Featured post

Closeted Gay Guy Seeking Wing-Woman

Hola. There was this personal ad in the men-for-women category on ClosetList (that’s my nickname for the site) in San Francisco recently. The ad has now expired but I found it interesting in a rather sad and pathetic way.

The gay guy who wrote the ad is in the closet. He was looking for a “wing-woman,” a female to serve as his “cover” should he be seen or found hanging out in a gay bar by his amigos or co-workers. He wrote that, “I’m into guys, but San Francisco is unfortunately a very small town and I’m not quite ready to come out of the closet.” Well, when will you be ready to come out, chico? Even as much as San Francisco has changed to where it’s nothing like the former Gay Mecca, if you can’t come out of the closet here there’s no hope for you. You won’t be able to come out anywhere. He wrote that if seen or found in a gay bar, that he would tell his friends or co-workers — as if he’s required to explain to them why he’s in a gay bar that they too are in — that he’s there with this “amazing lady” (pointing to his “wing-woman” sitting next to him). In other words, he would lie to his amigos and co-workers and pretend to be a breeder.

All of this energy put in to making up lies about himself. Wouldn’t it be easier to come out of the closet, chico? That only takes a few minutes. I think he’ll be surprised at how easy that is — should he ever come out — versus all the time and energy spent in making up stories and trying to keep the stories straight, dishonesty, deceit, lies and being a fraud. And it’s most difficult to place any trust in a person like that.

He’s another fucked-up Millennial (he said he’s 28 years old), and there’s no shortage of them.

There was a time — during the days of the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement — when Queers moved to major cities where we could be anonymous to come out of the closet, not to stay in the closet, or go back in the closet. In a major city, who cares that some guy is Queer or what he does sexually? Nobody. But in these fucked-up days, even in major cities many gay guys can’t find it within their weak selves to be honest about who they are. They don’t have the strength to come out. In 2017, they are ashamed they are gay so they want a female accomplice with them so she can pretend to be “the gf” (the girlfriend) of Mr Closet Case. As I’ve written before, in Closetlist ads the “gf” is predictably always out of town and that’s because she doesn’t exist. So why isn’t this “amazing lady” who is posing as his “gf” out of town with all the other “gf’s” that are out of town in personal ads, huh? This guy’s ad was written as if he’s living in some small anti-Queer hick town with prying eyes instead of San Francisco.

I’d like to ask this guy: If a friend or co-worker came into the same gay bar he’s in, wouldn’t that clue him in that they are gay too? So then what’s the problem with him being there? Why any need for an explanation? What are they doing there if they are not gay too since there is no shortage of straight bars around? Would he grill them on why they are there? Breeders don’t usually make a point of going to gay bars unless they are closet cases themselves.

This guy is so obsessed with what people think, which is one sign of immaturity. One cannot control what people think; people will think what they want. His ad implied that this “amazing lady,” (that he was looking for) brought him to this gay bar and that’s why he’s there. But why is she there and not in a straight bar? Or is she a lesbian, or bisexual? If she’s a lesbian, what is he doing with her? What is she doing with breeder him as his alleged “gf” in a gay bar? Why aren’t they in a straight bar where most straight couples go? Do people not think their lies out carefully? Lying and dishonesty take a lot of work. Or is she really a “fag hag” to a closeted gay boy? Or is this more of that straight people invading/going to gay bars just like they’re invading former gay neighourhoods and giving performances in straight exhibitionism?

Apparently Mr Closeted Millennial thought of none of this when he wrote his gay shame ad and the possible questions that his amigos and co-workers could have based on the message of his ad, which was: “I’m straight and in this gay bar with this ‘amazing (straight) lady’ and I want everyone to believe that.”

The bottom line: El chico and others just like him need some psychotherapy from a credible Queer/GTBQL psychotherapist to deal with his gay shame issues so he and others just like him can feel free to go openly and unashamedly wherever they want to go. Maybe his job will pay for his therapy, no?

There’s only one answer to why you’re in a gay bar. Chau.—el barrio rosa


With Bi and Str8 guys the GF is always out of town

Holding Her Hand, GF Away

“Straights” come to the Castro to cheat

What are the thousands of techie dooshes doing down in Mountain View ?

Hola a todos. Mi amigo/My friend told me he saw fleets of two-story tall white techie shuttles lined up on Market Street (San Francisco) the other morning headed down to Mountain View, the home of predatory G**gle, which owns and has ruined YT. Question: WTF are these thousands of techie dooshes doing down there to earn the exorbitant salaries they are paid? I’ve often wondered: What are they programming or doing — or are these Millennial phone addicts allowed to play on their phones at work all day and get paid for that? — when nothing changes with G**gle or YT? Other than to become worse than it was, such as obnoxious corporate ads saturated all over the place for stupid people to click on. Maybe this tech stuff is so flaky that they have to keep redoing/re-programming what they’ve already programmed hundreds or thousands of times before. It’s just that you don’t see anything changing — in a positive way — so one starts to wonder what are these thousands and thousands of tech dooshes doing down there every day?

If anyone has tried to play a video on YT for some time you know how pathetic videos play now. And the Millennial techie dooshes at G**gle are doing nothing about it. Constant buffering. You try to back up to re-hear a section and chaos occurs. What has been already buffered is completely erased and you have to sit there and wait for it to re-buffer using the pause button. No memory exists, other than maybe 1-2 minutes. There is this new half-circle thing in the middle of the screen (indicating that the video is re-loading) that keeps spinning and spinning and spinning to the point where you think the system is frozen. The video plays a couple of seconds, then stops, plays a couple more seconds, then stops, plays/stops, plays/stops, plays/stops. How many months did these techie dooshes work on that cosmetic, useless spinning thing rather than fixing YT so that it works properly even when using the HD settings (which I’ve learned to rarely use)? I usually use the 480 setting for music videos so I can see the performance and so it’s not blurry. You have to sit there on the pause button for minutes to get a video to re-load. Absolutely useless. And these Millennial techie doosh basura are paid how much annually to afford their pretentious, sterile-looking and overpriced million-dollars-plus “Luxury Designer Condos” (Dahing) and big-tank-sized status-symbol vehicles and their $10.00+ toast and coffee? Dinero/Money means nothing to them. These Millennial basura enjoy throwing dinero down on a hole on over-priced shit based in corporate greed. Los Pendejos.

Oh, and one of these “G**gle shuttles” says on the back that (if I remember correctly): “This bus removes 122 cars off the streets.” That’s a lie. That’s green-washing. Because the bus only has seats for approximately 50 passengers (2 seats per row with 25 rows on each side). During the protests here against — what’s known as — “the G**gle shuttles,” when the door was open I was able to see enough of that shuttle’s interior from the sidewalk to determine the seating arrangement and rows, and I counted approximately 50 seats. Just wanted to point that out. So I have no idea how they figure that they are removing 122 cars from the streets when the bus only holds approximately 50 people. Corporate Liars. Chau.—el barrio rosa

Straight Exhibitionism in The Castro (San Francisco)

“Let’s go make-out in The Castro and annoy the remaining Queers here.” Is that what straight couples say among themselves these days? It seems that way to many people. Why do breeders get a thrill out of making out in The Castro? That’s something some of us cannot understand.

Hola a todos. Some regular readers of pink barrio are probably saying to themselves about now: “Oh not this again. When are you going to get over this, pink barrio? When are you going to let this go?” Answer: Never, probably. I don’t think I’ll ever get over the annoying sight of seeing obnoxious breeders — nearly always Millennials — engaged in their Straight Exhibitionism by making out in what remains of the former gay area known as The Castro.

What do these Millennial breeders think the Rainbow Flags around here are for? Or are they trying to take over the Rainbow Flag too?

We don’t see Straight Exhibitionism anywhere else in The City or Bay Area. It’s just in The Castro, on Market Street near Castro and in Upper Market. Why The Castro? And that is why this Straight Exhibitionism makes no sense to some of us. But these obnoxious breeders absolutely love coming over here to The Castro and giving their morning, matinée and evening performances in Straight Exhibitionism, considering the number of breeder couples that give performances here.

Nearly every time we’re in or around The Castro we see it. For example, there was a breeder couple at the corner of 18th and Castro — “ground-zero” of what was once The Gay Mecca — last Domingo/Sunday afternoon (el 16 de julio de 2017/16 July 2017) giving a matinée on the corner for everyone to see. The usual him-tall/her-short Millennial couple beginning their Straight Exhibitionism display. Their performance began with a drippy make-out session right there on the North-West corner. There they were inconsiderately standing in people’s way and seemingly utterly oblivious to that. Needy-her needed attention once again and immediately so. As she gazed up at him with limpid eyes and he looked way down at her — wouldn’t it be easier if you pendejos were the same height like most gay couples?! — with droopy, limpid eyes and with a slight back and forth head shake, they began their delicate but cautious telenovela-style approach to their quivering lips for a long beso/kiss at the corner of 18th and Castro. Ugh. I WON’T HAVE IT!

The irony here is that for years breeders whined about Queers. They said, “why do ‘the gays’ have to shove their sexuality in our faces?” The reality was that Queers were not “shoving our sexuality in their faces.” We were not barging into straight areas to make-out in front of them because we knew it would not be safe to do so. But for years now, breeder Millennials have been coming over here to The Castro especially on weekends into our own little gay area (what’s left of it) in what seems to be a very deliberate and concerted campaign in Straight Exhibitionism to “shove their straight sexuality in our faces.” And some of us are fucking tired of it!

Also, as part of their Straight Exhibitionism performances in The Castro, these breeder Millennials enjoy walking down the sidewalk in their required hand-in-hand mode, again, “shoving their breeder sexuality in our faces.”

That hand-in-hand routine they do seems to be a security blanket that needy-her requires of him whenever in public, and/or whenever another guy is on the sidewalk within a few feet of her. Is insecure her of the ludicrous thinking that a gay guy is going to rush over and steal her guy from her, or does she think that another breeder guy is going to rush over and steal her from him? (roll eyes). Mis amigos/My friends have told me that they’ve seen and experienced that many times with breeder couples. Here’s the scenario: On the odd occasion, a breeder couple will not be holding hands while walking down the sidewalk. When one of my average-looking, non-threatening-looking guy friends gets closer to them while walking on the sidewalk, she (Ms Breeder) quickly grabs the hand of the guy she’s walking with — sometimes starling him — as if to signal to the guy (my friend) approaching that they are a couple. WTF? Who the fuck cares that they are a couple? Then about 15-30 seconds later after one of my friends has passed them walking in the opposite direction, he covertly looks back at them to see what she does and to observe their behaviour. They go back to not holding hands. So what was that about? What head trip is she on that she needs the security of holding her guy’s hand when another guy passes on the sidewalk? Loca. Is she that terrorised by having another guy pass on the sidewalk? What is wrong with the woman and females like her?

Also, as part of their Straight Exhibitionism, they are sometimes in their arm-in-arm mode. Most gay couples do neither the hand-in-hand or arm-in-arm routine. Gay couples are more secure with their relationships. Or, as part of their Straight Exhibitionism, they walk with his arm “cupped” around her and she’s laying her head on his chest as they walk. That’s quite a sight! I have to say that looks damn uncomfortable to me as a walking position, but they’re usually walking in-step. These breeder Millennials can also be seen standing on street corners, again in people’s way of course and seemingly oblivious. And/or on occasion as part of their Straight Exhibitionism act, tall dominant him has little submissive her — she’s never heard the word feminist — pinned up against a building in a parking lot where they are making out. So he’s bent way over trying to get to her face because of their extreme height differences. Or, they can be seen by the parking meters often exhibiting their raging hormones. These breeder Millennials often look like they just met through some sex app and are desperate to have sexual intercourse right there on the sidewalk as part of their Straight Exhibitionism performance routine. His Millennial small-to-average penis becomes difficult to hide as it’s engorged and tingling in his (usually) super-tight conformist black or gray Millennial Hipster pants with her face only reaching up to approximately his waist level when they are both standing upright.

Some local residents have remarked that they feel like screaming at these breeder Millennials: Take that back to the Marina, los pendejos! These straight exhibitionists also make out in restaurants. Some restaurant customers have complained in their restaurant reviews about them and told them to, “GET A ROOM SOMEWHERE! THERE’S A MOTEL RIGHT DOWN THE STREET!” The problem with that is that Straight Exhibitionist can’t be seen in a motel room and this is all about being seen. These breeder Millennials always seem oblivious to anyone watching them and that’s often the case with people who are into exhibitionism. But their hypocrisy is noted: It’s okay for them to shove their breeder sexuality in our Queer faces, but we Queers were/are not supposed to do the same to them.

After that breeder Millennial make-out spectacle/performance I wrote about earlier at 18th and Castro on Domingo, I saw my straight neighbour on my way home. I was feeling very annoyed and I told him about it. He gave me his thoughts. He said (I’m paraphrasing):

I’ve never felt comfortable making out with a woman anyway in this City in public. I’m just not into doing that, and particularly in The Castro for two reasons: 1. Gay guys are not into watching straights making out and some find it offensive considering The Castro is their little “gay area.” 2. I personally feel it’s disrespecting to the gay community. We straights have anywhere in the world to make out, we don’t need to do that in The Castro. Many or probably most gay couples would not feel comfortable making out in any other part of San Francisco for fear of being hassled, harassed or even being subject to anti-gay violence. I and a woman can make out anywhere so we leave The Castro to the gay community. But personally, we (a woman I’m with) prefer to make out in our homes and not out in public. We don’t need a public audience. We’re not into exhibitionism.

Well, these obnoxious breeder Millennial couples are certainly into exhibitionism. There’s no question about that. It’s surprising that they haven’t thought of setting up multiple cameras on the sidewalk with a production crew — maybe I shouldn’t say this as I don’t want to give them any ideas — and video record their Straight Exhibitionism performances and then upload them to some “porn” site and get off on it, as much public attention as they seem to need and demand.

But gracias to my straight amigo. I found his comment very respectful, as I expected from him.

Queers don’t have the same freedom to go over to Pacific Heights, North Beach or Fisherman’s Wharf or the breeder Marina or any other area of San Francisco and have the luxury of making out without fear of being harassed, hassled and/or subject to violence and/or hearing some anti-gay bigot scream at us: “TAKE THAT BACK TO THE CASTRO!” And I should point out that we Queers can be harassed in The Castro and Upper Market by anti-gay bigots. That’s been happening lately as the Straight Exhibitionism breeder basura continue to move in and take over, and some of them make anti-gay and anti-trans remarks. A couple of months ago, I was walking behind two guys (my gaydar told me they were gay) in The Castro/Upper Market. They started holding hands, and as they did so one of them did what I would do: He turned around and looked back to make sure it was safe to hold hands. Good idea, because San Francisco is not what it was.

Before that performance at 18th and Castro, I saw what looked like to me a Millennial gay guy (closeted?) holding the hand of what looked like to me a Millennial lesbian — but they were pretending to be a straight couple — as they walked down Market Street.

Moments later, I saw another (closeted?) Millennial gay guy, according to my reliable gaydar, walking down Market Street holding hands with a Millennial female, and they too were pretending to be a straight couple.

Then just before that breeder spectacle at 18th and Castro, I saw another Millennial couple in all-white clothing. They looked like tourists, or maybe they were from conservative Walnut Creek? It was clear to me that he was a gay guy despite him holding the hand of the blond female with him. As I passed them, I looked at him and thought: “Who do you think you’re fooling Queer boy by holding her hand and pretending to be a straight couple?” What I saw was another closet case. Maybe he came over here to check out the guys out of the corner of his eye while she wasn’t looking under the guise of, “Let’s go support the gays.”

I later told mi amigo/my friend about all of this. He said: That’s why I don’t like going into The Castro on Domingo/Sunday because of the obnoxious Straight Exhibitionism breeder Millennials making out, as well as the heteronormative gay closet cases. I just get too annoyed.

Earlier that same day, mi amigo told me he saw an unusual scene: another Millennial Straight Exhibitionism couple. He said both were on their phones while making out. They were kissing but both had one arm extended so they could still see their phones while kissing, which is critically important to phone-zombie Millennials. Their phone has replaced their life.

I was wondering: Is this Straight Exhibitionism happening in West Hollywood (WeHo) or Silver Lake in Los Ángeles? I would think so. Why wouldn’t it be? The last I read from down there, Queers were gradually leaving WeHo as breeders were invading and disrespecting their gay area too. Sounds very familiar. So some Queers were/are moving to Long Beach. Here’s what’s happened to Chelsea in New York City (Manhattan): The Death of a Gay Neighborhood, Murdered by Neo-Hetero-Homophobes.

Another observation: On a well-known business review site owned by the techie/venture capitalist dooshes and known for its fake/paid reviews, I’ve certainly noticed all the pictures of breeder couples (they’re usually cheek-to-cheek) for their profile pics. And often, they don’t live anywhere near here. They’re from Tennessee, Texas, New Zealand, the District of Columbia, Vermont and elsewhere. Maybe it’s just me, but I fail to understand why someone who doesn’t live here (as in from another state or the District) would be gushing with 5-stars over a restaurant in San Francisco and writing these article-length reviews to promote a business in another city (and 3,000 miles away on the other coast) that they supposedly have no financial interest in. I suppose some of these reviews could be legit and if so, that could explain some of this Straight Exhibitionism some of us are sick of around here.

Some locals — including myself and mi amigo — think that many breeders come to The Castro to cheat on someone. They do so because they think that The Castro would be the last place that the person they’re cheating on would look for them. The thinking being: “Let’s go fuck in The Castro. My wife (or husband) would never think of looking for me there.” Fin./The End. Chau.—el barrio rosa


I Don’t Go To The “Straight” Marina. So Why Do “Straights” Come to The Castro?


Our US culture worships females with 36-24-36 measurements, but often can’t bare to look at them.

Hola a todos. As the reader may know, we live in a very prudish society here in The Cesspool/Los Estados Unidos/the US. A society very afraid of seeing the human body, and especially women’s breasts — it’s as if no one has ever seen women’s breasts before and deeply fear them — and so many people have body-image issues. “Cover up, cover up, don’t show any skin,” and that’s especially true for guys.

I was reading an article about some women going topless at a beach on the East Coast en Los Estados Unidos/the US only to be hated on by most people — except for young guys — because the women were showing their breasts, including the ever-feared nipples. Horrors! Imagine having to see nipples! Nipples of all things! And as usual, the (conservative) prudes screamed, “WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN?” Well what about them, prudes? Is a child harmed in any way by seeing the human body and in this instance, two breasts on a woman’s chest? I. Don’t. Think. So.

Get. A. Grip.

I would like to remind people that children are born with a “clean slate.” Children are born without any prejudices of any kind, without any hang-ups and without any “issues” that twisted adults have been brainwashed/programmed with. If a child’s mind hasn’t already been contaminated by some prudish so-called “adult,” and if the child even notices a woman’s breasts, the child would see her breasts no differently than the child sees the nose on her face, or sees her arms or any other part of her body. Until a child has been programmed/taught by some uptight, prudish, messed-up humans with body image issues that it’s “bad” or “naughty” (roll eyes) to see a woman’s breasts, the child will have absolutely no problem seeing the breasts and will think nothing of them. When children look at men’s breasts there is no big deal at all about that. And in some cases, “man boobs” can be bigger than women’s boobs.

I saw my grandmother’s breasts a few times by accident as a child when she was staying with our family on occasion and changing her clothes. Seeing her breasts didn’t have any negative effect on me at all. They were just rather large breasts. No big deal. But that changed when she scolded me — as I happened to walk through the room she was in on my way to another room — and she told me not to look at her when changing her clothes. That was a big mistake on her part. It backfired on her. By her scolding me, it made me more curious and made me want to look at her. If she had said nothing, I would not have been curious. But because she said something about it and didn’t want me to look at her, I wanted to see whatever it was that she didn’t want me to see and was so off-putting. And that’s the way children are. So it’s the children in adult bodies — the screwed-up parents and/or grandparents with body-image issues and/or who see parts of the human body as entirely sexual or “naughty”/bad — who have the problem with this. So all of this nonsense about “what about the children?” is just a pathetically lame excuse used by septic prudes so that they, the so-called “adult,” don’t have to see boobs because they have been brainwashed to think that “boobs are ‘naughty.’” As if boobs are only connected with sex. And the same twisted people often think that sex is bad. The so-called “adults” are the ones who have a problem with seeing boobs because of their messed-up upbringing. It’s as if most women are ashamed of their own breasts and their own body.

I’ve never found women’s breasts particularly attractive — but I have no problem looking at them — especially in sex video scenes where the female’s boobs look like two floppy balloons hanging down off of her. I don’t find that a sexual turn-on at all. But breeder guys do. They’ve been brainwashed that they are supposed to be into boobs and vagina, whether or not they find boobs or vagina “hot.” To be considered “normal,” breeder guys have also been indoctrinated that they must be into having oral sex with vagina, although that’s a real turn-off for some breeder guys because they say it’s like licking a toilet seat because the vagina is located right next to the anus. And these breeder guys say: “Yuck, nasty.” Breeder guys often call a woman’s boobs “her rack” as a sexual turn-on. So again, breeder guys think they must be into boobs and vagina in order to be considered “normal.”

Why do most people become prudes after they have a child?

That’s the way it seems. After someone has a child they become a rather conservative prude, even though they may call themselves “a liberal.” Well, these days, people call themselves anything whether it has any basis in reality or not. But these people weren’t a prude before they started squeezing out babies. They seem to forget what they did in their past and now want to forbid their child from doing what they did. They’re call Hypocrites. Why was it all right for these so-called “adults” to do what they did in their past, but it’s not all right for their child to do the same? And you tell a child that s/he shouldn’t be looking at something and the child will be even more curious about it.

Some people should not be parents frankly because they don’t have a clue how to be a parent, and I’m not talking about love here. All they do is pass down generational prejudices, body-image and sexual hang-up issues and prudish beliefs that they’ve been brainwashed with from their parents. These are some of the same people who start spelling sex words when talking with their close friends and when their child is around. It’s as if these parents don’t think their child will be curious what their parent is spelling. For example, the parent will say to a close amigo: “We f-u-c-k-e-d last night while watching that s-e-x video you loaned us.” The child then might ask: “Daddy, what are you spelling?” Had the dad just said the word “fuck” and “sex” to begin with he wouldn’t have been questioned by the child. Parents fail to understand that when a child does not know the definition of words (such as the meaning of the word “fuck” or “sex”), the child will not know that the word “fuck” or “sex” is any different than the word “table” or “book,” nor will the child give any special attention to the word “fuck” or “sex” in the sentence because, again, neither word has any (special) meaning to the child. But we have no shortage of clueless, moronic parents in our US society. And if the child already knows the meaning of the words “fuck” or “sex,” then he’s already way ahead of you prudish mommy and daddy, if you get my point. Many children learn about sex and sex language very early, from their amigos, from school, and what they happen to overhear from their parents when their parents are not sanitising themselves in front of their children.

And I would also like to point out that these prudish parents are often some of the same basura that call themselves a Christian. These fake-Christians — they’re often what I call “Navidad/Christmas and Pascua/Easter Christians” meaning they only show up at church twice a year — say that their Christian God made the human body and that God is perfect. Okay, hold that thought. I’m going to expose some gaping holes in your Christian theology. Apparently they think their God made something “evil” and “naughty” because they are so terribly afraid of seeing women’s boobs and nipples that their God made, according to their beliefs. But men’s boobs and nipples are perfectly acceptable for children to look at. Again, the hypocrisy is noted. And people are not born with clothes on to “cover up” what their “perfect” Christian God made. So, why are these fake-Christians so terribly afraid of seeing what their “perfect” God made? Hmmmmmmmmmm? Obviously they think he made something bad/”naughty” and that’s why they fear children looking at the human body that they believe their perfect God made? Again, their hypocrisy is noted. I would think fake-Christians would like to show the wonder, “the miracle” that their God made known as the nude human body, rather than desperately wanting to cover it up from head to toe as if it’s “evil” and “naughty.” What is it about a woman’s breast that is so off-putting and that “we” can’t show it in public? Is it the thickness, the density, or the ever-feared nipple? Or how big the discoloured circle is around the nipple? Is it the colour of the breasts and the woman who is attached to the breasts? Ah, maybe. When National Geographic publishes articles about Africa, they are perfectly fine with showing brown and black breasts hanging off of women (nipples, circle and all!) But when we’re in The Cesspool/the US or an Asian country, no breasts are ever shown. Extremely Taboo in the Prudish US of Hypocrisy.

Well, I have absolutely no patience for prudes. None whatsoever. Prudes are part of what is wrong with the US. This is such a backward, puritanical nation. So afraid of seeing what “their Christian God” (according to them) made in what they erroneously claim to be “a Christian nation.” Ha! I’m tired of reading frequent headlines about some woman who had a “wardrobe malfunction” or “her dress was too revealing” and other nonsense. I never hear the same said about guys, that “his shirt was too revealing” or that “he had a wardrobe malfunction.” I read a headline the other day about a woman who was breastfeeding and some busy-bodied prude interrupted her by asking, “Could you please stop breastfeeding your child? You’re making many of us uncomfortable.” Well that’s your problem/issue do deal with isn’t it? If breastfeeding is making someone uncomfortable, that’s the prudish problem of the person who is feeling uncomfortable. Not the mother who is breastfeeding.

Then there are the prudes that want to “cover up” public statues showing the naked human body. It’s a statue people. Get. A. Grip. What harm is that statue going to do? And if you don’t want to see the statue, pivot your prudish head in the opposite direction. Can you not do that? But what is most often the case with these prudish trash, is that they stand there with their hand over their gaping mouth and their eyes bugged-out while they stare and stare and stare at what they claim they find offensive/repulsive. Well, what they’re staring at for minutes at a time must not be that “repulsive” to them since they stare at it for such a long time, probably to get a good mental image of it so they can go home and think about it when they’re masturbating. And how much “porn” do they look at online?

This reminds me of when we had the ugly and hateful campaign for the ludicrous city-wide nudity ban in San Francisco — which was approved by the way — because of a few nudists (1-5 people occasionally, including some women) in San Francisco’s Castro, the former Gay Mecca, and a barrio/neighbourhood with a long history of occasional public nudity. I should also point out that the campaign for the city-wide nudity ban was led by what remains of the now very conservative and prudish Queer/GTBQL community in San Francisco’s Castro. I observed some gay guys sneering at and bullying the few nudists in Jane Warner Plaza at Castro/Market Streets. Those gay guys had forgotten or didn’t even know their own Queer history and the Queer history of the former Gay Mecca with its public nudity. If one didn’t know any better, one would think these bullying gay guys had just gotten off a plane from some conservative backwater cesspool by observing their immature and obnoxious behaviour. And the stuff the conservative basura were making up about the nudists was absurd. They wrote of how “repulsed” they were with the nudists and how they saw “semen coming out of the penis of the nudists.” Oh lord. How’d you happen to see that? Well, they must not have been that repulsed by it if they were able to get such a microscopic, close-up look — did they stand directly in front of the nudist and look down at his penis and examine it for semen ? — and keep staring and staring and staring and staring to supposedly see semen or pre-semen coming out of his flaccid penis? None of which was true of course, but the conservative basura are well-known for their outrageous fictional stories they create whenever they hate on something (and they’re constantly hating on something; they couldn’t even exist if there were not some person to hate on), while they watch hours of internet porn looking at women’s breasts, as well as penises oozing and ejaculating semen, and other sexual interests. One of the local conservative merchants, the prudish owner of a certain well-known store in The Castro that was here all during the Gay Mecca days, said she didn’t want her granddaughter seeing naked people when she was coming home from school. Then move witch! (No disrespect intended to genuine witches). There are planes leaving San Francisco daily. No one is forcing prudish you and your granddaughter with your absolute fear of seeing the human body to live here. You would be much more comfortable in some backwater cesspool conservative hick town.

Should guys start wearing bras to cover up their breasts/their “evil” nipples? Hmmmmmmmm? A woman’s breasts are no different than a guy’s breast other than the woman’s breasts are generally larger — but not always — and they either protrude or sag. Because a woman’s breasts protrude that makes them “evil” and “naughty” and causes prudes to fear them? Loco. Yet another double-standard here in the Prudish US of Hypocrisy. I would like to think that maybe one day in some future decade this prudishness will all disappear. But I’m a realists, and I don’t see that happening. Instead, I see the Prudish US of Hypocrisy going in the opposite direction and heading towards Dark Ages II.

For example, while completing this article I read the following:

“The Wedgie Bottom Is the Summer’s Most-Controversial Bikini Trend”
(roll eyes) It seems that the prudes in the US have something else to complain about when it comes to seeing the female human body. They are not happy with the “wedgie” bikini bottom. It’s referred to as a “cheeky bikini bottom” that’s in this Summer (2017). Apparently some females are wearing a regular-cut bikini bottom and scrunching it up into “cheeky area” (gasp!) and this disturbs the prudes enormously, even if she is 36-24-36. Their prudish eyes are unable to look anywhere else but that woman’s buttocks. As I said, we’re heading towards Dark Ages II rather quickly. Chau.—el barrio rosa

The Lesbians are straight ?

Hola a todos. Yes, I know this topic is getting very old. I feel the same way. When I started this article, I said: Why even bother writing about it?!

There’s been some changes in my apartment building in San Francisco and my lesbian next door neighbour and I were talking about them. Two lesbians have been living on the top floor of our building for a few years. They were referred to our building by other lesbians that knew the building manager. My next door neighbour got word that they are moving. Another tenant in the building talked with them and he told me that one was moving in with her husband (a guy). She’s moving in with her husband? Her husband? A lesbian is moving in with her husband? Where did this “husband” come from? The other lesbian who is staying is having her boyfriend move in with her. Her boyfriend? Her boyfriend?

There has got to be something in the water.

My next door neighbour’s reaction was the same as mine. When I told her about this “husband” and “boyfriend” she flipped out and said: “What? They’re straight? I’ve talked with them many times, I thought they were both lesbians. I thought they were a lesbian couple.” Yes, I did too. They look like — what is called in the Queer community — “bull dykes.” And they act like bull dykes. I said to my neighbour: Now you watch, at the rate things are going, this boyfriend will be a Queer boy who is dating a lesbian. Or, they’ve both gone back in the closet. The far-right can now take comfort in knowing that they can abandon their gay conversion therapy because gay guys and lesbians have their own self-imposed conversion therapy in response to their self-hate over being Queer/GTBQL? My neighbour said: “Yeah, what is going on with the gay guys I see around here who are dating women and having relationships with women?” I said: Oh you’ve noticed that too? It’s the latest fad, didn’t you know? And note the irony: They worked for gay marriage for years and after that was accomplished they went back in the closet and are pretending to be breeders/straight. Script writers couldn’t make this shit up. She said, “What is going on with people? Are they totally flipping out.” I said: Uh huh. Seems so. I think there’s something in the water, don’t you?

These days, whenever I see a guy that I instinctively know is a Queer boy, I now assume and expect that he’s married to a female and in the closet, until proven otherwise. And it’s only fairly recently (within the last year or so) that I’ve come to this thinking and it’s based on all that I’ve seen repeatedly on television and locally. I’ll see a guy on television and I instinctively know he’s Queer. He then mentions “my wife and I.” I think: Oh here we go again with “the wife and I” pretending to be Mr Breeder! They always have to say that to let the viewing audience know they’re straight, or pretending to be. And the Queers that I know to be out of the closet rarely mention their partners/spouse to the viewers. It’s as if they’re only partly “out.” It’s as if they want the viewer to keep believing that they’re a breeder as if the viewer will be offended if the viewer learns that he’s gay and that might harm his career/reputation. I heard a female caller to a programme recently tell a gay male clothing designer that, “It’s obvious that you love women.” WTF? He said: “What a nice thing for you to say.” (roll eyes) Well, just a little bit of online research confirms that he’s supposedly “out” and he and his boyfriend got married awhile back and some of their marriage pictures are online. But he chose to remain the customary “discreet” and “down low” (translation: in the closet) with this caller. He could have said to her, “Well I’m gay — (unspoken): and I thought everybody knew that from watching me on this network and you must be completely out-of-it if you didn’t pick up on it, jesus! — and I do enjoy designing clothes for women, and thank you for calling in.” Apparently he wanted this caller to think he’s straight so that she will keep buying his clothes.

And the more fem the guy is, I have found that they have a wife and some talk about “our kids.” The thousands and thousands of gay closet cases out there.

Our little group of local San Francisco Queers got together last month (junio/June) and we talked about this topic. We concluded that probably half if not more of the Queer/GTBQL community today is in the closet in 2017 and that includes all the closet cases married to females who have already married females and gay guys who are continuing to marry females to follow “The Family Script,” and cave to societal pressure for them to be breeders. One day they may come out of the closet with a big mess on their hands, including but not limited to: a messy divorce with clueless and/or in denial her doing a lot of screaming (“How could you do this to me; why didn’t you tell me you were gay all along?” Duh.), who gets what? (house, furniture, dinero/money, etc.), lots of dysfunction and arguing, child support, some very scarred children because of the divorce, and so forth. If only the gay guy had had the strength and maturity to value his own life from the beginning — rather than other people’s “script”/plans for him — to come out of the closet, he could have avoided all of that.

I’ve read comments from a few local lesbians saying that they can’t tell who is a lesbian anymore because most lesbians are trying to look like heteronormative straight women and some lesbians are even going to straight bars. To presumably meet women? Loca. Chau.—el barrio rosa

Why does there have to be a “greatest country ?”

Hola a todos. I was disgusted recently by a partisan comedian who opened his skit with the comment: “The US is the greatest country on Earth.” Then he repeated it. (I thought: Here we go again.) What an obnoxious thing to say as well as terribly arrogant. Unfortunately, no one in the devoutly partisan audience hissed at him or was offended by it. Being partisans, and since the comment was coming from “one of their own,” they cheered mindlessly and loudly for him like good little brainwashed Democratic Party sheeple. It was sad that this comedian resorted to ugly US nationalism to begin his skit.

Why do people in the US have to keep telling themselves how “great” they are? WTF is that about? It’s as if they have to continually beat their chest and pump themselves up to make themselves feel better and more important than all other people en el mundo/in the world. It’s a strong sign of insecurity frankly.

Because people who are secure with themselves and who are truly great and accomplished people don’t feel the need to strut around with this, “I’m the greatest; I’m the best person on the planet” way of thinking. Well the same thing goes for nations.

And when a country has to consistently resort to touting how supposedly “great” is it as the US constantly does, you know something is very wrong. One should question that. It’s an indicator of an immature country that is not great, but pretends to be.

Those who have been paying attention know that the US is crumbling from within. Not great.

A truly great and mature country would not need to keep reassuring itself of its supposed greatness. Truly great and mature countries are modest and humble, not arrogant, and they allow others to speak of their greatness, and in return politely say, “Muchas Gracias/Thank You.” But the immature and juvenile, stupid-is-in US has to keep beating its chest and keep going on about how “great” it thinks it is. It reminds me of El Hombre Naranja/The Orange Man frankly.

Why does there have to be a “greatest country?”

There are many great countries all over the globe. Some far better and more advanced in many ways than the US. Travel a little bit and one will understand that, assuming one travels with an open and objective mind. In some/many ways, the US is quickly returning to being an undeveloped nation: about to lose what “health care” they have, lose their clean water, lose their Environmental Protection Agency, lose the rights to a “free press/media,” lose human rights, some of our major transport systems are falling apart, the New York City subway, for example, and the District of Columbia’s Metro and others. Our education system is in shambles since education is no longer valued and intellectualism is now a “bad word” because stupid-is-in, and I could go on. The US is also very close to a nuclear war with North Korea. But most people in the US couldn’t tell you about any of this. All they know is that phone that’s in their face 24/7 as they play mindless games for hours, scroll through tons of sex pics and live their lives on billionaire-owned “social media” (the headquarters for many people with no genuine social skills) and helping a billionaire make more billions. Related: “Vladan Joler says that all F***Book users are effectively working on behalf of the company.”

Wanna-be “Pop star” Obama was big on strutting around with this nonsense as well. He made the obnoxious comment during the 2012 presidential debate that the US remains the one indispensable nation. What a terribly arrogant thing to say. And the logical response to that ugly statement is: Which nations are dispensable, Obama? Do tell. Which nations would you like to deeply offend by naming the countries you deem dispensable? I can’t think of any. I suspect he couldn’t either and would stand there with his mouth hanging open thinking, “Oh I guess I shouldn’t have said that while I was trying to feed the egos of US’ans.”

And this is indeed all about feeding the fragile egos of the sheeple in the US. Keep telling them they’re special. They have to be constantly told that because of their short attention span. And most US’ans expect el mundo/the world to constantly genuflect to us because we’ve been told repeatedly that we’re “the greatest country on Earth,” and many sheeple in this country are stupid enough to believe it. Most of whom couldn’t find any of the 8 countries the US is currently at war with on a map. The painfully-ignorant conservatives are often the ones who scream, “USA #1, USA #1″ to make themselves feel better. And that’s what this tacky comment from this comedian reminded me of.

There are also those nationalistic ignorant people who say, “My country right or wrong.” What fool would defend and stand by a country when it’s wrong?

The US has done some terrible things, some very heinous things in its history. The US is the #1 terrorist nation on the planet, causing the most death and destruction of any nation on the planet. The US Oligarchy and its corporate parasite politicians (both Democratic and Republican) think nothing of terrorising the innocent people of other nations — based on the Oligarchy’s cooked-up lies and dutifully repeated without any questions asked by the corporate media — killing thousands of innocent people in other nations in order to steal their natural resources from them and/or to install a government favourable to US interests, in the name of “bringing freedom and democracy” to said nation. What nonsense. In reality, the US Oligarchy doesn’t care about freedom or democracy in its own country. The US of Hypocrisy is what the nation should be called.

If this comedian and people just like him would do a bit of travelling and actually see the world, if he were to keep an objective and open mind, he might realise that the US is not the “greatest country.” It just arrogantly thinks it is.

It sort of mirrors what the US installed en la casa blanca/in the White House as its electoral college-elected president. In other words, what El Hombre Naranja/The Orange Man is, is what the US has become. That’s why he’s currently occupying la casa blanca. In many ways, the US mirrors what El Hombre Naranja is. And the standing of the US en el mundo has diminished under el hombre-niño/the man-child. Chau.—el barrio rosa

The Orange Man and his supporters hate the US

Hola a todos. I’ve never seen anything like it, I don’t think any of us have, and it’s getting worse by the day. I don’t usually talk about politics since I prefer to keep my blood pressure in a healthy range, but I feel the need to make mention of this.

There’s a belligerent, out-of-control bullying child with major violent-based mental issues in an adult body en la casa blanca/in the White House. For anyone who has been paying even reasonably close attention since El Hombre Naranja/The Orange Man took up occupancy en la casa blanca after somehow winning the electoral college vote but losing the popular vote — and to his rabid supporters: No, I’m not “sulking” because Queen Hillary was not s-elected since I didn’t support her — one knows that El Hombre Naranja is quickly dismantling the US, its laws and regulations which is indicative of his strong, deep-seated hate for this country and his determination to drastically change it over the next 8 years, which he has already started doing. I can hear the denialists say, “He’ll never be re-elected.” I would like to point out that it was the denialists who said he would never be “elected” in the first place. That’s why I wrote this article: ¿El Hombre Naranja Presidente? during the septic 2016 campaign. But yes, he can easily be “re-elected” (wink, wink) in our corrupt and sham of a system. What he’s doing includes such things as rolling back clean water protections, as well as the latest death bill to repeal Obamacare — Obama’s corporate bail-out to the mangled “Health Care” Industrial Complex — where millions of people will lose their outrageously expensive “health care” coverage.

El Hombre Naranja is continuing the global barbaric US imperialism of the Bush-Obama regimes, which he campaigned against. Just like with Obama, El Hombre Naranja/The Orange Man couldn’t wait to start killing innocent people. How many people has he killed so far? He claims to be a Christian (don’t they all?) but missed the commandment in the bible about, “Thou Shalt Not Kill.” It’s a pretty straight-forward four-word commandment. What part of that does he not understand? And despite his claim to be a Christian, he certainly doesn’t show it in his daily life. He doesn’t set the examples of Jesus, from what we’ve been told about Jesus from scholared people. El Hombre Naranja is one of the fake — what I call — “Christmas and Easter Christians.” They are the so-called Christians who only show up at a church twice a year on a special occasion. He’s merely using Christianity to “play” the far-right evangelicals. Not being the brightest people, they seem to have fallen for him. On Sunday mornings when this fake-Christian should be in church he’s wasting his time playing on Twi**e* bullying and insulting the corporate media and others.

His stupid supporters will be affected by his dismantling of this country but they’re too thick to understand that. They really are among the most stupid people we have in the US. One recent example of that is that some of his supporters were interviewed recently by a major East Coast news site after El Hombre Naranja had a campaign rally — for those who haven’t been paying close attention, he’s holding unprecedented campaign rallies for his 2020 re-election after only 5 months in office of his first term, as of this writing. His supporters told the reporter that:

“Finally, AmerrrrrrrrrrriKKKa is highly regarded all around the world.”

¿Qué? What?

Which América are they talking about? I will have to assume they are talking about:

1. América del Sur or South América as being highly regarded all around the world, or
2. América Central (Central América).

They can’t possibly be talking about The Cesspool/Los Estados Unidos or the United States of América.

A brief aside: I get so tired of people calling this country (the US) “America.” Why? Because “America” is the name of the entire hemisphere. Someone may say, “But everybody does it. Everybody calls the US ‘America.’” Just because “everybody does it,” that makes it right? As my many Latino/Hispano amigos/amigas often astutely say: “the US is a country with no name.” It’s officially known as the ‘United States of América.’” What they mean by that is that the US does not have a name like any other countries, such as: México, Colombia, Brazil, Argentina, España, Guatemala, Honduras, Britain, France, Greece, China, and many others. The US is a group of forty-nine continuous states in the hemisphere called América. They are technically in América del Norte or North América. Nobody ever had the intelligence to come up with a name for this country, so the “United States of America” ended up being the name of the country. And those 49 states are “united” by being next to each other and officially comprise the country. The fiftieth state, Hawaii, is legally part of the United States but is not in the hemisphere called América, so people in Hawaii cannot say they are Americanos or “Americans.” At one time, people in Europe referred to this country as “the States,” which is cool. That’s what they are: States. But I’ve noticed that they too in Europe are now using the word “America.” I don’t expect to change one mind by what I’m saying here and I expect most people, if not everyone, will continue using the language they currently use. In the past, when I’ve brought this up on message forums, I was met with 100% resistance, especially from the conservatives/far-right. This is just one of our pet peeves, in part, because it’s sloppy language: Calling a country the name of the hemisphere is rather ridiculous. And we don’t understand why people insist on using the word “America” when “US” (just two letters) is so much easier to type. Canada had the intelligent to choose a name for their country. They could call themselves “America” too since they are in América, North América, specifically. México could call themselves América too — hearing that should really piss off the anti-immigrant basura among us — because México is in North América. If one travels a bit throughout the Américas (especially throughout América del Sur), one knows that people there refer to themselves as Americanos and they very much resent the US and US’ans arrogantly thinking that they own the word “América” and are the only Americanos in the hemisphere.

Therefore, if the stupid disciples of El Hombre Naranja are talking about the United States of América, they are highly mistaken because the US is not at all highly regarded all around the world now under El Hombre Naranja. Apparently they missed all the noticias/news about how badly things went with his recent international trip where he met with other world leaders, including his awkward meetings with German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Or was all of that considered “fake news” to his stupid supporters? To them, any noticias that is not positive of their messiah El Hombre Naranja, is “fake news.” Did the misogynistic, sexist, racist, redneck (El Hombre Naranja) pronounce Angela Merkel’s name correctly when he met her? I suspect not. Her name is not an English name nor is it correctly pronounced as such. As was expected before he left, he was embarrassing on his international trip.

El hombre/The man is a constantly angry-looking embarrassment, especially his latest multi-day (as of this writing) juvenile attack on the two co-hosts of a corporate media morning show. Then he incited violence with a message he wrote on 140 character Twi**e* (the site he lives on) of a juvenile fake wrestling video of him violently body-slamming/beating up another corporate media network which he has a major hard-on for, calling them “fraud news.” Not at all presidential. That’s the behaviour of an out-of-control internet troll. The type that “lives in his mother’s basement” to use their own script back at them.

This man-child is sick. But his proudly willfully-ignorant supporters say they don’t care what the rest of el mundo/the world thinks about him or the US. A really stupid thing to say. They fail to understand the many ramifications and consequences of such lack of credibility and world respect.

El Hombre Naranja has quite an obsession going on with Mr Nobel Peace Prize Obama (who left office with 8 wars in progress). That obsession is unprecedented too. El Hombre Naranja is constantly bullying Obama and dismantling much of what Obama did. I don’t know if Obama has noticed the bullying since Obama’s been too busy luxuriating and partying with Oprah and Hollywood celebrities. I read that Oprah is considering running for president in 2020. Oh yes why not! The era of wealthy corporate media celebrities running for president. Obama received a $400,000 speaking fee and he and Ms Obama signed a millionaire-dollar book deal after leaving office. The Obamas have been busy buying a $8.1 million mansion (Dahling) in the District of Columbia (the District), in Upper Northwest. It’s the same house they rented for awhile. It’s a very small house with only 8,200 sq. ft. and just 9.5 bathrooms. Can someone tell me why they need nine and one-half bathrooms for four people? Even if all four of them are in a bathroom at the same time, there are 5.5 bathrooms left over. And even if they have 5 guests staying with them, will all 5 guests be in a separate bathroom at the same time? I’d like to see that! Well no I wouldn’t really. I just find it rather wasteful and pretentious. Nobody needs 9.5 bathrooms for four people. What is wrong with people? Well, this is all about status and trying to impress other shallow people who are easily impressed by wealth and materialistic garbage. I can hear the employees at the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority saying, “Watch out, here it comes, all 9.5 bathrooms of the Obama mansion in Upper Northwest just flushed their toilets.” The Obama’s neighbours include some relatives of El Hombre Naranja, and the billionaire founder of Am*z*n. How wonderful that the bougi and wealthy can all be together luxuriating (Dahling). The Obama’s house looks rather sterile inside with mostly conformist all-white, gray, black interiors. Nothing remotely “rad.” But then I wouldn’t expect anything “rad” from the Obamas. The very typical conservative and boring/bland conformist colours of today. Very little colour at all really. Another example of wealthy people with absolutely no taste. Mi amigo/My friend (who was a very successful and in demand building contractor, now retired) saw the pictures of the house interior and said, “It’s hideously ugly inside. There’s so much that could be done with that house, especially with beautiful colours.” I would describe their house as pretentious, bougi and elitist. It doesn’t look at all “warm” or welcoming at all. It looks more like a corporate showroom. There’s also a two-car garage and outdoor parking for 10 vehicles. How environmental. I take it they don’t use public transport (the Metrobus or the District’s Metro). One wonders where they got that dinero/money since the office of president doesn’t pay anywhere close to $8.1 million. The Obamas say they plan to spend another 2.5 years in the District — WHY? So he can run for yet another office to continue his and her head trip about how, “We Obamas are so very important to The People. The People desperately want us to run for yet another office. They can’t get enough of us very important people. We’re now celebrities and we adore the celebrity attention they give us” — yet I had read they were going to live in Palm Springs. What happened to that? Couldn’t get the celebrity attention there? Other than what I’ve said here about them, I’ve given no thought to the Obamas. I was hoping they would just go away the way former presidents have. I only looked into the details of their new house because I thought readers might find it interesting. He’s out of office so why give him any thought? He’s as corrupt as all the others. Most presidents rarely mention former presidents and what they did. But this off-the-latch guy, El Hombre Naranja, is not like any president we’ve ever had before, nor is he like illegitimate George W Bush.

El Hombre Naranja is not presidential material. I suspect most people have figured that out by now. He remains the obnoxious, ignorant blow-hard he was during the 2016 campaign: an out-of-control, angry, cruel, extremely immature bully constantly thriving on dysfunction and attention. He’s an ill-mannered, uncivil, ill-behaved, narcissistic child is an overweight adult body. He doesn’t believe in exercise and he enjoys eating lots of dead animals with ketchup on them. And at least one of his sons is just as unhinged and juvenile. His rabid supporters are just like him. Like attracts like. I know from personal experience with the basura on message forums. I would suggest intense psycho-dynamic psychotherapy to El Hombre Naranja, but I don’t think even the most credible doctorate-level therapist could do anything with him. Some people are beyond help, and to get help the person has to want help, and in this instance El Hombre Naranja thinks he knows it all. He would quickly dismiss anything from a therapist as “fake news.”

El Hombre Naranja is constantly lying and making up his own set of “facts” as he goes. His early-morning — midnight and thereafter when most people on the East Coast are asleep — routine of trolling/ranting on Twi**e* has become legendary. I don’t know why Twi**e* doesn’t close his account since he has already incited violence on their platform, but I suspect they love the attention he gives them. He’s finally made them somewhat relevant. The corporate media network he attacked contacted Twi**e* and they said he did not violate their policies because there are many ways to interpret what he did. How mealy-mouthed of them. And when someone is specifically inciting violence as he did, shouldn’t that be enough to suspend his account? I bet if you or I had put the same thing on Twi**e*, there wouldn’t have been “many ways to interpret it.” Our account would have been suspended immediately. But one should expect the techie basura to eat the ass of The Orange Man. As expected, the supporters of El Hombre Naranja have defended his inciting of violence on Twi**e*. They claim that other presidents have also incited violence, so in their mind — the word “mind” used advisedly — that makes what he did right. Even if other presidents did incite violence, the fools never learned that “two wrongs don’t make a right.” I thought that was something that most people learned in elementary school. But one gets the distinct impression that the minions of El Hombre Naranja never went to any school.

Then to see the injustices of the US Supreme Court bow to him in their 9-0 ruling on the Muslim travel ban was disgraceful. The next time you hear the Democrats scream: “Remember the Supreme Court! Remember the Supreme Court!” as their #1 reason for voting for their corporate and imperialistic presidential nominee, remind them of this ruling — and most likely future rulings — because the so-called “liberals,” everyone of them on that court — Democratic appointees Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer — voted with the conservatives and bowed to El Führer/El Hombre Naraja, as I predict they will do in the future. Why wouldn’t they? The Democrats and so-called “liberals” (fake-liberals/fake-progressives) often work for los Republicanos. They work for their corporate owners. Where are the Democratic Party sheeple now on this Supreme Court ruling? Silent. Because just like the disciples of El Hombre Naranja, the Democrats inherently think they can’t criticise their own. They are as thin-skinned as the know-nothing supporters of El Hombre Naranja. The Democrats should also stop telling people: “You have to vote; every vote counts” and how important it is to vote in this thoroughly corrupt sham of a system. Because if every vote counted, Hillary wouldn’t be spending her days sitting at home since la mujer/the woman received 3 MILLION more votes (that we know of) than did El Hombre Naranja.

Also, The regime of El Hombre Naranja did not honour Queer/GTLBQ Pride Month in junio/June 2017, which should come as no shock to anyone who paid attention during the septic 2016 presidential campaign. These are anti-Queer/GTLBQ people. Earlier this year I remember commenting with a rabid supporter of The Orange Man and the person claimed to be a Queer guy with a partner. They had fallen for The Orange Man’s stunt when he held of a Rainbow Flag (upside down) during the campaign. That’s all they needed to see to believe in him. I wish I could remember the details of that, but it was not how it appeared, I read later. In other words, he wasn’t holding the Rainbow Flag to show that he was pro-Queer. But it mattered not what I said and evidence to the contrary, the allegedly-Queer guy I was commenting with and his partner were going to believe that El Hombre Naranja loves them as a Queer couple. I even pointed out that The Orange Man’s nominee to the US Supreme Court — who now sits on that court — said that it should be illegal for gay people to have sex. That didn’t phase this guy either. He chose Denial. But in the end, I felt I had been trolled by one of his rabid supporters and that the person I was commenting with was not Queer at all and there was no partner. He was just trying to convert me. Although I’m well aware that there are some GTLBQs who support El Hombre Naranja. That would have to be from a position of self-hate and internalised homophobia.

It looks like El Hombre Naranja may not be going to the UK after all. Good. What an international embarrassment that would be. The Queen said nothing about it in The Queen’s Speech at the opening of Parliament 2017 following the snap election, although she mentioned other guests who would be visiting in the coming year, but he wasn’t one of them.

As I said earlier, this man dysfunctional and out-of-control child in a man’s body is already campaigning for 2020. He’s already held a re-election campaign fundraiser dinner which cost $35,000 plate at his own hotel in the District. He’s having a fundraiser for the GOP — again at his hotel in the District; isn’t that a conflict of interest? — which is expected to raise $10 million USD.

From reading the few trite and juvenile comments I’ve been able to read recently from his nasty supporters, the disciples of El Hombre Naranja are continuing to call anyone who oppose their messiah a “snowflake” and that’s written in their very patronising trollish style. Their behaviour mirrors that of the Obamabots after he took office, although the Obamabots didn’t use the term “snowflake.” But the behavior of blind devotion and blinders-on unconditional support for their new-found messiah figure is exactly the same as what the Obamabots did. The disciples of El Hombre Naranja are also frequently talking about how they’re “winning” as if they’re cheering a team in a corporate spectator sports event. All of this “winning” they claim to be doing. They also live under the false illusion that all Democrats are “liberals,” which they must have picked up from some very ignorant, far-right overpaid gas bag parked at a microphone (they’re typically called talk show hosts). The notion that all Democrats are liberal is of course ludicrous, and in their simple minds anyone who opposes El Hombre Naranja is a Democrat. That’s not true either. I know someone who is a staunch Republican who can’t stand him, but explaining that to them would be beyond them.

El Hombre Naranja wrote in el 3 de julio de 2017/3 July 2017 message on Twi**e* that, “America’s men & women in uniform is [sic] the story of FREEDOM overcoming OPPRESSION…” That’s the lying propaganda that the far-right nationalists consistently spew. And he’s against freedom. He’s for oppression. What remaining freedoms we have are guaranteed in the US Constitution, not in people wearing uniforms of the barbaric Military Industrial Complex. Our freedoms, again, guaranteed in the Constitution have nothing to do with rank US imperialism and barbarism. When The Cesspool/the US goes to war or launches another terrorist attack on a sovereign nation, it is not to protect the US Constitution, but rather it’s for US hegemony and Empire building of the PNAC agenda.

I read while writing this article that he’s making the mistake of playing solely to his base. And his base cheers for and serves as obedient bootlickers for anything and all things he does, no matter how outrageous, heinous and childish. The children in adult bodies are right there supporting him. The problem with this is that his base is very small. According to all research, including polls, his base is just a small group of Republican voters. Mi amigo said his base is mainly the Alex Jones crowd. But it is clear that he and his base hate the US. His supporters desperately want the US turned into a dictatorship. Wouldn’t it be a bit easier and faster for them to move to a country that currently has a dictatorship? But at the rate we’re going — especially with his constant attacks on the “the press” and corporate media destroying what little remains of our First Amendment rights — installing a dictatorship in the US shouldn’t take long. Chau.—el barrio rosa

The 14 Defining Characteristics Of Fascism

Powerful and continuing nationalism
Disdain for human rights
Identification of enemies as a unifying cause
Supremacy of the military
Rampant sexism/Anti-Queer agenda
Controlled mass media
Obsession with national security
Religion and government intertwined
Corporate power protected
Labor power suppressed
Disdain for intellectuals & the arts
Obsession with crime & punishment
Rampany cronyism & corruption
Fradulent elections

[Note: In the comments, please do not use The Orange Man’s real name. If you do (even by mistake), your comment will go into the spam filter where I will edit it out, and then post your comment. From hereon, I don’t want that man’s child’s name polluting mi diario/my diary: pink barrio. I don’t want his real name on my site. Muchas Gracias a todos.]


The US is not “America”