) seems to be more advanced for their mindset.

Someone recently told me in defending this alphabet soup mess that “Elgeebeetee” (“LGBT”) is the easiest to pronounce. Well no, Gay or Queer are the easiest to pronounce. They are already well-established words in our vocabulary, idiot. I take it that critical thinking skills are no longer taught in schools here in the shithole US.

Personally, as I’ve written before, I think the Queer community has become too conservative to adopt the word Queer. They couldn’t conceive of that. They would consider that way “too rad/radical” for their conservative tastes. How did the Gay Community become so conservative? WTF? So if anything, they would go with the word Gay. Or as someone told me the other day while I was writing this, “I’m non-heterosexual” because as he said “I’m sick of all these labels.” Yes, I am too. I agree. Many of them are meaningless these days.

But frankly, until one of those busy-bodied Queer organisations issues a Dictate for a one-word change to either Queer or Gay, I don’t see anything changing any time soon with this acronym mess. Just thought I’d pass along what Lea DeLaria said. Chau.—el barrio rosa

Are there no openly gay people in San Francisco anymore?

Hola a todos. I almost didn’t post this article after spending the time writing it because it seems that I’ve said most of this before. Although it will be new to first-time readers or anyone who’s not read those articles, and in a sense this is an update of those articles. Also, most importantly, our little local group of San Francisco Queers got together the other night and they said to me: “We’re asking you affectionally to please write about our meeting and what we talked about to give us a voice since you’re the only person here with a website.” I told them: Well, I’m all for sharing my space (mi diario/my diary – pink barrio) with others to give you and them a voice, so here it is.

Our main topic was this question: Are there no openly gay people in San Francisco anymore, other than ourselves in our little group? I have to say it certainly doesn’t feel like it. I suppose some of the Old City residents who are still here are openly gay but they don’t make it obvious. Even with the most reliable Gaydar, it’s become extremely difficult now to tell who is Queer and who is a breeder in San Francisco. We’re now living in crazy times. And as everyone in our group pointed out and as I have written before, I see many Queer guys (according to my Gaydar) walking around here holding hands with females — WTF? — trying to give the impression that they are a breeder couple. Or, he’s trying to “go straight” and either stay in or go back in the closet. (Related: More back to the 1950s: Gay guys marrying females in droves. Sad. and also here: Gay Shame: A Sign of the Times.) This behaviour is strikingly the opposite of what we saw during the “Out and Proud” Gay Mecca years. I suspect this is true in other major US cities. Why? Is it the residual pharmaceuticals in the agua/water that’s making people insane? Because most Queers now go out of their way to try to “act and look straight” from what we’re seeing.

So this is what we in the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement worked for over decades, is it?

It’s not what I and others thought we were working for I can tell you that! I and others wouldn’t have even taken part in the Movement if we had known that’s what we were doing — and this closeted behaviour we’re seeing today was the ultimate goal — and that this is where we would find ourselves here in 2018. It’s astounding really.

We, our little local group of SF Queers, now feel very much in the small minority. Some in our group expressed their deep sadness that today feels like they could imagine it feeling before the Gay Rights Movement even accomplished anything with breeders being in the majority in our former gay areas here in 2018. They specifically noted the very closeted behaviour one sees all around us today. Oh I know all about that. I see it every day. As I and others in our group pointed out: Most gay people have completely sanitised themselves of any outward appearance of being gay, at least here in San Francisco. Who would have dreamed that would happen in San Francisco of all places?! Well I hope the conservative trash around here are pleased now. I presume they finally have what they whined about, moaned about and complained about and wanted for decades, the useless trash: The Castro: A Disneyfied conservative “Walnut Creek” with Rainbow Flags filled with breeders and their black baby strollers. That’s essentially what we have. Ultimate conformity is in — wear black and grey — with the now-dead and non-activist Gay Community.

That is, if the “Gay Community” can be called a “community” at this point. There is absolutely no feeling or sense of “community” whatsoever today with Queers trying to act like and be like the majority breeder/straight population.

The chronic phone addiction has replaced any sense of community with Queers having become conformist, dopamine-addicted phone zombies wasting their lives on Orwellian-named and billionaire-owned “social media networks.” It really disgusts me and the Queers in our group what the so-called “Gay Community” has become.

So again, the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement worked decades for this? Ugh. Sigh.

As some in our group pointed out, one of the problems with living in a Breeder Mecca is that one starts to receive magazines for children’s clothes because of the zip code you live in. 94114 used to be known as “the gay zip code.” Today, 94114 is apparently known as “the breeder zip code” based on the unwanted magazines I and others receive featuring “him and her” promoting children’s clothes.

While writing this article, mi amigo/my friend and I walked up and down Castro Street. If the Rainbow Flags were not there, one could easily think one were walking up and down Chestnut Street in the breeder Marina. (San Francisco’s Marina district is a traditionally straight area). There’s little to nothing gay/Queer about The Castro here in 2018. Remove the Rainbow Flags and The Castro would look like any other barrio/neighbourhood in The City. Mi amigo and I were standing at the corner of 18th and Castro on our walk through and he looked up the street and said, “Oh look, there are two young guys the same height with their arms around each other.” Yes, it was rather starling to see that. It was so unusual to see that in today’s Castro that he quickly pointed it out. I said: Well take a picture of them because it’s likely the last time you’ll see that any time soon, if at all. Back in the Gay Mecca years we saw that all the time. And he pointed out that the two guys were the same height as gay couples are. Whereas the Millennial breeders have this ludicrous requirement that they must be him-tall-dominant/her-short-submissive. Based on the Millennial breeder couple’s public behaviour, feminism is dead it would appear. Chauvinism and sexism is what Millennials like, especially the females in these mostly Millennial couples. One thing we’ve noticed is that Millennial breeder couples are rarely the same height. It’s some head trip she has going on from my research about that. In her mind, he has to be tall and dominant to protect delicate little her. That sounds like a 1940s or 1950s mindset. (roll eyes). Oh lawd, these fucking breeders. Who reared these fucked up people?

Also, during the Gay Mecca years, there was often a party atmosphere in The Castro. There was always something going on. Not today. The party atmosphere is gone. We noticed that another store from the Old City has closed on Castro, and we saw that Hamburger Mary’s has finally opened. Just what we need: More dead animal with blood running all over the plate (unless you get your burger “well done” with lots of free radicals). More greasy burgers and fries which The Castro is already saturated with. I imagine the other burger places in that area are delighted to have the competition. There is little imagination around here when it comes to opening a restaurant or really anything. How many corporate coffee stores do we have now?

There are a few Queers who still live around me in Castro/Upper Market. They’re from the Old City before tech came in and ruined San Francisco. Nearly all of the single Millennials and couples are the snottiest, unfriendly and snarly people. The couples are nearly always “him and her.” When single guys walk by my apartment building, even with my very reliable Gaydar, I have no idea from looking at them whether they’re gay or a breeder. Because most gay guys and breeders now look the same in overall appearance. The same goes for most lesbians and breeder women. The gay guys are so closeted-acting and go out of their way to present the image that they’re straight. It’s part of that conformity I was talking about and “gay assimilation” nonsense to be as much like the precious breeders as possible. Both gay guys and breeders wear conformist drab, funeral all-black or black and casket-grey clothing. Neither rarely make eye contact with anyone (a quick glance with possibly a snarl is all you get) and they were apparently born without vocal cords, so sadly they don’t have the ability to say “hello” or any other words of human courtesy. We have become a very cold, uncaring, impersonal and unfriendly society since Big Corporate Tech raped the planet with the now world-wide dopamine-phone addiction. I think today fewer people are actually verbally talking with each other than in recorded history.

During the now-long-gone Gay Mecca decades in San Francisco, many Queers used to have small Rainbow Flag pins on their backpack or shoulder bag. They too are gone. Back packs and shoulder bags have been sanitised just like the people wearing them and just like our little former Queer areas in major US cities. (Related: Chelsea (Manhattan): The Death of a Gay Neighborhood, Murdered by Neo-Hetero-Homophobes). “Out and Proud” is most assuredly gone here in 2018.

It’s as if the so-called “Gay Community” said: You know, I’ve tried both being in the closet and out of the closet and I prefer closeted to “out and proud.” Today, it seems that the majority of the seemingly few gay people still living here are very guarded and back in the closet. Their behaviour (especially their eye movements) reminds some of us of what we’ve read about Queers of the 1940-50s. As a couple of people in our group said, “Cruising is completely gone. Cruising has been replaced with people staring at their phones endlessly. They’re looking for that special guy for sex. Hey, look up from your phone! That special guy just walked past you on the sidewalk glued to his phone but neither of you saw each other because you were both glued to your fucking phone.

One person in our group recollected that a number of years ago the major gay rag here in San Francisco (which shall remain nameless since I have no respect for them) published a letter from some closeted, septic idiotic reader saying “It’s not time to be out of the closet.” This was during the Obama years politically. With people like that reader, it’s never the right time for anything progressive on anything. A couple of people (of the responses they published) objected to that letter, but I guess most agreed with that person based on the state of things today. I stopped reading that conservative rag years ago because it did nothing but raise my blood pressure. It became nothing but a mouthpiece for the conservative agenda which was slowly sweeping over San Francisco and that rag seemed to be brainwashing the so-called “gay community” here into becoming conservatives. That rag endorsed the anti-homeless sit-lie law in mealy-mouthed language. I should point out that many homeless people are Queer which seemed to escape that rag. They also endorsed that dreadful conservative Scott Penis who pretends to be a “moderate.” In San Francisco, I think it’s well-known that the word “moderate” is code language for conservative. That rag also endorsed the city-wide nudity ban. They endorsed other conservatives pretending to be “a moderate” and they were eating the ass of the San Francisco Oligarchy because the publisher was well-connected to San Francisco City Hall. That gay rag’s publisher has been directly responsible for promoting the new conservative agenda in San Francisco. (FYI: San Francisco is no longer the “alternative, proudly radical and anything goes” City it once was. That City is gone). As a longtime friend of mine — who was a friend of Harvey Milk — said to me recently: “The City has become quite conservative. Today, we could never get away with doing some of the things we did back in the Gay Mecca years.” That’s true. Back to that gay rag I mentioned, one of my problems with them is that they endorsed (and probably still do) candidates interested in getting into politics presumably without knowing anything in detail about the person’s politics. Why did they endorse the candidate? Because the person was/is gay. WTF? An endorsement of a candidate should be about much more than the candidate’s sexual orientation and party affiliation. Just because someone is gay does not make the person qualified for office or a good candidate or worthy of an endorsement. Think conservative Scott Penis, as one example. He’s awful. Yet that rag has had their head up his conservative upper colon for years. That’s what we need is more gay conservatives [sarcasm intended], regardless of what they call themselves and regardless of what corrupt party they feed from. I’d much rather have a straight politician whose politics are in line with mine over a gay politician whose politics are not remotely aligned with mine.

I’ve also reached my fatigue level with “the first [fill in blank]” candidates, which corporate gay rags often like to go on about. I’m talking about “the first openly-gay candidate.” Or “the first Black candidate” or “the first Asian candidate” or “the first woman candidate” or “the first Latino candidate.” Or “the first openly HIV-positive candidate.” Is “the first openly HIV-positive candidate” intended as a sympathy run? In San Francisco, I remember seeing this ridiculous headline: “In historical move, mayor appoints first openly HIV-positive supervisor.” Oh please! What about “the first candidate with openly chronic colds?” What about the “first candidate with openly chronic diarrhea? Surely that too would be a sympathy run! But in nearly every instance I can think of since this nonsense began, “the first [fill in the blank] candidate” turned out to be just as bad or worse than the straight white political trash preceding them. These “first” candidates fulfilled a conservative agenda working for their corporate owners just like the political basura preceding them. We had “the first Asian mayor” in San Francisco and he was a disaster, although the conservatives adored him, rewrote history and bestowed Sainthood Status on him when he died. Obama was “the first Black” president and overall he turned out to be worse than illegitimate George W Bush. One example: Those who paid close attention during his regime — rather than going into a self-induced coma for 8 years merely because of that D next to his name — know that Obama greatly expanded the Bush/Cheney neocon agenda, and Mr Nobel Peace Prize Obama left office with 8-9 wars (I lost count) in progress. The so-called “gay community” remained absolutely silent and never protested any of Obama’s wars or his other neocon despicable policies — because to them wars are perfectly okay if it’s a Democrat leading it — or anything else he did because of that D next to their messiah Obama’s name. Apparently the so-called “gay community” didn’t care how many gay people Obama’s wars killed. Or do they live under the illusion that wars only kill breeders? The same gay hypocrites did protest Bush’s wars. Why? Because Bush had that R (for Republican) next to his name. That makes a difference, you ask? It does to brainwashed partisans, both D and R. Another political disaster: Openly-gay Scott Penis (Mr PrEP). Also, it was one of the Asian SF supervisors who cast the deciding vote in favour of San Francisco’s city-wide nudity ban because of a few naked guys on the odd occasion in The Castro. Then, most recently, we have the “first openly gay appointee” of the orange nazi’s regime. Yes. “Openly gay US ambassador to Deutschland/Germany makes Republican history. Richard Grenell is the highest ranking openly gay official ever in a Republican regime according to the current Log Cabin Republican’s president. From what I can tell, this guy is a gay nazi. And consequently there are now calls to expel him from Deutschland after he pledged to “empower the far right across Europe.” Is that what you would expect from a gay guy? “If people like U.S. ambassador Richard Grenell believe they can dictate like a lord of the manor who rules in Europe and who doesn’t, they can no longer remain in Germany as a diplomat.” So I’ve had it up to here with this “first [fill in blank] candidate” caca. I think it’s technically called identity politics. Let’s admit it: Humans are humans regardless of their skin pigmentation, their sexual orientation, or beliefs, with the exception to that being fundamentalists, the far-right, fascists, nazis and fake-Christians.

We, in our group, all agreed that back in the closet is where it’s at today, unfortunately. Some Queers reading this might disagree with that statement, but that’s what we see here in 2018 San Francisco. You might see it where you live too if you ever look up from your phone. How could this possibly have happened so quickly historically speaking? Our group agreed it’s because of that Gay Assimilation nonsense. Gay Assimilation has backfired, as some of us predicted it would.

The last few times mi amigo/my friend has gone to his gym in The Castro, he said: “I didn’t see one Queer person the entire time going and coming to the gym and I was the only person wearing colour at the gym. Everyone was wearing black except me. Every time I go into The Castro, another store has closed. I don’t think you’d want to be in The Castro at night.”

Yet during the Gay Mecca years, The Castro was where it was happening at night, usually with a party atmosphere. The Castro came alive at night and it was a very safe neighbourhood then, except when the cops came in to “fuck with the Gays” and crack skulls. Years later, in storm the (wealthy) breeders to take over and “mark their territory” with their mandatory hand-holding and telenovela-style make-out scenes on the sidewalk. The Castro village has drastically changed as a result. Also, with the influx of wealthy breeders in The Castro and Upper Market, our crime rate has soared.

I signed out of e-mail the other day and read this ridiculous headline among all the other tabloid-style headlines on that pathetic “news site:” It said, “More people in the US ‘identify’ as gay than ever before.” Yeah sure they do; that explains why I see more and more anti-gay hate online because, “More people in the US ‘identify’ as gay than ever before.” And where the fuck are they, and who believes that caca? I don’t often use the term “fake news” but I think this is a case of “fake news.” I didn’t click on the article because I thought it was more tabloidy bull shit from that site. I don’t believe that, “More people in the US ‘identify’ as gay than ever before” considering what I’m seeing in San Francisco and what I see online. To the contrary, we’re seeing more and more gay people going back in the closet. That’s not “identifying” as gay.

Along those same lines, I’m also seeing the word “faggot” all over the place now online. Often when someone disagrees with another person — especially in YT comments — the response can start out like this: “Listen faggot…” even though the person has given no indication of his/her sexuality orientation. Calling someone a “faggot” is the new put-down in these nazi times. Or, I’ll see a headline about some hater who called someone “a faggot” as was the case recently in flight from St. Croix to Miami when the flight attendance refused to give a passenger a beer and a fight broke out on the plane in our increasingly rude and dysfunctional society. And the rabid supporters of the basura en la casa blanca constantly use the word “faggot.” They are his nazi, 14/88 supporters — who see him the same way he sees himself: He is above all laws — and these nazis specifically write, “no niggers, no faggots” and they talk about killing both.

That poll I mentioned earlier was as unbelievable as a recent Gallup poll saying “More people in the US are supporting gay marriage than ever before.” I did a bit of research after seeing that and learned that Gallup is considered one of the most unreliable polling outfits of them all. This also brought to mind a poll I saw sometime ago that said that most people — of those polled — support gay rights, but the same people did not approve of seeing gay people kissing in public. WTF? Sigh. Don’t try to understand that hypocrisy. So the majority in a poll claimed to support gay rights but they don’t want to see gay people kissing? Loco. I assume the same people have no problem seeing breeders kissing and making out in public? They only have a problem seeing gay people do it? Related: US public: Gay legal rights = good, gays kissing = bad.

Again (for the thick people), other than the Rainbow Flags that are up for tourist exploitation in The Castro, there’s nothing visibly gay here now with the locals. They’ve all sanitised themselves just like the neighbourhood. Awhile back there was a campaign called “Queering The Castro.” Is that what you would expect to see in San Francisco’s (former) Gay Mecca? That’s how bad it’s gotten.

They’ve turned The Castro into a Disneyfied tourist trap complete with non-native palm trees, (dingy) rainbow crosswalks at 18th and Castro (the rainbow crosswalks in West Hollywood look much better), and the Gay Walk of Fame in the sidewalks similar to the Hollywood Walk of Fame. We did have rainbow colour-changing lights on utility poles for two blocks of Castro between Market and 19th Street for awhile but they’re now gone for some reason. Some of the stores still try to sell gay-related merchandise to tourists. I don’t think any of the locals buy it. We have the remaining bars which were originally gay but breeders go to most of them now, and there are still a few adult sex stores in The Castro. Most of them now cater to breeders with their “him and her” window displays. I personally avoid the block of Castro between 18th and 19th Streets because I’m sick of seeing Millennial breeders holding hands and or making out, and that’s one of the worst blocks for seeing their “in your face” breeder sexuality. Walk by that overpriced bougi restaurant up there — that serves pig cheek or pig butt, I forget which — and who does one usually see sitting in the window seats? Him and her fawning over each other in The Castro. Get a room somewhere! Most of the restaurant reviews for the mediocre Castro restaurants that I read most recently were written by females who often don’t live anywhere near here according to their profile. In their review they refer to “my husband and I” or “my boyfriend and I,” (breeders!) and there can be a picture of “him and her.” As I said, you’d think you’re in the Marina district.

I don’t see the national elitist Queer organisations doing a damn thing these days, do you? Nothing of any effective nature. They only care about Queers of their same income bracket or higher. Homeless Queers? Those organisations couldn’t care less about the Queer homeless. I read while writing this article that one of those national Queer organisations — although they use that conformist/corporatist “LGBT” revisionist history acronym nonsense — said that they are watching what the orange man-child does and “we will hold him accountable.” That’s hysterical when the cesspool called the US congress can’t even hold him accountable or make any attempt to do so. He and his despicable nazi regime couldn’t care less what they at that Queer organisation think.

And the people in our group have seen the Dead Gay Community’s silent response — no massive protests in the streets by the millions anywhere as would have been the case during the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement years; too busy glued to their fucking phones? — since the deranged and insane “it’s all about me” orange man-child took up residency en la casa blanca/the white house. (BTW, Hillary won the popular vote, even though I didn’t support her). Queers are even referring to the basura as “president” which is giving him respect when he deserves and has earned no respect whatsoever:

1. The Orange Man’s Assault on Queers and others
2. The Orange Man’s regime says employers can fire people because they’re gay
3. The orange man reportedly joked that his vp sidekick ‘wants to hang’ all gays
4. Expect The Orange Man to serve his full term.
5. The Orange Man and his supporters hate the US
6. Why would anyone expect The Orange Man to honour Queer Pride Month?
7. The fake-Queer guys supporting The Orange Man
8. ¿El Hombre Naranja Presidente?

I keep reading headlines such as, “Twi**er erupted” over some lies or caca this piece of nazi trash typed overnight. And what is that going to do because “Twi**er erupted?” Nothing! Absolutely nothing. It doesn’t inconvenience anyone. But massive protests do. Sitting on your ass in the luxury of your living room typing on your phone to get another dopamine hit doesn’t do a damn thing in the big scheme of things. I would imagine the deranged and insane orange man-child loves it when “Twi**er erupts” because it gives his big fat ass in those white pants more and more attention, which he constantly craves. I’d like to point out that toilets “erupt” every time they’re flushed to, but that’s no big deal. I think that Orwellian-named “social media” billionaire-owned corporation (Twi**er) here in San Francisco that gets corporate welfare from the City and County of San Francisco through generous tax breaks (it’s always good to give corporate welfare to billionaires!) would be out of business today if the orange man-child hadn’t finally made them relevant by his dopamine-addiction to their “platform.” Ugh.

So I come back to this just as our little group did the other night: We Queers worked decades for this closeted and dead state of affairs, did we?

That’s why I refer to the Dead Queer Community. And every time I look out my window and see a couple walking by (or hear one, it’s usually her voice) it’s the perfunctory and ubiquitous “him and her.” He’s holding Ms Needy’s hand as per the requirement. Needy breeder females seem to be so damn insecure in their breeder relationships that they constantly need their hand held like children. They’re constantly needing attention from their guy. He must be exhausted from all of her silly requirements of him: Open my door for helpless me, pull out my chair for helpless me, buy flowers for needy me, buy gifts for needy and attention-seeking me and a bank of other ridiculous, sexist and chauvinistic requirements. Does he have to go to the bathroom with her too? Does he have to lower the toilet seat for Ms Needy/Ms Helpless too? I would have none of it! I would not have the patience for that nonsense. If you can’t open your own car door, you can park your ass on the sidewalk until you’re able to. (With the exception, someone who is disabled). Queer relationships are not like this. They’re much more mature and more secure. And usually Queer couples are the same height. Not this him-tall/her-short dominant-submissive head trip.

So why are supposed breeders so attracted to Rainbow Flags?

They’re not. Even though that’s the way it appears. It’s a false impression. Our answer to this question is different now: We honestly believe that breeders are “attracted to Rainbow Flags” (so to speak) as a way of marking their territory, since they have taken over The Rainbow Flag Castro and Upper Market (the former Gay Mecca) area. They have more than made everyone aware of their obnoxious presence with their in-your-face make-out sessions on the sidewalks in and around The Castro often under a Rainbow Flag as to say, “fuck you faggots,” and with their mandatory hand-holding to let us all know they are a breeder couple (who care?!), and with their make-out sessions in restaurants causing some restaurant patrons to say, “Get a room somewhere; this restaurant is not your living room,” and by their making anti-gay and anti-trans comments in The Castro. And let’s not forget their piles of vomit on the sidewalk — especially on weekends around here on Market Street; you must watch where you walk — and their projectile vomit on the windows of businesses from their drunken spree the night before. Breeder assholes love to get drunk. What is wrong in their pathetic lives that leads to that obnoxious behaviour? From my many years of experience in Queer bars, it was rare to see anyone ever drunk and it was extremely rare to see any guy throw up on the sidewalk.

In the Queer Community, being drunk was seen as a bad thing: an alcohol problem. Not celebrated the way breeders do. But with these breeders, in order to be “cool” you have to be drunk to the point of vomiting seems to be their thinking.

If we (our group) were straight, we would not be hanging out, moving to or living in an area with Rainbow Flags. As a straight person, I would question why I’m supposed to live there. But the unspoken word among breeders seems to be, “Just ignore the flags, they’ll be gone someday. The big Rainbow Flag at Castro/Market will be replaced with a US flag. The Castro Rainbow Flags are displayed to attract tourists to the area who expect to see the flags here because of the Gay Mecca history of The Castro, if these transplant breeders are even aware of the history of The Castro. Some of think they aren’t. “But we breeders now own The Castro and have taken over so just keep that in mind, and to other breeders like ourselves: Welcome.” That seems to be their message.

I asked our group: Or are many of these Millennial guys we see holding hands with a female closet cases trying to check out the Castro neighbourhood hoping to “discreetly” find that one (openly) gay guy who’s still living here and make eye contact with when “his girl” is not looking and using needy-her (who’s hanging onto him like a magnet) as a prop to give the impression he’s straight?

The topic of the Rainbow Flags in The Castro came up twice during the evening. Some in our group asked: When are they going to take down the Rainbow Flags in The Castro since they are inappropriate for the new Breeder Mecca? Someone said: There would seem to be far more breeder-monied interests here now than the money made with Queer tourist dollars. I said: Well again, the only reason the Rainbow Flags are still up is to bring in tourism dollars to San Francisco from those unknowing gullible tourist who still think that San Francisco/The Castro is a Gay Mecca. After these tourists arrive here and take a look around they will immediately become disappointed that they came all this way and the expense involved to see a Breeder-Baby Mecca with lots of all-black baby strollers and with all-black clothed breeders holding hands in their mandatory mode. If breeders are not holding hands, they’re holding their phones, or a phone is in the free hand. There must always be a phone available. (We’ve heard and seen many breeder arguments/fights on the sidewalks in The Castro over her being outraged because he forget to charge their phone and she was having another emotional melt-down). So, these tourists will be asking: “Where are all the gay people I came to see? This looks like home. This looks like where I came from. I can see straights and baby strollers at home.”

Someone pointed out the straight/breeder “Make-out Zone” under the big Rainbow Flag at Castro and Market Streets. Yeah, that too. I remember the first time I saw a breeder couple making out under the Rainbow Flag in Harvey Milk Plaza. I had never seen that before and couldn’t believe it. WTF? Breeders have the entire City and County of San Francisco to make out in including the many straight bars, but where do they choose to come to make out? Harvey Milk Plaza of all places under the giant Rainbow Flag! That told me that the neighbourhood was indeed changing. From that day on, I saw this breeder behaviour more and more. These days, one rarely sees gay couples making out there or anywhere. One gets the impression that breeders have indeed hijacked the Rainbow Flag.

As a Queer person, I don’t seek out or go to straight bars. But these Millennials do seek out gay bars. Why are straights partying in a gay bar when there are a plethora of straight bars in San Francisco and throughout the world. Is it to take them over? Is this part of their “marking their territory” agenda? Why can’t they leave the gay space for gay people since openly gay people are not accepted in straight bars and can be called the pejorative “faggot” in a straight bar and can also be subject to violence there?

Some of the Queers in our group said that they had heard from locals or read stories such as this one: A gay guy walked over to a large group of loud and obnoxious straights partying in a gay bar. The gay guy asked these breeders politely if they could “keep it down a bit.” They responded with: “Fuck off faggot. Leave us alone. This is our space.” As he walked away from these homophobes he heard one of the guys say, “Fuckin’ faggot.”

Sigh. One does not expect to hear that hate in one’s own gay bar. And why are these assholes in a gay bar to begin with?

A gay guy gets the same reaction if he tries to show interest in another guy in a gay bar, but the other guy turns out to be straight. What is a homophobic straight guy doing sitting in a gay bar? WTF?

So a gay guy can be treated with such disrespect in his own gay bars because of this strange phenomenon of homophobic straights going to gay bars. This did not happen when gay bars were gay bars. There’s also the increasing anti-trans comments one is hearing in The Castro. There’s not this “love fest” between Queers and breeders that some conservative trash like to go on about who have strongly welcomed the breeders to come in and take over our little gay area. The conservatives have long-despised gay areas of major cities and pejoratively referred to them as “ghettos.” How many ghettos have you seen with $1Million-plus homes and over-priced bougi luxury vehicles, Dahling?

Historically, there’s a reason why straights and Queers had their own separate bars, up until recently in the big scheme of things when straights decided to invade gay bars as if they own the place. We Queers had our own bars for our own safety and security, and also so we would not be the subject of hate in our own bars.

As my neighbour and I were standing in front of our apartment building one weekend afternoon recently, one “him and her” couple (tall/short of course) after the other walked passed us — along with a breeder Millennial couple with their mandatory-black baby stroller — in their mandatory hand-in-hand mode, or her hand through his arm mode rather. As usual, the female was walking in a subservient manner to the guy. One-half step behind him. Not as his equal. Clearly, she’s an “out and proud” feminist. [sarcasm intended]. Overhearing their conversation, they were talking about the most stupid shit. Nothing remotely intelligent.

Speaking of closet cases: There’s a well-known news anchor/”journalist” today on the US corporate media who became well-known during the Clinton regime. I remember him being well-known as an openly gay guy during the Clinton years. I don’t care to mention his name. He disgusts me. I recently saw him interview attorney Michael Avenatti (Stormy Daniel’s attorney). This “journalist” sat there seemingly trying to defend the deranged orange man-child from any accusations of any wrongdoings. This so-called “journalist” has become quite the conservative Establishment US Oligarchy ass eater. While writing this article I did a little bit of research on him. I read that he and his wife (with their two children) can’t have enough sex — supposedly with each other — and that his wife says that she’s lost friends over this. It seems that when she tells her friends about all the sex that she and GS (this “journalist”) have nearly constantly (or that’s the impression they like to give), this causes her friends to explode in anger, pound their fists on desks, break wine glasses in jealousy and other extreme measures of envy. Don’t you always behave like this when you find out that someone has a lot of sex or more sex than you do? Where do these people come from? Maybe they have lots of sex together as her way of trying to “keep him straight.” I found a message forum with people discussing this guy’s sexuality. According to one person who worked at his network, it was common knowledge that he was gay and was seen in the network’s building with his gay partner, and this so-called “journalist” hung out around Dupont Circle in the District. Others said they thought he was bi. Anyway, I don’t know what that wife of his finds the least bit attractive about him at this point from a physical standpoint. His blindingly white teeth don’t match the rest of his facial appearance. Let’s just say that he certainly doesn’t have the “hot looks” that he had during the Clinton years, or at least he doesn’t to me. She looks very young by comparison. He looks like he’s of an age to be her father. Maybe that’s their head trip: A daddy and daughter sexual head trip. But I got the impression that they had a blind date some years ago and he got hooked onto her with his “heterosexual sexy fantasies” and “went straight.” (roll eyes) Oh, okay. Well, sooner or later, his gay feelings will come calling because gay feelings cannot be suppressed permanently. They eventually rise up and sometimes create havoc from being suppressed for so long. Related: This Gay Mormon Man Who Got Famous For Marrying A Straight Woman Is Getting Divorced). I also read that a Queer organisation gave this news anchor/so-called “journalist” and his wife an award for being “actively involved in improving the lives of young people and addressing the disparities in opportunities that exist for those from marginalized communities, including the LGBT community.” So they gave a Queer award — although they used that revisionist history “LGBT” acronym — to a closet case? During the Gay Mecca decades, that wouldn’t have made any sense whatsoever. But these days, in our Orwellian upside-down world, that does indeed make sense. I think it’s most appropriate to give a gay guy who goes back in the closet and marries a female and pumps out a couple of children an award for some “LGBT” related cause, don’t you? [sarcasm intended].

I’ve seen some online comments from the far-right making fun of the “LGBT(Q)” acronym by writing it: “LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ.” I understand their point. This string of letters is ridiculous. In this rare instance, I agree with the far right. I’m sick of these silly, history-revisionist acronyms too that the conformists and corporatist Queers among us have brainwashed most Queers into mindlessly using. I wrote about that here: The official acronym is now: LGBTQQICAPF2K+.

The bottom line: Be who you are and true to your genuine sexual orientation, and not who you think a heteronormative, breeder-based society of “him and her” wants you to be.

Someone, such as a likely conservative pretending to be a “liberal” or “progressive” (since that’s the way things work these days), would say to me:

“You need to get with the times. You’re trying to live in the past ‘back in the day.’ You don’t understand that things have changed, and they have changed for the positive. This is a much better time now. Get with it.”

This (pink barrio) is my personal diario/my diary that you’re reading where I often reflect on things and the state of things and what I see and what my friends see. You need to understand that I am remembering the past — as we all should — while living in the present. Because if we don’t remember the past, we are destined to repeat it, and that’s exactly where we’re headed in case you don’t know it, Mr/Ms “Get with the times,” as you live in your denial. And frankly, I don’t see Queers going back in the closet as something positive. To me, gay guys holding hands with females and trying to “go straight” is not something positive. The whole thing is bazaar. That’s a form of self-induced conversion therapy that I’ve written about at that link. Gay guys worked for decades in the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement and then, in the end, many decide to “go straight” and marry a female? WTF? That’s insane. That’s what closet cases have been doing for generations and continue to do today. Also, acting snotty to each other in this increasingly cold and lobotomised society is not a positive thing. Seeing Queer areas in major cities disappearing is not a positive thing. None of that is positive. Seeing the US Supreme Court rule in favour of discrimination against a gay couple where the bakery refuses to make a wedding cake for them is not “a change for the positive” nor an indicator “of a much better time now”. But if you want to live under some illusion that there’s this “love fest” between breeders and Queers that some (conservatives) in the Queer so-called “community” want to believe exists, go right ahead. Does your denial serve you well?

Also in The Castro, one sees the Millennial techie trash guys, the tech bros giving unfriendly, anti-gay, nasty looks to any (closeted) gay guy who happens to glance at them, as if the tech bro is thinking: “Don’t you look at me, faggot.” What is the techie asshole doing in The Castro to begin with if he’s that damn insecure with his own sexuality that he’s too afraid of having another guy glance or look at him?

Here in 2018 (but this happened some time ago): One’s personal Rainbow Flags have been stuck back in the closet, or thrown away. One’s coloured handkerchiefs that gay guys wore in their back pockets of their jeans during the Gay Mecca years — indicating what a guy was into sexually — are back in the closet or thrown away. One doesn’t see those anymore.

So this sad state of affairs is what we worked decades for, eh? Despite some progress for Queers having been made — some of which is quickly being eroded and erased — I’m afraid we’re not convinced it was worth it. And in our opinion, the self-appointed Queer authorities known as the corporatist national US Queer organisations are directly responsible for ruining the so-called “Gay Community.” This is particularly true as pro-Establishment Queer publications — both locally and at the national level — helped to brainwash the so-called “Gay Community” into becoming more and more conservative and Establishment ass-eaters. This shift to the right was especially noticeable under their messiah the Obama regime. The obedient Queer community followed like a bunch of sheeple.

Some examples:

1. Why do Queers want to kill other Queers?
2. Is Obama Responsible For Gay Marriage?
3. Obama and the Transgender Activist
4. Obama a “Centrist?” WTF?
5. What is an Obamabot?

The so-called “Gay Community” has become very conservative, regardless of what label they wear today and in their conservative appearance: conservative all-black or black and grey clothing.

These corporatist Queer organisations — one of them threw the trans community under the bus some years ago — seem to have lived under some illusion that they knew what was best for us, and in the end, they had their head up corporate ass. They arrogantly gave the order for “Gay Assimilation” after gay marriage became legal throughout the shithole US.

Translation of “Gay Assimilation:” Blend in with the breeders. Almost apologise to the breeders for inconveniencing them and offending them with our former radical activist behaviour as we worked for Gay rights. Try to be like the breeders in all ways — especially in their obsession with corporate sports teams and their jock mentality with some homophobia added in, in some cases — and emulate the breeders in all ways so they will love us, and see us no differently than they themselves. (roll eyes) Yeah right.

Unfortunately, the so-called “Gay Community” misinterpreted that “Gay Assimilation” order from on High to mean: Go back in the closet to be like the breeders. Our little group of local SF Queers would like to know: Who put the dysfunctional breeders up on a pedestal — with their over 50% divorce rate here in the US — to be modeled after? This is loco/crazy. Go to some of the websites for these corporatist Queer organisations. What do you see? You’ll see their front page saturated with rows and rows of corporate logos. They have completely sold out to corporate interests. They have lost their way, and as far as we’re concerned they have become irrelevant. Today, we have no respect for any of them, or at least the ones that come to mind. They’ve become corporate basura. Chau.—el barrio rosa


Gay Assimilation Has Backfired

Gay Shame: A Sign of the Times

“Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” continues

San Francisco’s Breeder Mecca (November 2016 and forward). Especially on weekends.

How many Queers can the closet hold?

Lesbians trying to look like straight women

Why do females marry gay guys?

The gay Jock Bros who reject gay guys

More back to the 1950s: Gay guys marrying females in droves. Sad.

The Closeted Queer Community (2017)

Gay “Assimilation:” Back to the 1950s

What’s the problem with GLBTQ “assimilation?”

Change Gay Pride to Gay Discreet

Why don’t the Millennials paint their face black?

Hola a todos. It should be abundantly clear to everyone at this point in time — at least to those who have been paying attention — that the Millennial trash are extremely obsessed with the colour black. Well, they’re obsessed with black and grey, but mainly black. (The Millennials: The Generation with a Dress Code). I don’t know who started this stupid and ludicrous fad but like a bunch of conformist sheeple, no matter where you look the Millennials are in lockstep with wearing cult-all-black (or black and drab grey) every day of the year, without exception. Period. They even wear black and or grey when jogging (even at night) which makes them extremely easy for motorists and cyclists to see. [sarcasm intended]. Millennial cyclists are also wearing all-black or black and grey (even at night) and often without any bike lights. Stupid is in.

But there’s something missing and the Millennials don’t seem to have realised this. Why don’t they all wear black make-up and paint their white face black, since they’re possessed, obsessed, fixated and addicted with black?

I saw this female just before I wrote this article. She had blond hair. She was in Millennial all-black (from the neck down) and was pushing the usual oversized Millennial black baby stroller. Presumably she enjoys baking that baby at 350 degrees whenever it’s scorching hot out in that black baby stroller. But as is typical with the Millennials, conformity is more important to them than their comfort level (or the comfort level of their baby). They adamantly prefer to wear all-black and sweat bullets when it’s hot out than to be in a cooler colour. And for those who don’t know, all-black baby strollers are the most recent conformist fad of these air-head Millennials. Everyone has one. Whenever I see a baby stroller in San Francisco, it’s black. Or black and white striped. But black has to be the dominant colour. So I looked at this woman from a distance and I saw all-black, except for her white face. And I thought: How odd. Why hasn’t she painted her face black to match all the rest? Why does she and all other Millennials leave their face white? Just thought I’d ask. That seems to be a good question. And let’s not forget their gigantic black SUVs — with one person in the thing as they’re driving while on their black phone — and their sanitised blindly-white walled (with black and grey accessories) Luxury Designer Condos, Dahling.

Clearly, the Millennials are terrified of pretty and beautiful (Latin) colours.

In this context, black equates with being lazy and being non-creative because 365 days a year, these Millennial zombies wear a black shirt, black pants, black shoes, black underwear, black bra, black socks, black nylons, black tights, black hat, black stiletto heels, black purse, black glasses, black lipstick, black nail polish, black rings, black earrings, and so forth. So why the white face? Why leave your face white? And when everything is black, one doesn’t have to use one’s brain and think about what one will wear. Just buy all-black clothing and all-black accessories, and you’re all set to look like a mindless black Millennial zombie every day of the year (of course with a black phone cemented to your hand). You’re also prepared to go to the next funeral upon a moment’s notice.

Maybe black face-painting will be the next shallow fad we see from these conformist, lobotomised Millennial trash. Chau.—el barrio rosa


Millennials: Are they as miserable as they look?

Gay Shame: A Sign of the Times

Another gay guy goes back in the closet in now-conservative San Francisco after living years in the former Gay Mecca.

Hola. Mi amigo/My friend saw a guy at his gym yesterday that he knew from his former gym. His former gym was known as the gay gym during the Gay Mecca years. Mi amigo remembers him as being all about gay pride at the previous gym and the guy hung out with the gay guys. Mi amigo remembers this guy being one of the guys who asked him every year, “Are you ready for Pride?”

Well, at this gym yesterday, the guy came over and said hello which startled mi amigo because usually no one says a word to each other at his new gym — they’re all on their phones — and the gym is mostly Millennials who don’t talk with anybody. Mi amigo said to the guy: Haven’t seen you in a long time. The guy said, “No, I’ve been busy with my wife and kid.” Mi amigo said he felt like his face dropped to the floor. He said he felt like he had walked into a door when he heard that. He gained his composure and did a bit of enquiring. He asked the guy: How long have you been with your wife? The guy said: “A couple of years.” Mi amigo took the plunge and said: But you were gay at the other gym. The guy said (as he visibly started squirming): “Yeah well, as the neighbourhood (The Castro) began changing to straight I began to think about things and didn’t feel it was right to be gay anymore. So I tried to meet a woman and did, and we have a kid.” Mi amigo asked the guy (although he said he felt he asked this question with a disgusted tone): Are you happy now? The guy said: Ah, sometimes. Women are different.

Mi amigo told me: The guy seemed quite sad, unhappy and didn’t really want to talk about it.

I told mi amigo upon hearing this: Well this is the first instance I know of that a gay guy has forthrightly admitted that he has allegedly “gone straight” because the neighbourhood has. Loco./Crazy.

Mi amigo said to me: How much longer is this silly and mentally-twisted fad of gay guys going back in the closet going to last before their gay feelings take control of them?

As I pointed out to mi amigo: This guy could have “gone straight” years ago. All he had to do was to move his gay-shame ass over to breeder North Beach, or breeder Union Street, or the breeder Marina, or to breeder Pacific Heights or any other breeder barrio/neighbourhood in San Francisco that is full of breeders and he would have fit right in after going back in the closet. Why did it take The Castro going straight and becoming the Breeder Mecca for this gay guy — and many others just like him that we’ve seen around here — to try to “go straight” and head back in the closet? And now he has a child to deal with.

Mi amigo doesn’t remember what the guy’s partner looked like, but he remembers that the guy did have a (gay) partner. What happened to him? Did he get dumped for a female?

Mi amigo told me: this guy came off as being very bored with the whole breeder thing. He seemed to have realised how much work a family really is, and that maybe he should have remained true to his gay sexual orientation rather than following shallow silly fads — and disrespecting his genuine gay sexual orientation — and that gay conversion nonsense that tries to get gay guys to become straight/a breeder. One might think I’m talking about Topeka Kansas with gay guys going back in the closet. But no, this is happening right here in the former Gay Mecca of San Francisco. As some would say: Unbelievable. Chau.—el barrio rosa


More back to the 1950s: Gay guys marrying females in droves. Sad.

Why do females marry gay guys?

How many Queers can the closet hold?

The official acronym is now: LGBTQQICAPF2K+

Gay Assimilation Has Backfired

Gay guys self-induced conversion therapy

Change Gay Pride to Gay Discreet

The Queer Community is Dead (2014 and beyond)

San Francisco’s Disneyfied Castro

Lesbians trying to look like straight women