Washington National Cathedral: Preaching peace while promoting war criminals

Has Washington National Cathedral completely lost it? Who is running this place? The Dean? The Bishop (for the Diocese of the District of Columbia)? Or both?

Washington National Cathedral (WNC), located in my former home City, the District of Columbia, is a cathedral church of the worldwide Anglican Communion.

Hola a todos. I gave up on Washington National Cathedral (WNC) sometime ago for various reasons (see links below at bottom of article). Both musically, which was the primary reason I was watching their Liturgies, as well as liturgically as they became more Low Church. I had sensed that the now-former Cathedral Organist, Benjamin Straley, had tried to use what influence he had to make the Liturgy more High Church (that was just a guess on my part), but those changes didn’t last. They were only temporary. Things gradually went back to the Low Church way they were.

I saw the image (to your right) online the other day. Why would WNC, a Christian Cathedral Church of the Anglican Communion, promote in its advertisement a neocon Republican politician whose policies in office were as anti-Christian as humanly possible? But I suppose that’s what we should expect today, no? Some of the partisan cultists would ask me, “Would you prefer to see Obama in that ad?” Well no, he’s just as bad. I would prefer to see neither. What does a corrupt politician have to do with WNC? In fact, overall Obama’s even worse because he greatly expanded on the neocon agenda of the illegitimate Bush regime, which you might remember got into office following the 2000 Judicial Coup where the US Supreme Court’s Bush Family friends selected Bush/Cheney to occupy the White House after the stolen election in Florida.

Then there’s that tag line about: “Where the story of faith meets the story of America.” Whatever that’s supposed to mean. Are they talking about how the British came in to — what’s now known as — the US and stole the land from the native peoples who were here to begin with? Is that the “story of America” they’re referring to? What I hear in that tag line is the wrapping of church and state. I would like to point out to WNC that we are supposed to have a separation of church and state here in the United States of America, including at WNC. But I’m well aware that if there’s any place where the lines are blurred and where they love to combine church and state it’s in Washington National Cathedral.

WNC is really no different than the combination of church and state that one sees in the CoE (Church of England) for state ceremonies such as in St Paul’s Anglican Cathedral or Westminster Abbey in London. The difference there is that the CoE/Anglican Church is the Established Church of England. The Archbishop of Canterbury is the liturgical head, although the monarch (Queen Elizabeth II) is the supreme governor. The Church of England is also the mother church of the international Anglican Communion. We don’t have an established church here in the shithole US.

Also, why on Earth would they at WNC promote someone — George W Bush — who constantly violated the fifth of the Ten Commandments (“Thou Shalt Not Kill”)? What part of that commandment do these fake-Christians not understand? Or is that commandment to only be selectively honoured?

Apparently, they don’t believe much of what they preach at WNC or what they claim to believe in. They’re very selective and pick and choose what they believe. Their hypocrisy is noted. They can’t possibly sincerely and genuinely believe what they preach since as of this writing they’re promoting George W Bush in their advertisement. Incredible. I find that reprehensible and repugnant. I’m not part of this new revisionist history crowd when it comes to Bush. I clearly remember his 8 years in office and his years should not be sanitised or sweetened as some are trying to do, no matter how often he and Michelle Obama hug and kiss. The Bush’s and Obama’s are all just one big happy family despite any appearance of “opposition party” pabulum for theatre purposes.

Why would WNC promote a war criminal from the Bush regime? Do they at WNC not remember what the illegitimate Bush regime did during the 8 years? Do they not remember that thousands of innocent people were killed on his watch — with the complicity and enabling of the Republican and “Democratic” Party Cults — based on banks of lies? Do they not remember the Bush regime’s two terrorist attacks (let’s call them what they were dammit), one on Afghanistan (2001) and the other on Iraq (2003)? The innocent people of both countries were terrorised by an attack on their country by the barbaric US Military Industrial Complex Killing Machine. Do they at WNC not remember the neocon’s Project For The New American Century Agenda’s convenient “Inside Job” called 911 — as written about on page 51 of the PNAC document which speaks of needing a new Pearl Harbour to galvanise the public for war, and that “new Pearl Harbour” took place on September 11, 2001 close to 8 months after the illegitimate Bush regime had taken office — and which has served as the excuse for damn-near every draconian repressive measure/law put in place since to keep the public in constant fear of their own shadow in the name of “Terror, Terror, Terror” all the time? Nearly any act of violence today is marketed to the public as “terror.” Before this marketing technique became “the norm” for the neocon agenda, any acts of violence were merely seen for what it was: An act of violence, and not to be exploited for an agenda of perpetual war and bombings as part of US Empire building and world domination. Humans have been violent since the beginning of time. But these basura felt they needed to exploit certain acts of violence for their neocon agenda, so they gave it a specific marketing name: “TerrorTM,” and it’s been used ever since.

What is wrong with these people at WNC? Do they have no memory, no historical recollection of any of this? Or is it more important to them to go out of their way to rub shoulders with corrupt war hawk bourgeois Establishment celebrities — no matter how heinous they are — whenever they attend Liturgies and/or memorial services in the cathedral? This is more of that revisionist history we’re seeing more and more of. Rather than what he is (a neocon Republican), I think George W Bush is now seen as a “liberal.” Ludicrous. I think he’s falsely seen as a “liberal” because he and Michelle Obama have become an item of sorts. Yes, that’s true. George and Michelle are so close and snugly as you can see in those images. It warms one’s heart, doesn’t it? (Gag.) To be clear: The Obamas are no liberals despite that “D” next to their name; his policies overall were to the right of Bush. But there’s still this myth that exists that “Democrat” = liberal. Rubbish. Here’s some chisme/gossip for you: Did you know that George supposedly slipped some candy to Michelle at the memorial service in WNC for John McCain? Oh yes, they enjoyed some candy during the Liturgy where war hawk and warmonger John McCain was canonised and granted sainthood status. I’m surprised they didn’t chant the Litany of Saints during the Liturgy and include Saint McCain’s name.

If I had to take a guess, I suspect most of the people at WNC are Obamabots, devout-faithful partisan “Democrats” and part of the “Democratic” Party Cult. For the canonisation of McCain, war criminal messiah Obama was there too glorifying and speaking the praises of Saint McCain. And I suspect that much of the cathedral staff was absolutely giddy that they were in the presence of the corrupt US Oligarchy’s war criminal celebrities and corporate parasite celebrities from the various branches of the utterly corrupt US government.

One wonders: Is WNC trying to change their “liberal” image to cater to the conservatives/right-wing? One does get that impression despite the sweet words that one supposedly still hears during the Liturgies about “peace, love and brotherhood and fellowship.” Their hypocrisy is glaring.

You might remember the image of torture that we saw during the illegitimate Bush regime years.

Image result for bush years, torture, head on box

Let’s also not forget that Iraq had nothing to do with 911, yet many people were tortured to death (see image on the right) and remain in prison to this day. Yet not one corporate parasite from the neocon illegitimate Bush regime went to jail or was even questioned. I remember that the delusional and constantly wishful-thinking “Democratic” Party Cultists wanted to believe that their messiah Obama was going to “go after Bush” after Obama took office. In reality, just the opposite happened as I and some others had said would be the case. Instead, many from the Bush regime got promotions in other jobs, some stayed over in the Obama regime, and “Mr Hope” and “Change We Can Believe In” Nobel Peace Prize Obama — who left office with 8-9 wars in progress — decided to “look forward and not backwards.” He had no intention of “going after” his friend Bush, but instead greatly expanded many of the illegitimate Bush’s regime’s despicable neocon policies. These are just the facts, which make some partisans very uncomfortable.

Washington National Cathedral routinely preaches “peace and love through Christ Jesus,” while on other occasions celebrating war criminals and the barbaric killing machine known as the US Military Industrial Complex. One wonders how they at WNC live with their hypocrisy? Or do they choose to live in Denial as so many fake-Christians do? Chau.—el barrio rosa

Related:

Is it an Anglican cathedral or a Jazz Night Club?

Southern Baptist Revival Music at Washington National Cathedral ?

Washington National Cathedral: Trying to appeal to US Pop Culture ?

A Tacky Big Band Widor Toccata at Washington National Cathedral

“So Pelosi has a plan, huh?”

Hola a todos. Reading between the lines, USians will allow what’s going to happen to the US to happen, in part, because they will remain rutted in their stagnant “Democratic” and Republican brainwashed cults, which are like religions to them. Yet some damn fools say in political website comment sections that it’s good that Nancy Pelosi (of the US House of Representatives) is waiting on impeachment until the “Democrats” control the House and Senate. That’s not at all what she’s doing. What drugs are these gullible and naïve wishful-thinking fools on? I’ve been hearing that same tripe for the last 18 years. Since 2000. The “Democrats” could have every seat in the House and Senate and impeachment would not happen. Period. They would continue to enable the current White House resident (the Orange Bully) as they’ve already been doing. Should they gain any seats in the 2018 midterm — which they don’t at all deserve to be rewarded with because of their prior pathetic performance — then you’ll hear them say: “It’s too close to the end of his term for impeachment. Let the voters ‘impeach him’ when he’s up for “re-election.” The useless “Democrats” always have some fucking lame excuse. Then he’ll get back in through the same rigged, corrupt, sham of a voting system that put him in in the first place, and the “Democrats” will proceed to give him pretty much anything he wants, just as they did for illegitimate George W Bush. But some brainwashed partisans love to live in their wishful-thinking, delusional denial. There’s no way to fix that, just as there’s no way to fix stupid (which often includes the same idiots I should add). “Democrat” Pelosi is just as much an enabler as any Republican, with both political cults working for their corporate owners, the Military Industrial Complex, et al. Chau.—el barrio rosa

Aretha Franklin’s death and the hypocrisy of celebrity politicians

Hola a todos. With the death of Aretha Franklin and the celebrations of her life come the hypocrisy from corrupt celebrity politicians. Aretha was a very talented artist. She was of the Arts Community and I suspect she strongly supported funding for music and The Arts, which likely served as a catalyst for her to get where she got musically in life. It did for me. Exposure to time-honoured classical music and The Arts at an early age can indeed unveil and reveal hidden talents in young people. And having talent is one of the most critical aspects of being an outstanding and gifted musician.

Mi amigo/My friend said he always thought of Aretha as a disco artist, rather than “the Queen of Soul” as she’s being called. Well, she wasn’t one of the major disco artists like Donna Summer, for example. Some of Donna’s albums were played in their entirety nonstop (I’m thinking of “Love to Love you Baby” and “The MacArthur’s Park Suite,” as two examples) — rather than just one or two tracks from it — on the Technics turntables in the Lost & Found discothèque in SW DC where mis amigos/my friends and I enjoyed years of Friday and Saturday nights dancing on the packed dance floor. Also, the discothèques sometimes played a special extended version of someone’s hit single available to them only. Fortunately, I was able to get some of those extended versions which were better and more elaborate than the commercially-available versions played by radio stations, because Gary’s Records near Connecticut Avenue and K Streets NW in the District of Columbia where I lived had them or could special order them very quickly (“We’ll have it in at 4.00pm today for you” his mother who worked with him would say). Aretha released a disco dance music album in 1979 which, according to Billboard, was “a flop,” selling less than 100,000 copies here in the shithole US. Billboard also described 1979 as “the twilight of the disco era.” The twilight? I don’t think so. I think the twilight came a little bit later. It wasn’t the twilight of disco music in the District. Things were still hopping in DC with new music. Then when I moved to San Francisco in August 1979, they were pretty much playing the same music here at the gay bars as they were playing in the District’s gay bars. Aretha got involved in house music which came after disco. You can read about that here: Aretha Franklin’s Impact on Dance Music Over The Years.

Well, following Aretha’s death, the tributes for Aretha started pouring in:

Mr Nobel Peace Prize messiah Obama who is obviously quite stuck on himself and his celebrity status (can he look any more arrogant?, and is anyone else tired of his left-to-right, right-to-left robotic head movements whenever he’s talking to a group of people?), and who left office with 8-9 wars in progress (I’m sorry I lost count; it was hard to keep up with his wars) despite the hypocrisy of that Nobel Peace Prize he had to use Aretha’s death to get attention for himself — one wonders what political office he is planning to run for at some point? — with a tribute to Aretha. But it occurred to me that when he was in office messiah Obama cut funding for The Arts. Did Aretha know that about “Mr Hope and Change We Can Believe In?” (What a bunch of marketing bull shit that was!) The guy she endorsed for president? For example:

Information on Obama’s budget:

Good for DC museums, not for NEA and arts grants

Obama reduces Arts funding

Then, the thin-skinned, literally-insane Orange Alien and international bully had to stick his narcissistic nose in it. Did he even know who Aretha Franklin was? Had he ever heard of her? Or did that b/witch Sarah Huck have to tell him who she was? Mi amigo told me that the Orange Alien later came out and said that Aretha had worked for him on one occasion. Is that another lie? As is typical with him, he had to exploit Christianity once again for his stupid-is-in evangelical base by pretending to be a Christian. Mind you, the “church” he attends each Domingo/Sunday is his course golf. Of course the man-child Orange Alien is a Christian fraud, like many other fake-Christians including “Democratic” and Republican politicians who are Christian in name-only. They break/violate the Fifth of the The Ten Commandments — “Thou Shalt Not Kill” — with their imperialistic Military Industrial Complex war agenda. The Orange Alien is the exact opposite of Jesus from what we’ve been told about the teachings of Jesus. The Orange Alien called Aretha “a great woman” (I think the words “great” and “so sad” are the only words he knows to describe things) and mentioned her gift from God [sic]. Since when does this basura ever have any interest in god, other than to exploit “him” (god) for his far-right agenda? He’s very selective about when he mentions the Floating Cloud BeingTM to play to his stupid, gullible, brainwashed evangelical base.

For your search engine: Tr*mp federal budget 2018: Massive cuts to the arts, science and the poor

Then attention-craving Hillary popped up, as one might expect:

It seems that Hillary feels she must keep herself in the spotlight — might that be for her upcoming 2020 presidential run to re-run/re-hash 2016 all over again? (not that anything would be different the second time around) — by commenting on Aretha’s death. I won’t bother writing what she said.

But as the following site says about Hillary:

QUOTE: I spent more than a month conducting research, including reading the campaign websites of Clinton, Johnson, Stein and Tr*mp — and doing research on each of them. I did not find a single word in the campaign websites of Clinton, Johnson and Tr*mp about their vision of the The Arts (funding, education, use in diplomacy, First Amendment issues and more). In Jill Stein’s platform it says, under the section on education, “Restore arts, music and recreation to school curriculums.

Ms. Clinton’s site addresses some 38 issues and, as of Aug. 31, includes by my count 164 “fact sheets” on her positions. I read all of this as thoroughly as one could and did not find a single mention of The Arts. In 2013, just as she ended her tenure as Secretary of State, Clinton wrote a short article in Vanity Fair praising the State Department’s Art in Embassies program as a tool of diplomacy. Art, she said, “reaches beyond governments, past the conference rooms and presidential palaces, to help us connect with more people in more places. It is a universal language in our search for common ground, an expression of our shared humanity. END QUOTE [Source.]

Too bad Hillary didn’t insist she and the interviewer talk about funding for music and The Arts in this and any other interviews, rather than what she did talk about: Death and killing with her repugnant, “We came, we saw, he died” line:

La mujer/The woman is quite a piece of work. I thought all these people pretended to be Christians, no? Genuine/Real Christians believe in and honour the Fifth Commandment which again is, “Thou Shalt Not Kill.” What part of that commandment do these war criminal corrupt corporate parasite basura fake-Christians not understand? And I’m speaking of war criminals Hillary, Obama and the Orange Alien. They’re all Christian frauds. Fake Christians, including that far-right, lobotomised-looking Pen*e guy who looks like he’s not all there. Nobody home. Wrapping oneself in the bible with a US flag ribbon doesn’t make one a Christian. They’ve all violated that Fifth Commandment and pretty much anything else that’s in that bible that they pretend to believe in. They only drag it out when it’s politically expedient and to their advantage to do so to sway their stupid cultists, and there’s clearly no shortage of them. Just look around.

I can’t stand hypocrites, and some of them were popping up to give themselves attention and using the opportunity of Aretha Franklin’s death to do so. Although I suspect most partisan-brainwashed “Democratic” Party Cultists said: “I think it’s wonderful that our messiahs Obama and Hillary wrote a tribute to Aretha. They’re such nice people and good ‘Democrats.’” Oh give it a rest, you gullible “Democratic” Party Cultist fools.

Yes, that’s what the easily-deceived and gullible “Democratic” Party Cultists would say. These corrupt politicians — both D and R — wrote a tribute for a reason: To give themselves attention. They’re opportunists. They’re narcissistic of various degrees. That’s what they are. They could have written a very moving and personal private tribute to Aretha’s family including their memories of when they had the pleasure of meeting her and hearing her music performed live in their presence, but no, that wouldn’t give them the attention they crave, would it? Of course not.

I really liked the sassy clothes chosen for Aretha’s lying in state in Detroit. You can see her in the link below. She was wearing a red dress and red dancing shoes with her legs cross in the casket. You go girl! You go Ms Thang! I had thought they were her burial clothes. Apparently, her clothes were later changed for her funeral to match her gold casket. Her funeral was a celebrity event with the attendance of corrupt politicians including Bill and Hillary Clinton. Sorry to see that.

This is for Aretha, should she read this from wherever she is: I suspect that at your funeral some of the “Christians” made the statement that you’ve gone to heaven to be with god. That’s intended to be comforting to the grieving person, that’s why they say that. It sounds nice and pretty and all, but in reality it’s impossible. Because it contradicts the Christian beliefs about Judgment Day. It’s one of the many holes in the Christian belief system. Judgement Day has to come first and we haven’t had that yet. That’s the big day that trumpets will sound (remember all that?) and the verdict on where people will go (Heaven or Hell) will be announced. Well, it will take months for god to get through the names of all the people who have died and where they will go, so you’ll have to be patient. In your case Aretha, after Judgment Day when you get to Hell/Hades where all the good people will be (including the fine jazz and soul musicians) — I mean you certainly don’t want to go to Heaven and be among all those stuffy prudes and be swimming in a river of milk and honey; what a gooey mess that would be! — lay some of your music on them in Hell/Hades. You’ll most assuredly liven up the place. They’ll love ya! Oh and by the way, the late Robert Shaw (formerly of the Atlanta Symphony Orchestra and Chorus on Earth) will likely be there too and he can conduct your Orchestra for you if you’d like if you’ve not made previous arrangements with someone else. The late Margaret Hillis (Founder and Director of the Chicago Symphony Chorus on Earth) can help prepare your backup singers/choral forces for you. Robert Shaw could do that too, but Ms Hillis could probably use the work. Or will she be busy preparing the Hades Symphony Orchestra Chorus for performances? Nevertheless, you will sound wonderful, Aretha! Everyone will enjoy you.

I’ve deliberately not said a word about another memorial/funeral taking place at the same time as Aretha’s. Music is the international language so it’s completely understandable why some international news sources have given her death so much coverage. But I fail to understand the international eulogising, the revisionist history and sainthood status having been bestowed on some guy from the US senate who recently died, who most people (even many/most USians) had probably never even heard of until now. I mean, how many MPs in the British Parliament (or anywhere else in any other world governments) when they die receive international attention, constant accolades and genuflecting based in ugly revisionist history and canonising? I think his butting heads with the Orange Alien — who was told not to come to his memorial — generated part of this interest in this instance. Yet some international news channels gave this guy wall-to-wall coverage. Loco./Crazy. Then at his by-invitation-only memorial service in Washington National Cathedral (a cathedral church of the worldwide Anglican Communion) in the District of Columbia, where the corrupt US Oligarchy was seated for this memorial liturgy, illegitimate George W Bush and messiah Obama stood up there and claimed that this guy had “made me a better president.” Some people just say anything, don’t they? But the word they both left out was “made me a better WAR president.” And the word “president” only applies to perhaps Obama and certainly not to resident Bush when he was illegitimately occupying la casa blanca/the white house, because he (Obama) was supposedly “elected” on the same corrupt sham of a system with easily-hackable electronic voting machines and tabulators that got illegitimate George W Bush in office along with the Judicial Coup of course (where the US Supreme Court’s Bush family friends selected Bush), and before that with extensive help from the Bush Crime Family, such as his brother being governor of Florida at the time where the s-election was stolen with the complicity of Katharine Harris. Remember that piece of work? It’s as if the US Oligarchy wanted Obama in office knowing full-well — and despite his meaningless words during the campaign of “Hope” and “Change We Can Believe In” drivel for the sheeple — that he (Obama) would continue and expand on the neocon right-wing agenda of the illegitimate Bush/Cheney regime just as he did. Did anyone else notice how snugly and cozy as if best of friends George Bush and Michelle Obama were, as usual and here. I also saw this: “George W. Bush Slipped a Piece of Candy to Michelle Obama at McCain’s Funeral.” Isn’t that wonderful. I can’t tell you how much that warms my heart. (roll eyes) In reality, these people are just one big happy family despite the theatrics of partisan divisions and so-called “opposition party” bull shit. All of that stuff is just pabulum and bait for their D and R partisan-brainwashed gullible “Democratic” and Republican Party Cultists. Chau.—el barrio rosa

Related:

Aretha Franklin ‘honoured like a Queen’ as she lies in state
Dressed all in red – with matching lipstick and nail varnish – the Queen of Soul lies in repose inside a gold-plated coffin. [Source.]

Breeder Brainwashing

Because of Breeder Brainwashing, the majority of Queers are still in the closet worldwide with gay guys married to females in hetero relationships with children. Mi amigo/My friend and I see these closet cases every day and they are in the majority.

Hola. Mi amigo/My friend was part of the Breeder World before he came out of the closet. He told me that in the Breeder World and as part of Breeder Brainwashing it’s called “Securing or Cementing the Relationship.” (I call it a damn lot of work.) Here’s an example of what he’s talking about. Mi amigo and I have had the misfortune of walking behind him-tall and dominant/her-short and submissive Millennial breeder couples on numerous occasions. Looking at them, one gets the impression that feminism is long dead. They have to stop every few feet to make-out on the sidewalk. Then they walk a few more feet and stop and make-out. They don’t care whose way they’re standing in either and they seem oblivious to anyone else living here. Then they start the (what I call) “Skip To My Lou” routine which involves hand-holding and arm-swinging as they skip down the sidewalk. It’s the stuff you saw or did in elementary school. When they get to where they’re going (usually Walgr**n’s), she needs another reassurance kiss that he hasn’t fallen out of love with her within the past 2 city blocks when they last made-out. He gets this look on his face as he’s looking down at her as to say: “Well nothing’s changed in the past 2 blocks, I still love you, but I’ll go ahead and give you yet another reassurance kiss before we go in this store since you apparently need that reassurance once again, and I assume you’ll need multiple reassurance kisses when we come out. (The Unspoken: Why are you so damn needy and insecure? Maybe I should have chosen another female, or are you all like this?) Mi amigo tells me that from the days where he was in the closet, this was/is part of Breeder Brainwashing. I wouldn’t have it! I wouldn’t have the patience for this nonsense; this emotional head-trip she’s on. So insecure and needy. Queers don’t do all this nonsense. Queers don’t have to keep “Securing or Cementing the Relationship.” As I’ve said before, I think most Queers are more secure and stable in their relationships than these unstable breeders where she requires endless flowers, attention, money, attention, gifts, attention, more money, attention, candy, attention, more money, attention and the constant reassurance from him that they’re still in love. They are, but only by a thread as far as he’s concerned because he’s getting fed up with this nonsense too. That pussy is not worth all this. That’s what my straight neighbour tells me. So now, it makes sense why the breeder divorce rate in the US is over 50% in the first year. What is it with breeders that they are so terribly insecure with their relationships where needy-her and her head trips needs constant assurance through various means that he still loves her? (Related: Holding Her Hand, GF Away).

Breeder Brainwashing: “Being straight is the only real way.”

That’s the thinking that most guys worldwide are brainwashed with at a fairly early age, and because of that, the majority of the so-called “gay community” (whatever that is here in 2018) is still ashamed of being gay. That explains why I see many Queer guys holding hands with females these days. It’s a bit much I have to say, especially in a former Gay Mecca. Not what one would expect to see here. It’s as if most people want to forget their proudly-radical Queer history of the former Gay Mecca (The Castro Village in San Francisco). Or were most Millennials completely ignorant of the cultural history of San Francisco before moving here in recent years? San Francisco was all over the (inter)national news for decades, how could Millennials have missed that?

With breeder couples, the needy and insecure females demand that their hand be held at all times in public as their guy’s entrance rights into that pussy. In other words, he won’t “get any” if he doesn’t hold her hand in public so that everyone knows that Ms Insecure is taken by the guy holding her hand per her requirement, and not necessarily because he’s really interested in holding her hand. It can get rather tiring after awhile, as well as sweaty. But Breeder Brainwashing mandates “him and her” hand-holding, whether they want to hold hands or not. You do it anyway per the requirements of Breeder Brainwashing. Period.

I say to myself when I see this spectacle: It’s another Queer guy in a breeder/straight relationship. The newest loco/crazy, sad fad? It’s especially the case with Millennial guys. They in particular seem to have been especially brainwashed with the thinking that it’s very bad to be gay. Now keep in mind that Millennials were born and grew up during the former Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement. Which begs the question: Why did Millennials stay in or go back in the closet during the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement? May I assume that their parents opposed the GL Rights Movement? Or did these Millennials pick up this “it’s bad to be gay” thinking from their amigos?

All the Closet Case Millennials on YT:

Almost every day, mi amigo/my friend watches videos on YT where his gaydar tells him (and me as well, since he shows the guy to me) that the guy in the video — who is usually a Millennial (or older) — is gay. Later in the video, the guy feels the need to introduce the viewers to his wife. What mi amigo and I see in the video is a closet case with a female/wife. Yet another one. Mi amigo says: It’s pathetic how many Queer guys are in the closet today. It is as if we’ve truly gone backwards. I agree. It disgusts me really. We’re seeing more and more of this. It’s now an everyday occurrence.

The “Queer/Gay Community” is Dead:

By the looks of things, the so-called “Queer Community” (whatever that is now) has made tremendous progress. Of course I’m being sarcastic because at this point in time it doesn’t really feel like much progress was made at all, considering said progress is currently gradually being chipped away. In reality, it’s been a few steps forward over decades. Then many steps back. That pretty much describes the so-called “gay community” today, which is essentially dead now, in case no one has noticed. Fin. The End. Hang it up. It’s all over. Well, at least I got to live through that time which I’m grateful for. But it’s nothing like those days today.

The general attitude of the so-called “Queer Community” now seems to be:

“Been there, done that” followed by a big yawn. Along with (in the stupid-is-in US): “I’m like whatever like” with phone permanently in face day and night for the next dopamine hit.

Then came “Gay Assimilation”

That was a big mistake. That was the beginning of the end. Was heteronormative conformity with the breeders/straights the ultimate goal of gay “assimilation?”

The accomplishment of legalising gay marriage in Los Estados Unidos/the US was very poorly handled. It was essentially the death of the so-called “gay community” and the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement, because of in part, short-sighted Queer/GTQBL corporatists having sold-out to corporate interests.

One of the topics of our meeting when our little group of local San Francisco Queers got together recently was:

Why did the so-called “gay community” abandon cruising and why did they sanitise themselves of symbols to indicate to other Queers/LGBT GTQBLs that they’re Queer? I’d like to know the answer to that myself.

As some in our group pointed out, during the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement and the height of gay meccas in major cities (such as San Francisco’s Castro), it was commonplace to see Queer guys cruising each other on the sidewalks. Back then, Queers weren’t afraid to cruise each other on the streets. It was part of the proudly-radical Sexual Freedom and Revolution. Today, it much more resembles the opposite of that.

Yeah well. That was then. Today? Cruising is nonexistent. Oh you might see it on the rarest occasion. Mi amigo/my friend was briefly cruised in The Castro recently when I was walking with him. It shocked him so because as he said at the time, “I haven’t been cruised in The Castro in years; that just doesn’t happen anymore. The attitude today seems to be: Don’t look at me. How dare you assume I’m gay. I’m discreet and down low/closeted. I’m too good to be looked at. I’m a depressed, snarly-faced Millennial in the closet. Can’t you tell by the way I’m dressed in conservative all-black clothing?”

That’s about the extent of it today here in 2018. Many people have a depressed, snotty look on their face while holding a phone in front of it. And unfortunately, gay cruising has been replaced with the ubiquitous phone-dopamine addiction which has turned people into absolute zombies. One’s phones — and some people have multiple phones taped together back-to-back (one phone is not enough for for the addicts?) — are the only thing Queers are cruising today as they scroll endlessly and often mindlessly on automatic pilot through millions of sex profiles filled with lies and fake or outdated photos.

What happened to the Rainbow Flag pins?

They went back in the closet with the guy that wore them following the “Declaration for Gay Assimilation.” During the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement, Queers had Rainbow Flag pins of various varieties on their backpacks, shoulder bags or somewhere on their person. Not today. It’s most rare to see anything like that today as it seems that the heteronormative so-called “gay community” finds Rainbow Flags “too gay” or even passé. Even the heteronormative supposedly gay obnoxious jock bro bar — or is that a breeder bar now? — near San Francisco’s Castro does not fly Rainbow Flags. They prefer to fly the flags of corporate sports teams, where one can hear “faggot” jokes made in the locker rooms?

What happened to the coloured handkerchiefs?

“Back in the day” some Queers used the handkerchief code system where gay guys would put a coloured handkerchief in their left back pocket of their jeans to indicate that they’re a top, or their right back pocket of their jeans to show that they’re a bottom. This signaled to other Queers what the guy was into sexually. That left no guessing about that. Along with gaydar, it made things so much easier. Back then, one not only got to see the actual person immediately but one got to talk with the guy right then and there rather than today’s time-consuming, waste of time game-playing, and endless scrolling run-around found on online Queer sex sites where much of the time either the guy is a “no show” when it comes time to finally hook up. One often reads, “I’d like to do this (hook up) within 3 e-mails or less.” You might could do it much faster if you got off your phone.

Was it better then?

Everyone in our group agreed that era was much better than the phone-zombie era we’re in today where lies, more lies and fake photos are ubiquitous. Some guys don’t even know what colour hair they have. Their ad reads: blond/blue. Their profile pic shows a guy with black hair. Then there’s the Internet’s dick measurement system which is an entirely different system than the standard measurement system. For example, on the Internet, 6″ becomes 10″+. One wonders where they start measuring from.

So what happened to cause things to go backwards? To worsen?

Answer: The “Declaration for Gay Assimilation.”

When was this “Declaration for Gay Assimilation” issued?

It was issued the day that gay marriage/same-gender marriage became legal in the shithole US. That was the day the “Declaration for Gay Assimilation” was issued by these busy-bodied, self-appointed omnipotent authority elitist Queer corporatist organisations at the state and federal levels. You know who they are. I won’t mention any of them. I consider most of them basura.

Even though I personally don’t favour marriage or wedLOCK — and there’s a reason it’s called “wedLOCK” — of any kind, of course Queers/GTQBLs should have the right to marry the person they love and want to be with.

I remember that day well. When gay marriage became legal, there was no need for these busy-bodied idiots at these Queer organisations to lecture us Queers as if we were children on what we must do now. But that’s exactly how we were treated. As if we were children, even down to the childish music played for the event. I couldn’t take it. I had to leave. It was too syrupy and childish for mi amigo and me. I remember standing briefly at Castro and Market Streets in San Francisco and hearing some syrupy woman from Equality California ramble on about “We must now assimilate.” I was thinking: Speak for yourself. Don’t speak for me or “we.”

Queers Assimilating with the Breeders?

I’ll speak for myself here: I had no interest in “assimilating” with the breeders. I was “assimilated” with the breeders as much as I cared to be, thank you very much. Why would I want to “assimilate”/blend in and become like the breeders? I don’t hold breeders up as any utopian model for living in society, as dysfunctional as they are, and especially with their over 50% divorce rate in the first year of marriage in the shithole US. Why would Queers want to model their lives after the fucking breeders? Who made the breeders god or the utopian model in the minds of these fucked-up Queer organisations? Go fuck yourself.

That’s why some of us say this accomplishment of gay marriage was extremely poorly handled by these Queer organisations. They were very short-sighted and misguided. They couldn’t just leave gay marriage as something accomplished. No, they had to proceed to lecture us children on what “we must do now” (oh fuck off!) and should do as a result, which was all bull shit. In reality, there was nothing to do other than get married to one’s partner if one wanted to. But this is why some of us feel that gay marriage has backfired in a major way. These corporatist organisations couldn’t just leave well enough alone. The accomplishment of gay marriage was effectively the end of the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement. Who knew that getting married to one’s partner was the ultimate and final goal for Queers, despite all the problems still remaining for Queers? Related: What was the ultimate goal of the Gay Rights Movement?

Gay “Assimilation” = Back in the Closet

And in case one hasn’t noticed (how could you not, assuming one has peered up from one’s phone?), as expected “assimilation” has led to a more sanitised, repressive, regressive and closeted time with behaviour reminiscent of the 1950s.

The 21st Century = The Century of Insanity

Because of Breeder Brainwashing, some gay guys have married women and are continuing to do so. This partly explains why I see gay guys walking around with females as if they are a Breeder couple. It’s part of going back in the closet and pretending to be a breeders. Insanity. It’s also part of Gay “Assimilation” where gay guys have gone back in the closet to fit in with the Breeders and pretending to be straight. The thing is gay marriage was accomplished. That’s a good thing for those who want to get married and have the same legal rights as the Breeders. The insane part is that after gay marriage was accomplished, many gay guys decided to marry women because of societal Breeder Brainwashing. That’s the insanity part. Because if gay guys, in the end, were going to marry females after gay marriage became legal, why the fuck did they work decades for gay marriage? Utter insanity. Related: More back to the 1950s: Gay guys marrying females in droves. Sad.

Queers adopting the worst traits of the Breeders in order to “assimilate”:

Weren’t we Queers already “blended in” with the breeders as much as we cared to be without adopting some of their worst traits, characteristics and interests of them, such as: “Rah, rah, US militarism,” nationalism, becoming more conservative, and worshiping corporate sports team and acting like an obnoxious breeder jock bro?

After the lecture was given about “assimilating”/fitting in with the breeders, some Queers unfortunately lost themselves and got especially brainwashed with US nationalism and militarism during the Obama regime. That was because Obama has a “D” next to his name for “Democrat” so therefore most Queers fell for anything he did because of their “Democratic” Party Cult partisan brainwashing which overrides any logic, reason or hypocrisy. Obama was immediately their new-found messiah because he said the words gay and transgender on the odd occasion (to exploit wealthy Queers for campaign money and their lockstep support), and they took his bait. They had conveniently forgotten that their god Obama had originally said that, “Marriage is between a man and a woman.” Remember that? Obama claimed to have “evolved.” Uh huh. Translation of “Evolved”: He changed his public view on marriage realising that if he did, he could get lots of campaign dinero/money from Hollywood elites and, again, from some gullible Queers who fell for his latest stunt.

Anti-War Queers under Bush. Pro-War Queers under Obama.

Even though Queers were anti-war during the illegitimate Bush regime years, they flipped and supported war with their silence, complicity and lack of protesting during the Obama regime years. Why? Because suddenly war was good because it was a so-called “Democrat” (their messiah Obama) leading them. Queer Hypocrites! Some Queers flipped-out entirely and adamantly wanted to be openly part of the imperialistic US Military Industrial Complex (MIC) so that they could go kill other Queers (and breeders as well) around el mundo/the world. Queers did realise they would be killing other Queers around the world “in the line of duty,” correct (whether in or out of the closet in the MIC)? Or did this never occur to them?

This was the exact opposite of the pro-peace position of Queers during the original Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement. During the Obama regime years, Queers enjoyed singing about war and US imperialism (they enjoyed singing the tacky US national anthem), and I think they still do, having “assimilated,” of course. (roll eyes). There are also Queers today who support the anti-gay and insane orange nazi man-child and the trash in his regime. They are nothing like the Queers I’ve ever known who adamantly rejected war and imperialism, and homophobic politicians! But this has all been part of Queers “assimilating” with the breeders. It all sounds so positive, doesn’t it? [sarcasm intended] And consequently, the so-called “gay community” has become very conservative.

Again, those self-appointed, know-it-all authorities at the US national Queer organisations who take it upon themselves to make decisions for the so-called “gay community” and who gave the order for “gay assimilation,” apparently live with delusions of grandeur that we now live in a utopian society. Because the problem with Queers “blending in” with the breeders is the following:

Since the breeders (bigoted/homophobic and there are many of those) are in the majority and Queers are in the minority, Queers end up going back in the closet in order to “blend in with the breeders.” One sees this in the body language and facial/eye movement behaviour of Queers today reminiscent of closeted Queers of the 1950s, from what I know about that era. Queers pretend to be straight to “fit in” with the breeders. With gay “assimilation,” “Out and Proud” went back in the closet and or is relegated to one day a year, if that, typically called “Pride” Sunday/Weekend for those into that thoroughly corporate event.

One thing is clear: Our self-appointed omnipotent Queer decisions makers have shown themselves to be fucking idiots and extremely short-sighted. Because any damn fool should have seen this coming. Because if you say that you’re Queer/Gay in a sea of (anti-gay) breeders you stick out, and again, there’s no shortage of homophobic breeders out there, especially among the increasingly visible white supremacists of today. Some breeders say they support gay rights. Then out of the other side of their mouth they say they don’t like seeing gay people/Queers showing affection in public. I don’t give a damn what they like seeing. I’ve had it up to here with seeing breeder make-out scenes in San Francisco’s Castro and elsewhere. It seems that it’s alright for them to make out in public, but not for Queers. Related: US public: Gay legal rights = good, gays kissing = bad.

Back in the Closet

Today, Queers label themselves “discreet” and “down low/DL.” Translation: In the closet. Some Queers unfortunately say, “I identify as gay” (rather than just saying, “I’m gay”) which implies their sexuality is a choice and their sexual orientation can be changed.” The far-right will love to hear that since they have said for decades that being gay is a choice. Consequently, the “Out and Proud” behaviour and the slogan of decades past has disappeared. And also consequently, the majority of the “discreet” and “down low” so-called “gay community” has become ashamed of being gay — at least that’s the way it appears to our local group — as Queers try to “blend in” with the breeders.

As part of back in the closet, Queers have sanitised themselves

Accordingly, we’re sorry to see that Queers have sanitised themselves and their outward appearances to give no indication to breeders or even other Queers that they might be Queer/Gay. They look no differently than the breeders. Queers got rid of their rad hair styles — their hawks and faux hawks — because breeders generally don’t have hawks. They wear a baseball cap.

Baseball cap and beard = Mr Breeder Jock

It’s easy to be a jock today. No working out at a gym is required. All a guy has to do is put on a baseball cap and grow a beard. You’re instantly a jock bro.

Queers take on the personae of their bullies

It’s ironic that many Queers decided to take on the appearance and (obnoxious) personae of breeder jocks, because historically it was the obnoxious anti-gay jocks that bullied gay guys on sports fields, especially the gay guys who weren’t good at sports. And this still happens to this day. Why would gay guys want to be like their bullies? Cole Valley in San Francisco is saturated with this type of jock bro. They look like they all came out of the same factory mold. To look like Mr Breeder Jock, many Queers started wearing baseball caps and grew a beard. And mi amigo and I see what looks like closeted gay guys walking hand-in-hand with females over there, as well as in The Castro.

Breeder Brainwashing = “Him and her”

With breeder brainwashing comes the never-ending parade of “Him and Her” and their required public make-out scenes and mandatory hand-holding. When I see couples jogging, it’s always “him and her” wearing conservative all-black, which makes them extremely easy to see at night since they don’t have the intelligence to wear any reflecting clothing. The insecure female seems to require constant 24-hour attention and devotion from her guy — it’s a full-time job for him; I wouldn’t have the patience for it frankly — presumably to assure Ms Insecure that he’s still interested in her. Wouldn’t it be easier for her to get some credible psychotherapy? Then she wouldn’t need his constant reassurance, hopefully. Part of his behaviour of course is specifically intended for entrance rights to that pussy.

And again, breeder brainwashing is worldwide. I saw two migrants facing each other waiting to get into Equador from Venezuela, and what did the camera show us? The breeders kissing each other on the lips. Yes, more breeder brainwashing. Of course they didn’t show any guys or lesbians kissing. Not likely to see that. Then on a network from Paris, they engaged in Breeder Brainwashing by showing viewers various breeder couples. One was a “him and her” Asian couple about to get married. She was wearing the perfunctory white wedding dress even though we all know she’s likely been fucked many times by various guys including the dude she’s about to marry which makes that “I’m a virgin” white wedding dress a joke, irrelevant, as well as hypocritical. Then they showed us a Black breeder couple. He had to spin her around as if she were a specimen he needed to examine (similar to what they do on the Latino networks), specifically to check out her butt to make sure it was satisfactory. Why didn’t she spin him around to make sure his butt was sufficient? The Breeder Sexism and accompanying Breeder Male Chauvinism way of thinking is noted. (Related: 12 Ways in Which Women Perpetuate Male Chauvinism). Viewers saw this couple in various staged breeder poses, kisses, embraces, frail-her being submissive to macho-him (Feminism is dead with them obviously), dainty-her sitting on his macho knee, then the two having coffee and a close-up of them kissing on the lips. (With coffee breath? Ugh.) This segment or programme was entirely Breeder Brainwashing for the viewers. So some networks go out of their way to continuously Breeder Brainwash their viewers with the message that “You must be straight.” Of course they would never show us any Queer couples engaged in similar behaviour, especially two Queer boys. No, you’re not about to see that unless some Queer channel produces it and nobody would pick that up. That would be limited to viewing in perhaps what gay bars remain, or some other limited venue.

Was heteronormative conformity the goal of “Gay Assimilation?”

It would absolutely seem so says our group of local Queers. So reviewing, with gay “assimilation,” any and all symbols of being Queer went back in the closet along with the Queer person, because:

1. Breeders don’t officially have Rainbow Flags (although some of us sense that breeders have tried to hijack the Rainbow Flag by passionately making out under them as they have been seen to do under the big Rainbow Flag at Harvey Milk Plaza in San Francisco.)

2. Breeders don’t have coloured handkerchiefs to wear in their back pockets.

3. Breeders don’t cruise on the street. They’re usually glued to their phone just like today’s Queers; their phone is the only thing they’re cruising. I often think about the Queer phone zombie I see: The guy that they’re so desperately looking for on that phone just walked by them on the street but neither of them saw each other because they were both glued to that screen in their hand. A missed opportunity.

Other ways that Queers have sanitised themselves to make themselves look like/”fit in” with the breeders:

There was a time near the end of the Old City of San Francisco — meaning before tech came in and ruined The City along with the greed-based Real Estate Industrial Complex — when The Castro was still a gay mecca, where bling earrings were new and “in.” Almost every guy I saw was wearing bling earrings/diamond studs of one type or another, some small, some large in their ears. The Castro was saturated with bling earrings. I liked them and I still wear mine. I’m not sure when the bling earrings went back in the closet but they pretty much all disappeared at the same time. It’s rare to see any today. I’m guessing they disappeared when the “Declaration for Gay Assimilation” was given because breeder guys don’t usually wear earrings, or at least white breeder guys don’t. So, in order to be like the breeder jock bros, gay guys took out their earrings. (roll eyes).

Everything went back in the closet to be like the Breeders

It all went back in the closet: Their earrings, their personal Rainbow Flags and any other Queer symbols that one was gay went back in the closet along with the guy himself in many cases, as if once again one was ashamed of one’s gay sexual orientation. Sigh. I do see some Black and Latino guys on occasion who still wear bling, although not in The Castro usually.

It’s amazing what (insecure) Queers do to be like the precious breeders? By sanitising themselves of those things I listed above to “fit in” with the breeders.

The Queers that one sees showing up for Gay Freedom Day (also known as Corporate Pride, Inc) are just a small percentage of the worldwide so-called “gay community.” Because most Queers are in the closet worldwide. Are most of those who show up for Gay Freedom Day only “Out and Proud” that one day of the year because it’s considered “okay to be out and gay” on that particular day?

Today, a large segment — perhaps most — of Queers are in breeder relationships worldwide. They’re married to females and pumping out babies to follow The Breeder Family ScriptTM so as not to disappoint their anti-gay parents and families. Apparently these Queers think that their parents’ lives and feelings are more important than their own life, their Queer feelings, their being honest with themselves and others about their true gay sexual orientation. Otherwise, they wouldn’t cater to their (bigoted?) parents/family’s anti-gay feelings by being a closet case. Because by being in the closet, one is constantly living a lie about one’s Queer sexual orientation. Queers (I’m specifically talking about gay guys here) go against their own gay sexual orientation that they were born with, they override that — by trying to suppress or repress or by breeder-brainwashing themselves — and get themselves tangled up in a relationship with a female. And because they shouldn’t be with a female to begin with because they’re gay, some of these gay guys go from one failed breeder marriage to another. Their relationships with females don’t work. But they keep trying, and keep living a lie. I know of one well-known conductor like that. His initials are SR. I’ve always thought he was gay but he continues to this day trying to be straight — or to give that false impression — due to societal breeder brainwashing that “guys are supposed to be with girls.”

Romanticising and Eroticising Pussy

Some sex sites with an anti-gay agenda heavily romanticise and eroticise pussy to try to breeder-brainwash gay guys into “converting” to straight (or bi) using the “sexuality is fluid” myth which caters to the far-right’s agenda that “gay people choose to be gay.” The gay guys I’ve talked with who started out with pussy while living in the closet have told me: Pussy is no big deal. It’s just another hole, and a rather smelly one at that. It’s nothing special. If she’s clean it, it can be “satisfying” is what one gay guy told me who slept with women decades ago. Another gay guy who had sex with females before he came out of the closet told me, “It’s impossible to get rid of that fishy stink no matter how she cleans it. It’s part of what that female anatomy is.” My straight neighbour said the same. As he said: In sex videos, you often see the guy focus only on her clit while finger-fucking her, but he doesn’t put his mouth or nose anywhere near the smelly entrance to her pussy which can be 1/4″ or less from her anus. If she hasn’t cleaned well, it can be a real turn-off.

Mi amigo told me that before he came out of the closet and would go on camping trips or river rafting trips with about 10-15 different breeders (males and females) at a time: “When we would raft down the river, we always made sure that the females were off to the side because some of them would be on their period and the blood thing in the water was a bit gross for us guys, especially when we stopped and the females would stand up. The age group was teens and 20s. We used to tease the females about it, they knew why we were doing it. We guys all got the pussy smell. When the females stood up, you never wanted to look down because it would be a bit on the gross side especially if some of the females were on their period. We were all thought to be straight guys and we would say: Just admit it, the whole fucking thing, that pussy, is a mess. Speaking of breeder brainwashing, how did one get brainwashed into liking all that?

“Gay Conversion” = Breeder Brainwashing

There are some people in the “gay conversion” crowd who enjoy revealing their ignorance by saying that the reason more gay guys are allegedly “getting into pussy” and “converting” to bi or straight is because of “increasing acceptance of gay people.” WTF? That doesn’t make any sense. Increasing acceptance of gay people? Where is this happening? Related:

Anti-gay hate on the rise
US boy, 9, killed himself after homophobic bullying, mum says
Paris: Five charged with murdering transgender sex worker who was reportedly trying to stop a robbery. Trans people are targeted for violence all over the world, with 16 having been murdered in the US in 2018 alone. [Source]

And this also explains why most of the so-called “gay community” (what little remains of it) in San Francisco has seemingly gone back in the closet from all indications that our little group of local Queers sees here in San Francisco. Because these days, I can’t easily tell a breeder guy from a Queer guy anymore and my gaydar is pretty good. I’d like to point out that if there were “increasing acceptance of gay people” as some in the “gay conversion” crowd say, then gay people wouldn’t be trying to go straight. They would enjoy their alleged “increasing acceptance” and remain gay and true to their sexual orientation they were born with.

It’s not just gay guys, but lesbians too

It’s not just gay guys who have gone to great lengths to give themselves an Assimilation MakeoverTM to look like straight guys and macho jock bros. A complaint I’ve read online a few times during my research from some lesbians is that lesbians today have sanitised themselves too by trying to look like feminine straight/breeder women. When I’m out and about in San Francisco, that does seem to be the case. I don’t often see females where I can definitely tell that she’s a lesbian. During the now-dead Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement, I had no difficulty spotting a lesbian. From what I’ve read online, some lesbians are going to straight bars to pick up other lesbians. WTF? Well that indeed makes sense in these insane times. Then they get pissed when a straight guy hits on them in a straight bar. Loca. The last remaining lesbian bar in San Francisco closed sometime ago.

Are things better today here in 2018?

The way our little group of San Francisco Queers sees it: Some things are better today than they were back then, such as we do have the Internet today, as one example. But everyone in our group much preferred the very personal and community-way that Queers interacted with each other in person in the past era of the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement, as opposed to the cold, impersonal, unfriendly and almost “fuck you” rude way we see today from most phone-zombie online “connections.” The Tech Industrial Complex has turned San Francisco into a very cold and impersonal City with many longtime locals saying “This new City sucks. The City has lost its soul.”

Still stuck in the heteronormative past wherever you look

Many things today remain stuck in the traditional heteronormative distant past where everyone is assumed to be straight, until proven otherwise. Even openly gay guys are required to dance with females on corporate network television programmes. The viewing audience must be constantly breeder brainwashed with scenes of “him and her” to give the (false) impression to the audience that everyone here is straight and so-called “normal.” This is always the case in Olympic competitions and Ballroom dancing on television. It was consistently the case when I was watching the very heternormative Classic Arts Showcase network, allegedly run by two (closeted?) Queer guys. One always sees the breeder brainwashing of “him and her,” even when it’s blatant that he is gay (and a closet case?) and she may be a lesbian.

Breeders don’t have any acronyms. Why do Queers need one? I thought they wanted to be like the Breeders, so what’s with the silly acronyms?

Recently, the Gay Games 2018 were held in Paris. I saw lesbians being choreographed to pose with gay guys. Was someone trying to give the impression that they were breeder couples? And even though they called it the Gay Games, they apparently couldn’t leave it at that and exclusively say/use the word “gay.” They often also used the corporate-conformist and Queer revisionist history “LGBT” acronym. For those who don’t know, lesbians did not lead the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement as “LGBT” implies — gay guys and trans individuals led the movement and did most of the work — so lesbians do not belong in or deserve first place in that acronym. But at least they didn’t call it the “LGBT Games.” As I’ve pointed out before, notice that the Q is missing. What do they have against Queers? Related: Lea DeLaria: The LGBTQIA+ acronym is divisive and The official acronym is now: LGBTQQICAPF2K+.

For the Gay Games in Paris, of the athletes I saw, they were not trying to act like hard-assed jock bros as one would likely see here in the shithole US. Instead, of the athletes I saw, they reminded me of the gay guys of the genuine gay community of the Old City San Francisco. It was good to see Queers being themselves and not trying to emulate obnoxious breeder jock bros. Maybe that’s mostly an obnoxious US thing.

Mi amigo/my friend saw a sad example of Breeder Brainwashing at his gym as I was completing this article. He told me about it:

I’ve seen this guy for years. Over the years I was at the “gay gym” in The Castro working out he was there, and now he’s at my current gym. It’s obvious to me that he’s gay. He’s never looked at me or said hello. Yesterday at the gym he was working out right next to me which was odd since there was hardly anyone there and we had the whole place to ourselves. He was stuck on his phone and we were so close that I could see what was on his screen. He was reading this syrupy e-mail from his wife telling him how great their marriage is and how happy they are together and how happy they are to have a child. A picture of the child was on the screen. (I said to mi amigo: She put all that in an e-mail? She sounds rather insecure to me. She’s trying to convince him that they’re happy together is what this sounds like to me.) Mi amigo continued on: I looked at this guy’s face while he was reading this syrupy e-mail and he almost looked disgusted as if his wife’s e-mail was a turn-on, too much. Too drippy. He wasn’t smiling at all. He just clicked it off. He looked almost annoyed and completely uninterested in this e-mail from his wife. I suspect he was about to go home to her and she would be all over him still trying to convince him how happy they are together being married and with a child, which would turn him off even more especially after getting that e-mail reassuring him how wonderful things are between them, as far as she’s concerned. (I said: Was it her bright idea for them to have a baby to “make us so much happier” the excuse often given? As I’ve said before: Don’t bet on it. Don’t use/exploit a baby for your happiness. If you’re unhappy now, get some credible therapy because you’ll be even more unhappy and even resentful after dealing with all the extra responsibilities of a baby. His wife, Ms Insecure, is either clueless, in denial, or realises he’s losing interest in her if he had any sincere interest in her to begin with, and that’s why she sent the e-mail. To reassure him how happy they are as far as she is concerned. They’re not happy as far as he is concerned by the way you say he looked while reading the e-mail because he’s not into her. He was talked into her or a female in general as part of Breeder Brainwashing. And there are thousands of gay guys in relationships with females just like him.) Mi amigo said: What I saw was a Queer boy who was essentially feeling very sad that he didn’t have a boyfriend or male partner to go home to and living with him. The guy I saw didn’t look happy at all which is so often the case with closet cases, guys who are gay but who have been Breeder Brainwashed. (Gracias for that, mi amigo.)

Then, as I was completing this article, I watched an organist I’m familiar with play a French organ work. The first time I saw this guy my gaydar told me: He’s a Queer boy. And at the time he had an Asian Queer boy page turner who was very effeminate. I thought that perhaps his page turner was his partner. Well, recently and a couple of years later, I watched this organist again. I looked at this Queer boy’s left hand while he was playing and he now has a gold wedding ring on his left hand fourth finger. That’s where the breeders wear their wedding rings. (Sigh) His page turner was now an older female. What happened to the Asian Queer boy page turner? I said to myself: I see yet another closet case now married to a female, presumably. From what I’ve observed, it’s standard for Queers to wear their wedding rings on their right hand fourth finger to signify they’re Queer and are married to their partner. In European orchestras, for example, the Queers (gays and lesbians) wear their wedding rings on their right hand fourth finger. I’ve noticed that consistently in the EU, whereas the breeders wear their wedding rings on the left hand fourth finger. So what I saw recently with this Queer boy organist here in the US was yet another closet case having presumably married a female within the last 2 years as he — with his gay shame — pretends to be straight/a breeder, having been Breeder Brainwashed just like millions of other Queers worldwide. I felt disgusted. In the past, I’ve enjoyed his playing. But after seeing that, I haven’t gone back to watch him play as I would usually do. I’m not saying I won’t, it’s just that now I’m not that eager because he’s turned me off like all the other closet cases I see.

And as I completed this article, I watched a segment on street dancing in Paris led by a dance instructor. Lots of people there. All the couples were Breeder Brainwashed him and her, except for one female couple I saw. I guess a lesbian couple or two females were allowed to dance together because lesbians are considered “more acceptable to prejudiced and bigoted people” than gay guys are. (You might remember that StarB*c*s had the hands of a lesbian couple on their holiday cups. That was the “safe” choice in the mind of the anti-gay Marketing Department. Don’t expect to see two guys holding hands on their cups.) At this dance event in Paris, I saw no gay guys dancing together at all, although I saw many guys who looked gay to me but they were dancing with females of course. Pretending to be straight? And again, this was in Paris, France. Sigh.

Ah yes, we’ve made such great progress, such great strides, haven’t we?! As Queers head back into the closet with their Breeder Brainwashing. As I’ve said before, someone will have to start the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement all over again at some point at the rate things are going because Breeder Brainwashed Queers have forgotten that the price of freedom is eternal vigilance. Fin./The End. Chau.—el barrio rosa

Related:

More back to the 1950s: Gay guys marrying females in droves. Sad.

Whoever thought that being Queer was just a fad ?

Change it back to Gay Freedom Day

Are there no openly gay people in San Francisco anymore?

Obama and the Transgender Activist

Gay Shame: A Sign of the Times

“Gay people can live anywhere”—Brand LGBT(TM)

Gay Rights’ Movement Legacy Hijacked By Lesbians. May GLBTQ Live On!

A video from France Vingt-quatre (pronounced: vehn katr):

Sacrosanct Mother Russia and the SEP Cult

Hola. Someone e-mailed me asking why I think the Socialist Equality(?) Party (SEP) is so staunchly pro-Russia that they continue to deny the increasing evidence of Russia’s influence, interference and collusion in the US 2016 presidential s-election. And no, I did not support war criminal Hillary Clinton, so let’s get that out of the way (nor did I support war criminal Obama).

So I began to think about this. Why would the SEP Cult — where they and their cultist supporters behave no differently than the blinders-on “Democratic” Party Cult and the Republican Cult — remain so unconditional in their support of what they appear to see as Sacrosanct Mother Russia?

The history of the SEP is not something I’ve given much if any thought to, to tell you the truth. You’ll find these topics on their site, among others related:

1917 – 2017: Russian Revolution Centenary

Socialism and the centenary of the Russian Revolution

Lenin, Trotsky and the Marxism of the October Revolution

From my understanding of these one-track-mind class-obsessed people at the SEP, their belief system comes out of Russia with Leon Trotsky. The Chairman of the US SEP Cult is a devout Trotskyist.

“Trotskyism is the theory of Marxism as advocated by Leon Trotsky. Trotsky identified himself as an orthodox Marxist and Bolshevik–Leninist and supported founding a vanguard party of the proletariat, proletarian internationalism and a dictatorship of the proletariat based on working class self-emancipation and mass democracy. Trotskyists are critical of Stalinism as they oppose Joseph Stalin’s theory of socialism in one country in favor of Trotsky’s theory of permanent revolution. Trotskyists also criticize the bureaucracy that developed in the Soviet Union under Stalin.” [Source]

This is all beginning to make sense now. When one’s cult-party’s belief system and origin comes from their lord and saviour, the Almighty Leon Trotsky (a Russian) and out of Mother Russia — which the SEP see as sacrosanct by all indications — it’s as if the SEP Cult signed an agreement with the Trotsky Estate and or the Kremlin to never, ever be critical of Sacrosanct Mother Russia because of their god Leon Trotsky and other Russian connections to the origin of their SEP Cult.

I now completely understand where this “Rah, Rah, Russia” SEP Cult is coming from and their absolute worship, adoration and glorification of Sacrosanct Mother Russia. Regardless of evidence to the contrary, through their perpetual denial, it now makes sense that they will forever adamantly reject Mother Russia’s collusion in the US 2016 presidential s-election or anything else negative about Sacrosanct Mother Russia. They might as well call themselves the (Russian) Orthodox Church of the SEP. At this point in our Liturgy, let’s stand and chant the Nicene Creed: “We believe in one SEP Cult …. ”

For a Trotskyist Cult-Party that describes itself as “Left Wing” (I presume they’re being sarcastic), they hold a very extreme, simplistic and simple-minded point of view that all the problems in our society are because of one’s social class, which is ludicrous thinking. Many problems have nothing to do with one’s social class at all. The example I usually give of that is that I have known people in all social classes who are anti-Queer/anti-gay. Anti-Queer feelings/homophobia are not based on class. All hate is brainwashed into people regardless of their social class or “social-standing.” But this is not something that the SEP Cult will admit. Their “mind” is closed to this. I know from experience. When I tried to explain this to them years ago, I got nowhere with the SEP Cultists. I was trolled and subjected to the old, tired “Attack the Messenger” routine. I was met with a wall of resistance and their usual tripe, “Identity politics are a distraction from the class struggle.” I find it pretty damned offensive to dismiss an entire group of people (Queers) who continue to be discriminated against as “identity politics,” simply because it doesn’t affect the elitist Trotskyist SEP Cultist, who are mostly breeders? I suspect if they were all Queer they wouldn’t hold such an offensive, flippant, dismissive attitude toward Queers/GTQBLs.

Their extremely simplistic way of thinking — that it’s all about class — I suppose is great for people who like simple slogans for simple minds and who are straight, white (or white Latino), mostly male and sexist, including sexist females. I mean, when literally everything is class-based, what else is there to think about? With the SEP, one has the Ruling Class, the Ruling Elite Class, the Working Class1 and other class language. Meanwhile, the rest of us try to live in the real world which is filled with a multitude of many topics that are related and inter-related, and where life is not all about class and one’s social standing. The way they at the SEP Cult go about avoiding any topic that’s not their precious one-track-mind topic of “social class struggle” is to deem it “identity politics” which means it’s outright dismissed, not worthy of discussion and considered to be “a distraction” from their constant “class” theme.

These people are a piece of work.

And don’t dare think of bringing up the topic of Queer persecution in Mother Russia because you’ll be slapped down/reprimanded. The Cultists will come at you with, “We at the SEP oppose any discussion about identity politics! Class is all we care about. Any discussion about identity politics is a distraction from the class topic.” Yes, their one-track “mind” can only handle one topic: Class. Their thinking smacks of absolute straight white male privilege with some homophobia mixed in which they try to conceal. All of this the female Cultists consistently go along with as well. Everyone is in fascistic SEP Cult lockstep. I think the SEP Cult is mostly dominated by (older) straight white males. That too explains a lot. Might there be some closet cases as well? Since to my knowledge no one on that site has ever admitted that they’re Queer, especially among the Cultists. The impression I’ve always come away with is that they’re straight, white, mostly male and come with that special privilege.

The so-called “Left Wing” Trotskyist SEP Cult is obsessed with “The Ruling Class” and “the working class struggle” as they call it.

For some time, I had erroneously thought that socialists were rather “rad” (meaning radical, and I’m using that in a positive way) and on the left. Perhaps some are, but that’s not the case with this cult. I’ve never known genuine Left Wing people like these people. Ever. Which is why I had concluded sometime ago that they were/are conservatives overall, regardless of what they call themselves. People call themselves anything these days. It doesn’t have to have any basis in reality.

The Trotskyist SEP Cult say that “the Ruling Class” is terrified of an impending revolution by “the working class.” Really? There’s an “impending revolution” by “the working class?” Where’s this happening? What drugs are these people on who dream up this delusional caca? They come off as wishful-thinking and delusional as the “Democratic” Party Cultists. An “impending revolution?” Nonsense. Even the employees of corporate Amaz*n who are exploited and treated like basura show no sign of “rising up” — because they know they would be fired and quickly replaced with new employees because employees are seen as commodities by most corporations — with an “impending revolution.” The only “impending revolution” by “the working class” or anybody else would be if everyone’s phone went dark all at the same time worldwide because The Cloud collapsed. (I’d like to see that happen. What would millions of dopamine-addicted phone-zombies do then? Their entire life which is all on that phone would disappear because their phone went dead.)

The SEP say they oppose The Billionaire Class, but not when it’s the Sacrosanct and Billionaire-Owned Sexist and Male-Dominated Tech Industrial Complex, which they promote on their site with tech icons. Interesting that the sexist and male-dominated(?) SEP promote a sexist and male-dominated industry, isn’t it? I guess that’s what one should expect. These SEP hypocrites write articles about FB censorship, while they promote FB on their site (particularly over there on the right side in the “social media” box). I’m sure I’m not the only person to notice their glaring hypocrisy. When they’ve been called on it, the SEP Cultists claim that they have to use “social media” because “it’s so engrained in our society just like one’s electricity company.” (roll eyes). One needs electricity to survive. One does not need to vegetate on billionaire-owned fucking FB or Twi**er to survive. The only reason these SEP Cultist idiots refuse to get off of billionaire-owned “social media” is because that would require them having to change their own behaviour — which they’re not about to do — and their addiction to “social media.” It would require them to disturb their own comfort level, which they’re not about to do. It would require them to stand for something such as principles such as their genuinely opposing the billionaire class and I mean all of it, not just selectively based on their comfort level and the things they want to use because they have a dopamine-addiction to them. These SEP Cultists are such fucking hypocrites.

The Trotskyist Socialist Equality Party? They don’t believe in equality, so why have the word Equality as part of their name?

Maybe they should remove the word Equality from their Cult’s name. I have to say it’s ironic no, hypocritical that a Cult-party that pretends to be “Left Wing” and uses the word “Equality” as part of their name is so rampant with inequality in their thinking, such as their dismissive attitude of Queers as “identity politics.” Or their dismissive attitude of feminism and women’s issues as “gender politics” and “a distraction from the working class struggle.”

I didn’t know that in order to be a so-called “socialist” — or at least a so-called “socialist” of their septic variety — that one is required to be sexist, misogynistic and chauvinistic. When I was on their site on a regular basis this Cult that uses the word “Equality” as part of their name refused to even acknowledge that racism exists in our society. They were reprimanded on this a few times by some commenters, although by none of the regular Cultists commenters as I recall. Instead, according to the SEP Cult, racism was all about class and not about the colour of someone’s skin-pigmentation. So if a Black person were discriminated against, it was because the person was poor and of the “lower class.” Not because the person was Black. Ludicrous.

Maybe it’s just me, but when I see a person, I do not think, “What class is this person from?” I just see another human being. I never think about what class anyone is from. I mean, who does that? Well, I would assume the SEP Cultists do that since they’re absolutely fixated with class. I can’t imagine what their day must be like having to “scan” everyone they see and immediately run them through the “what class is this person from?” mental process. That would be mentally exhausting. But since the time that came up on their site — the thing about racism doesn’t exist — I think the racist and sexist male fossils that run this so-called “inEquality” Cult (they remind me of the fossils who run the LDS Church) had to be brought into the 21st Century in order for their god writers to appear to have any credibility at all and acknowledge that racism even exists to some degree. I think that’s how they put it now. That racism exists to some degree.

And hasn’t every article they’ve written at this “(in)Equality” Cult about the #metoo movement been dismissive of the women who have come forth? I think so, with their Cultists — including the anti-feminists, pro-sexist females — all commenting and genuflecting to their sexist male god writer with gushing praise for his rank brainwashed sexism.

Is this what one would expect from a genuine Left Wing site? No. It’s what I’ve come to expect from a conservative, right-wing site, regardless of how they label themselves.

The Trotskyist SEP Cult is strongly supporting Julian Assange. He’s one of the insane Orange Alien’s supporters. Julian had private communications with the Orange Alien’s 2016 presidential campaign. The SEP Cultists are certainly in good company, while they charade as “Left Wing.” I read that e-mails have been revealed showing Julian Assange to be racist, antisemitic, homophobic, and transphobic. Well, upon reflection, that’s exactly the type of person I would expect this “(in)Equality” Cult to support since all of those negatives would fall under the “identity politics” category, and not worthy of discussion because they are “a distraction from the working class struggle.” Oh give it a rest!

Below, if you can stand to read them, are a few of the comments from the Cultists on their most recent article about the #metoo movement:

One of the Cultists (a guy, I think) wrote this in the comments:

“We have to be careful not to offend working class women in critiquing feminism and even #metoo (though we must defend due process and related rights). At first I was a big opponent of both, and in my own mind, still am, but now I think one must be incredibly careful not to offend working class women. Right wing Feminism is more popular than socialism. There’s no reason to fight it head on. It is a peripheral, religious expression of capitalist politics. And it is true that men and women have divisions, discrimination and distrust which however can only be addressed by socialism. It took me much thought on the issue to get here. The same can be said, I might add, as a strategy with other identity politics.”

One of the male Cultists wrote:

“Opposing feminism and #metoo does not offend working class women, it offends bourgeois and middle class women.”

As you can see, they are just absolutely obsessed with social class.

A female Cultist wrote this in response which received five thumbs-ups as of this writing:

“It doesn’t matter who it offends. Feminism by its nature is hostile to the class struggle. If some feelings get hurt in promoting that view, recall that the consequences of the working class failing to pursue the class struggle to a conclusion will hurt more than feelings.”

My response to that: It does matter who it offends if you’re trying to attract others to your offensive sexist SEP Cult. Or are you so damn thick that you fail to understand that, Ms Sexist? Feminism by its nature is hostile to the class struggle? How’s that? Where did one get brainwashed with that thinking? Aren’t women about 50% of the “working class?” How does one derive such moronic thinking? jesus, what is wrong with these people? It’s not as if women just sit home and dinero/money, food, housing and other necessities automatically show up in their credit union or corporate bank account. This is what makes the SEP Cult sound so ignorant. Upon reflection, I suspect it was on the SEP Cult site that said brainwashing occurred.

(Sigh. These people! Where on Earth do they live?)

One of the male Cultists wrote this drivel:

“The working class is just as susceptible to bourgeois ideology as anyone else. Working for wages does not automatically defend you from alien class pressures. This is also in response to the other responder here who said that working class women wouldn’t get offended. Such “workerism” claims detract from the need for a serious revolutionary understanding and theoretical development as a real defense against bourgeois ideology. Anyone who is offended by this analysis is falling victim to those aforementioned petty-bourgeois moods, whether they are working class or not.”

Another comment from one of the male Cultists:

“I am still researching that question… maybe working class women are offended…. I have reason to suspect as much. I also have even better reason to suspect that some men dislike feminism and #metoo for the wrong reasons…. I.E. they are engaging in their own kind of gender politics… which is also a negative.”

One of the longtime senior-citizen sexist female Cultists wrote this in response to their latest article about #metoo, thanking their god writer:

“Thank you for clearing the air in regard to these highly shabby and sleazy characters. [Ed. She's referring to the women who have come forward, and as always is in agreement with their sexist messiah god writer.] They stain everything they touch. It’s all so sordid.” This comment received eleven thumbs-ups as of this writing.

As of this writing, they had received only 40-some comments on their most recent #metoo article, and most of those were the Cultists commenting repeatedly back and forth with each other. Looking back, their earlier #metoo articles got lots more comments. I think that their sexist god writer has worked this topic to the max and people have reached a saturation point where there’s nothing more to be said about it that they haven’t already written numerous times in their attempt to discredit the women and support the guys accused of sexual harassment and or sexual assault.

Many of the Cultist commenters have identified themselves as being, “I’m in my 60s” or “I’m in my early 70s.” Yeah, that’s what I had expected. An older generation where all of these topics that they would call “identity politics” were “shoved under the rug” and where racism, homophobia, sexism and other negative “isms” were seen as perfectly acceptable “back in my day.” Perhaps that, in part, does explain their outdated generationally-brainwashed sexist thinking, particularly when it comes to gender equality.

Anytime a commenter’s handle/screen name does not indicate a gender, the SEP Cultists automatically assume the commenter is male — I’ve seen this repeatedly — reinforcing the sexist thinking of this male-dominated “(in)Equality” Cult.

One wonders why the so-called “Left Wing” Trotskyist SEP Cult chose to write article after article about the #metoo movement because that’s “identity politics” or “gender politics,” which they oppose. Aren’t their #metoo articles “a distraction from the class struggle?” Despite their hypocrisy, the reason they did so is because these articles fit perfectly into their sexist, chauvinistic and misogynistic way of thinking, so therefore, they make an exception for this. Just like they make an exception for the sexist and male-dominated billionaire tech industry while saying they oppose the billionaire class out of the other side of their mouth. Hypocrisy is in these days, especially among the Socialist “(in)Equality” Party Cult.

And again, all of this from a site that pretends to be so-called “Left Wing.”

The SEP Cult goes by a whole string of names: The SEP, the ICFI which stands for The International Committee of the Fourth International (Dahling), Leon Trotsky Fourth International, Trotskyist, Marxists, Communists, and some of their Cultists refer to their god writers as “comrade,” which from my research: “Ever since the Russian Revolution, popular media in the Western World have often associated it with Communism.” [Source]

Some of the Cultist commenters constantly gushingly thank their god writers for every article they write by commenting with drivel such as: “Thank you, comrade [name of writer] for this essential socialist perspective of the ‘social class struggle.’” (roll eyes)

Or:

“Thank you [name of writer], for this valuable update on the increasing censorship being carried out by the likes of G**gle, FB and Twi**er. As you say, the international working class – ‘must fight for the expropriation of the social media monopolies under public control as a key component of the fight for socialism’. Given that the originators of G**gle, FB and Twi**er were probably relatively well intended about providing a world wide social service, their ultimate subjugation to a dominant, profit driven state power is an important lesson for the international working class. Part of this lesson is the awareness that the same level of labour, intellect and purpose that invented our social media platforms still exists among the international working class. Moreover, it is this level of relatively independent technical productive force that could/should prove to be critical throughout the ‘fight for socialism’.”

Note to SEP Cultists: It’s the writer’s job to write articles, no? They don’t need to be thanked for each article they pump out. They’re just doing their job. If you have a job, does anyone thank you every single day for doing your job? I suspect not. The occasional thanks is fine, but not every single time you write a comment on their site worshipping the writer.

Their god writers are also seen as sacrosanct and not to be criticised under any circumstance otherwise one will be subjected to the wrath of the extremely thin-skinned devout SEP Cultist commenters. They remind me of the thin-skinned “Democratic” Party Cultists. It’s the same, partisan brainwashed mentality, just with a different party/viewpoint.

The SEP internationally is in 7 countries. Despite that, they seem to have accomplished little to nothing. Most people have never heard of them, I suspect. That’s a good thing from my point of view, as off-putting and abrasive as they are overall. There’s certainly nothing warm, friendly, welcoming or “community-like” about them or their site. Cold-assed best describes them. I think in previous articles I’ve referred to most of them as being abrasive assholes.

There’s also no shortage of ignorance on their site among their Cultist commenters who often present themselves as know-it-alls. They at the SEP are never wrong, are they? One of their willfully-ignorant conformist commenters wrote:

“At a time of rising Human Rights for the LGBTQ, and beyond, community we have the #metoo movement. A movement where people look over their shoulders when dealing with the ‘opposite sex.’”

Ah, but that’s a no-no. Did he forget that what he’s talking about is “identity politics” and you don’t do that on their site without repercussions? No one responded to him and his comment only received one thumbs-up. And I noticed he had to use the conformist and corporatist Queer revisionist history acronym “LGBTQ.” Ugh. But rising human rights for Queers? Where on Earth has this person been not to know that’s not the case overall:

Queer rights are being eroded, see here and here.

Support for Queer/Gay people suffers ‘alarming erosion,’ report finds

The thin-skinned, insane orange nazi’s anti-Queer/GTQBL record

And they would never dream of talking about or writing an article about this, because it’s “identity politics:”

Paris: Five charged with murdering transgender sex worker who was reportedly trying to stop a robbery

Aren’t trans people “the working class?” Trans people are targeted for violence all over the world, with 16 having been murdered in the US in 2018 alone. [Source]

Like with the other cult political parties — I’m thinking of the “Democratic” and Republican Cults specifically — there seems to be some differences of opinion over what they at the Socialist “(in)Equality” Party Cult stand for. For example, one of their writers and politicians is for open borders (which I agree with) but the overwhelming majority of the SEP Cultists seem to oppose open borders. Also, some of their Cultists use the word Communist to describe themselves and others will come along and say “We are not Communists.” Well maybe you’re not, but some of the others are according to them. Some of the Cultists write “we are not on the Left.” Meanwhile some of their god writers write that certain search engines “are censoring Left-Wing sites such as the SEP site.” But there’s one thing they all seem to be in agreement over: Sexism and their support for it with their female Cultists leading the way, along with their hate for what they call “identity politics” and “gender politics.” One female Cultist was mocking the glass ceiling, as if it were to be dismissed as unimportant. These people are quite a piece of work and best to be ignored and avoided.

Speaking of “identity politics,” the Trotskyist Socialist “(in)Equality” Party Cult is supporting Chelsea Manning (related: Chelsea Manning is now hanging with the alt-right). It seems there’s a ban on her speaking in Australia. Chelsea is transgender which they mention nothing about in one of their articles about her presumably so to avoid talking about the Queer so-called “community” and to avoid looking like hypocrites with their rabid anti-”identity politics” agenda. In another article, they wrote that she had planned to talk about her prison time, transgender issues, privacy and W*k*leaks. Hmmmmmmmm. But transgender issues are “identity politics” so why would they even support her going to New Zealand to talk about that? Once again, their hypocrisy is rank. And, why do they support someone (Chelsea) who has been seen associating with the alt-right? What is it with these people? It makes their claim of being “Left Wing” look like a complete fraud.

May I presume that the Trotskyist Socialist “(in)Equality” Party Cult would not want any talk about the violence against Queers (as seen in the video below) because they would scream “Identity Politics!! Identity Politics!!:”

A video from France Vingt-quatre (pronounced: vehn katr):

The Trotskyist Socialist “(in)Equality” Party Cult should instead be focused on the human struggle regardless of class which includes all humans, rather than their misguided and selective class struggle, wherein they dismiss, disregard and disrespect many humans in the name of “identity politics” and “gender politics.” Loco./Crazy. Chau.—el barrio rosa

———————-
1 To my knowledge, they never define who constitutes or who makes up “the working class” that they drone on about, or the income bracket (minimum to maximum) for “the working class.” I’ve never seen that on their site. So really “the working class” is a rather nebulous group.

Related:

The SEP: Always a friend to sexism

The SEP’s Billionaire-Class Hypocrisy and “Social Media”

The SEP: “Populist arguments such as sexual orientation are divisive.”

The Hypocrisy: The SEP’s cheerleading for the Billionaire Tech Industry

Jill Stein Supporters: You’re Wasting Your Time With The Conservative SEP

Sexist and Chauvinistic Marxists (ICFI)

Socialist Equality Party: Blame the Victim

The Elitist Socialist Equality Party

The “i” Word Again On A Socialist Website

International Committee of the Fourth International

Leon Trotsky: See here and here.

Attorney Michael Avenatti for US president in 2020 ?

Hola a todos. I’m a bit jet-lagged at the moment. I just got back from Russia. Yes, had a lovely trip. Although it was most unexpected. El presidente Vladimir Putin invited me to Moscow for “tea and light refreshment.” He said he had read mi diario/my diary, pink barrio, and the many accusations from “Democratic” Party Cultists that I’m a “Russian Operative”. He was wondering if I’d like to become a “Russian Operative.” When I heard that I changed the topic and said, “the tea and light refreshments” are quite good. While sitting there with him he asked me if I’d like to hear some music since he said he had read about my musical background and training. I said: Oh something by Sergei Rachmaninov, of course. Russian you know! He asked, “Anything in particular?” I said: Maybe one of the pieces from his Moments Musicaux, Op. 16, how about #1 in b flat minor? After listening to that, he became more direct on the “Russian Operative” topic. It was at this point that I became rather blunt and told him: Contrary to the lies/trolling that the “Democratic” Party Cultists and others spew, I’m not an “operative” for anyone. They just can’t stand it when anyone tells the truth about their septic cult, so they resort to their usual immature tactic of labeling anyone who disagrees with their cult and their corrupt celebrity politicians as “a Russian Operative.” He said he had expected me to help with the ultimate goal. I asked about that. He said, “But of course it’s to get the insane orange nazi man-child and international bully as you describe him on your site back in office — illegitimately so just like his first term — for another 4 years. And that’s to be followed by 8 years of the Pen*e nazi regime.” He pushed the topic more intensely by saying, “I’m sure I can count on you. Do what you can do on your site, pink barrio, to have that corrupt Cult that you refer to as the “Democratic” Party Cult nominate corrupt war criminal Hillary once again because people detest her.” I said: Yes they do, then they turn around and vote for her while saying they had no one else to vote for. Insane. They had a credible candidate to vote for in Dra Jill Stein. They just didn’t have the intelligence to do so, as usual. Stein was the best candidate who ran and she was/is a genuine progressive, unlike right-wing pro-war Hillary whom the fake-liberals/fake-progressives voted for and still support like good little brainwashed “Democratic” Party Cultists. A genuine progressive would never consider voting for a right-wing candidate because that is a contradiction in terms and in one’s principles/convictions. I assured presidente Putin that I wouldn’t need to do as he was suggesting because it won’t surprise me if the DNC puts Hillary up again as their nominee. Either her, or that Establishment Biden guy who’s just as bad and about as interesting and appealing as an old condom one would see on the sidewalk. There was a brief lull in our conversation. So I took the opportunity to have a few moments for a serious discussion about (violent) Queer/GTQBL persecution in Russia. He denied there was any Queer persecution in Russia. Typical lying politician. I said: It’s undeniable, I’m not here to argue about it and don’t play games with me. He asked, “Is Queer persecution here in Russia the reason you couldn’t be a ‘Russian Operative?’” I said: Well it’s part of it, but I don’t work for any (inter)national government(s) and their agenda. Nearly all, if not all, governments are thoroughly corrupt with the US Oligarchy leading the way in corruption, lying, killing and you-name-it, they do it! He said, “But you’re so opposed to the corrupt, pro-war, imperialistic “Democratic” Party Cult.” I said: That’s correct, but that’s been the case with me as far back as the 2000 stolen election1 and Judicial Coup when they mostly behaved like a door mat for the Republicans, and have done so ever since. These days, the “Democrats” are the Republicans best enablers and employees. So anything I write about them comes naturally for me and not out of some “Russian Operative” agenda.

That was the end of our meeting and my fictional trip to Russia.

Mi amigo/my friend told me that he read that el abogado/Attorney Michael Avenatti says he’s considering running for president of the US in 2020. From my research, he’s a registered Democrat. I don’t know why he’s aligned with that orange nazi-enabling Cult. Maybe he will become an independent (nonpartisan) if he runs.

Since Michael is not part of the Capital Hill “Democratic” Party Cult — also known as the US Oligarchy — should he run in 2020 as a “Democrat,” he would very likely be subjected to the same treatment as was given to fake-independent/fake-progressive and “Democratic” Party enabler Bernie Sanders. He was “thrown under the bus” by the “Democratic” Party Cult. Later, you might remember that he ultimately warmly endorsed war criminal and war hawk corrupt Hillary Clinton in 2016. That’s not something that a genuine progressive would ever consider doing.

Therefore, Michael Avenatti will likely be “kicked to the curb” or “thrown under the bus” by the so-called “leadership” of the “Democratic” Party Cult. He would be subjected to the same treatment as Dennis Kucinich, Maxine Waters and a few others who come to mind. They were essentially told to “sit down and shut up. When we want to hear from you, we (the party “leadership”) will let you know.” Michael would not be one of the Darlings of the “Democratic” Party because he did not come up through the corrupt ranks of the Cult like the Establishment trash did. He also doesn’t put up with any shit, so he might tell the so-called “leadership” of the party where they can shove it. Someone certainly needs to.

Well, the “Democratic” Party brainwashed Cultists (voters) already oppose Michael’s run. They say he doesn’t have any political experience. Translation: He’s not a right-wing corporate parasite like the trash we consistently support. As far as I’m concerned, that’s a good thing. Why does he need political experience? He’s an attorney and good at what he does from what I can tell. As an attorney, he understands how our corrupt cesspool of a system works. I’ve seen him in several corporate media interviews. He tells it like it is.

The “Democratic” Party Cultists point to the orange nazi as “a mistake that the Republicans made by choosing someone without political experience.” That’s absolute caca. In this case, his many problems have nothing to do with his lack of political experience. His many problems have to do with his regressive politics, his insanity, his being so thin-skinned and needing constant adoration, his lack of mental stability, his white supremacy, his constant lying, his corruption, his constant bullying, his pussy-grabbing, his chauvinism, his misogyny, his sexism, his trying to find yet another country to have a dysfunction/conflict with and bully, his complete lack of social/people skills, his narcissism (“it’s all about me”), his elitism and many other damnable, unattractive traits. He’s worse than scum. None of which have to do with a lack of political experience. All of that and more can also be found in a “seasoned” politician. And there are some just like that in congress.

Then there his sidekick, that strange Pen*e guy. What head trips are going on in that man’s head? Have you looked at him? He just stares straight ahead as if he’s undergone a lobotomy. No one home. He’s even worse than the orange nazi — if you can imagine that! — and he has political experience. He’s an attorney, a former governor of Indiana and a former member of the US House of Representatives.

I couldn’t stand Obama, but only a lunatic like the thin-skinned orange nazi would obsess over Obama and anything he did and have an agenda of reversing anything Obama did simply because Obama is Black.

The bottom line: Even though Avenatti is a Democrat, the “Democratic” Party brainwashed Cultists don’t want him to “rock the boat” of their precious Establishment messiah politicians whom they worship, glorify and adore, world without end. Amen. Yes, it is just like a religion for these cultist trash. I guess they would rather have a Biden or that Hillary than Michael Avenatti. Insanity. They really have the lowest of standards and come without any principles or convictions whatsoever. Unless one considers their brainwashed devotion to their Republican-enabling Cult a “conviction.” Avenatti is not The Establishment and that’s what these fake-progressives and fake-liberals (“Democratic” Party Cultists) who hang out on these fake-progressive sites want. They want to remain in the cesspool rut with their stagnant right-wing Establishment career corporate parasites.

Take this comment for instance:

“We can’t vote for people with no political experience. We can’t make the mistake republicans made. He should try, and run for a lower political position first, and see how that goes.”

Where did this person get brainwashed with such ludicrous thinking? The current cesspool called the House and Senate got there by the way this commenter suggested. They “ran for a lower political position first,” and we’ve seen where that septic rot has gotten us, no?

“No political experience” is not one of the requirements for running for office. But one can take that approach if one wants, but don’t pretend to speak for “we,” por favor. Speak for yourself.

Another thing: The trash in congress are called “law makers.” How can a “law maker” make laws without requiring a law degree? Yet many members of the House and Senate have no legal training whatsoever. Did you know that? It’s true. Look it up if you don’t believe me. Many of them have no law degree whatsoever. For example, Dianne Feinstein and Nancy Pelosi have no legal training. They both have a Bachelor of Arts degree in a completely unrelated field to what they’re doing in the Senate (Feinstein) and House (Pelosi). There are many others just like them in the cesspool called the US Congress. I’ve heard Feinstein say in hearings: “I don’t have any legal training, but as best I can understand you…” And I’m thinking to myself: Then what the fuck are you do sitting in the Senate, Feinstein, when you have no legal training and no law degree? Yet you’re allowed to sit there and make laws just because you were able to get enough stupid and gullible people to vote for you repeatedly in California when you ran for the US Senate. Incredible. Something is very wrong with that. And this woman has lived in the District of Columbia as a senator long enough to have earned a JD at either George Washington University School of Law or Georgetown University School of Law. They are two excellent law schools in the District. (When I lived in the District, GWU was right around the corner from my apartment in Foggy Bottom and I had friends who were law students at both GWU and at Georgetown University). The same goes for Pelosi in the House. Neither Feinstein or Pelosi have taken it upon themselves to better themselves as members of the US Congress by going to law school and earning a law degree while living in DC.

In my opinion, that commenter’s blanket approach (“we can’t vote for people with no political experience”) is very short-sighted. This should be decided on a case-by-case basis. If you’ve heard Attorney Michael Avenatti — who earned his JD degree at George Washington University School of Law — speak and know anything about him, one can hardly compare him and his intelligence level to that of the stupid insane and thin-skinned orange nazi. Frankly, I think Avenatti may be a bit over-qualified for the “Democratic” Party Cult since he has an earned law degree (as opposed to some honorary shit), or a Bachelor of Arts degree like Feinstein and Pelosi. There’s nothing wrong with a BA degree, I’m not saying that. But one would think a Doctor of Law degree would be required to be a “law maker” in the US Congress.

A follow-up comment from the same person:

“A lot of people might be turned off by no political experience. That might even be the mantra for the 2020 election, not to vote for inexperience, like the idiot running the country right now. It could happen though, it all depends on how much support that candidate has. I personally hope another “Obama” type, or better surfaces, to run for POTUS in 2020. I can guarantee you one thing. t-Rump will not win the next time around, that’s if he isn’t impeached.”

Sigh. (roll eyes)

And to those who continue to believe through their Denial that our fraudulent voting system in the US is fair, honest and legitimate as well as “secure,” you might want to read this:

An 11-year-old hacked a replica of Florida’s voting system in 10 minutes
A hackathon highlights the real threats malicious hackers pose to our democracy.

The gullible among us will say: Oh that could never happen in our elections. You mean to say so-called “elections.”

Stupid is in. (roll eyes) The US of Denial and Hypocrisy.

Modus Operandi of “Democratic” Party Cultists: Wishful-thinking

I’m not sure what that commenter means by “another ‘Obama’ type” since I personally would not want another Obama — and was glad when he left office — as he greatly expanded the illegitimate Bush/Cheney regime’s agenda, which anyone knows who was paying close attention. Mr Nobel Peace Prize Obama left office with 8-9 wars (I lost count) in progress which the orange nazi has continued after he campaigned against “nation building.” Hypocrite. In reality, Obama was one of the best Republicans the Republicans have had while he charades as a “Democrat” like most of them. This commenter’s “big and tough” talk guarantee is meaningless, but it’s so damn typical of “Democrats.” They can’t guarantee that any more than I can. I suggest that that commenter’s crystal ball made in China is defective or needs new batteries or a re-charge. What s/he is engaging in is more wishful-thinking which again is so typical of “Democrats.” And on the odd occasion that something that their wishful-thinking predicted happens to come true, the end result is not as they had predicted. Obama being a perfect example of that. Mr “Hope” and “Change We Can Believe In” turned out to be worse than illegitimate George W Bush overall. Obama expanded the Bush regime’s agenda instead of “going after Bush” as the wishful-thinking “Democratic” Party Cultists had predicted he would do. He didn’t “go after Bush” at all. Instead, he ramped up the Bush regime’s agenda and said, “We must look forward and not backward” meaning he had no intention of “going after” anyone. That’s also why we see these chummy images of the Bush Crime Family and the Obama’s together. Such as here and here. Check those out. And Obama has called George W Bush, “a good man.” Oh good lawd.

“Democratic” Party Cultists: Your messiah Obama called George W Bush “a good man.” Did you read that? Your saviour Obama describes the basura you protested for 8 years “a good man.” What do you think about that? Do you still “stand by your war criminal” idiots?

“To know the man is to like the man,” Obama has said of Bush. “He knows who he is. He doesn’t put on any pretenses. He takes his job seriously, but he doesn’t take himself too seriously. He is a good man.”

Well frankly, just for starters, I don’t think of someone who steals elections with the help of their governor brother and others and who lies repeatedly about WMDs in Iraq and kills thousands of innocent people with needless wars based on lies as “a good man.” But one should consider the source! This is a case of one war criminal eating the ass of another war criminal. So may I assume that commenter I’m responding to is a “Democrat?” And “Democrats” are frequently wrong with their “big and tough” predictions time after time. And “Democrats” typically use the “t-RUMP” language as seen there.

I fully expect the thin-skinned orange nazi to have a second term, if he doesn’t die in office. His body size is getting bigger and bigger and that big ass of his can barely be covered with his jackets. Notice I didn’t say “re-elected” because I don’t believe he was “elected” the first time. I believe it was an illegitimate so-called “election.” And little will be any different the second time around, especially with the archaic electoral college. And he’s not about to be impeached because “Democrat” Nancy Pelosi will see to that. She keeps enabling him by taking impeachment “off the table” as she’s done at least 3 times now (I’ve lost count on that, I’m sorry). Here’s one of them.

I choose to look at reality rather than engaging in “Democratic” Cultist wishful-thinking. I expect 8 years of the thin-skinned orange nazi unfortunately, followed by 8 years of someone even worse, if that’s possible: that bigoted Pen*e guy.

And one should remember that the senior senator (Dahling) Dianne Feinstein with her Bachelor of Arts degree in History assured us all that “we should expect him to serve his full term.” Does she mean with her help, as the senior senator (Dahling)?

Despite their theatrics to the contrary before corporate network cameras for their very gullible wishful-thinking “Democratic” Party Cultists (supporters), I think the “Democrats” in the House and Senate honestly but covertly like the orange nazi and are really quite comfortable with him in power. Otherwise, as one example, they wouldn’t have granted him more surveillance powers as they have.

Then, on 1 August 2018, 41 senate “Democrats” helped/enabled the Republicans once again by voting (87-10) for the obscene $708 BILLION spending bill for the US Military Industrial Complex. Yes, absolutely, the “Democrats” are among the orange nazi’s best supporters and enablers. No one can tell me they don’t like him (excluding Maxine Waters of course). They occasionally try to put on a good show of so-called “opposition” for their drooling gullible cultists, but it’s all theatre and theatrics.

Regarding Michael Avenatti, I think the only people who would have a problem with a candidate with no political experience are the Establishment brainwashed “Democratic” Party Cultists who worship and glorify the corrupt trash in their party and they wouldn’t dream of having anyone upset their septic status quo. So they want yet another messiah Obama type? Fucking insane. But what else should one expect from brainwashed Dembots? They’re absolutely pathetic. Chau.—el barrio rosa

———————
1 During the Judicial Coup as part of the stolen 2000 so-called “election,” I said at the time: It’s all over for this country, and I meant that. I said: If they’ll do this, they will do anything. And they have. No one wanted to hear what I was saying. They chose Denial and grandiose wishful-thinking, as they still do. I was called every name under the sun for saying that, none of which bothered me. Our little local group of San Francisco Queers said to me at our last get together: “You know, you were right. It was all over for this country back in 2000. Things have only gotten worse since politically speaking.”

Related:

“Democratic” Party Cultists – Part 1

How to respond to “Democratic” Party Cultists

Hola a todos. Our little local group of San Francisco Queers got together this past week, and one of our topics for discussion was the cesspool called US politics. Ugh. The question raised was: How to respond to “Democratic” Party Cultists here in The Cesspool/Los Estados Unidos/the US.

I don’t usually say much at our get-togethers — I take notes because our group has come to expect me to write about our meetings here on pink barrio — because I’m the only one of us with a website. So I think to myself: Everybody probably already knows what I think anyway from their reading my site, so I’ll let others do the talking and I’ll mostly just listen.

Well, that approach didn’t work this time. They specifically asked for my opinion on this topic first thing. Point blank, they asked me: How do you respond (or do you?) to “Democratic” Party Cultists who are only critical of the Republican Party, when often what the Cultists are complaining about with the Republicans can also be said about their own party, but they refuse to do so out of partisan devotion?

I said: Both corporate, pro-war, right-wing parties are like cults, and both have their cultist disciples or blind followers. How do I respond to the “Democratic” Party Cultists? I don’t. It’s a waste of time. It will accomplish nothing and I say that from years of experience having wasted literally hundreds of hours of my time over years responding to those “Democratic” partisan-brainwashed idiots. Nothing you say to them matters. They dismiss it or make excuses for their stagnant celebrity right-wing corporate career politicians. Nothing you say to them will change their mind. So why bother?

My position is: At this point in time here in 2018, “one either gets it or they don’t.” And if they don’t “get it” by now, they’re not about to it seems to me. People are too damn stupid and thick with partisan brainwashing, and it’s the same brainwashing methods used with fundamentalist religious fanatics. The cultists of both right-wing parties have been thoroughly brainwashed with this thinking of “my party right or wrong,” meaning they will defend and stay with their corrupt trashy party no matter what they do, even when they’re wrong, and even when the “Democratic” Party is eating the upper colon of the Republican Party and voting with them.

The cultists don’t care about anything you say in opposition to their partisan brainwashing. They only want criticism of the other right-wing “team”/party (the Republicans). With their profound lack of self-respect, they (the “Democratic” Party Cultists) permanently reside in the cesspool called the “Democratic” Party and defend them no matter what they do. Either that, or they remain silent having been brainwashed that they must never criticise one of their own or their own “team.” And because of their silencio/silence and complicity with their corrupt right-wing party, they serve as enablers to the right-wing “Democratic” Party while charading as “liberals” and “progressives.” In reality, they are fake-liberals and fake-progressives.

Because when one supports a pro-war, imperialistic, corrupt corporate right-wing party one is right-wing whether one acknowledges that or not and regardless of how one labels oneself. Period. A genuine progressive and genuine liberal would never support the right-wing “Democratic” Party or the Republican Party because that would be a glaring contradiction in terms and in one’s principles/convictions. But one should not expect the brainwashed partisans to ever understand this. They love to play The Blame GameTM — rather than blaming themselves for their poor decisions of continually supporting pathetic, corrupt, hawkish corporate candidates — and by accusing anyone who does not support their trashy party of having “ideological purity.” As for what they call “ideological purity,” let me say that at least some people stand for something. At least some people have some principles and convictions, which cannot at all be said about the “Democratic” Party Cultists and their brainwashed party-line devotion.

Partisans (both “Democrats” and Republicans) have been thoroughly brainwashed, and with few exceptions, there’s nothing one can say to them to penetrate that partisan wall. I can vouch for that. That wall is thicker than cement, I know from experience. The experience is no different than talking with a religious fundamentalist fanatic. With brainwashed partisans, it’s all the other “team’s” fault. They once again play the victim, and The Blame GameTM and lay all of their s-election problems on being the fault of third parties. Even though they rattle on about “democracy” from time-to-time, clearly “Democratic” Party Cultists don’t believe in democracy. Their dislike/hate for third parties and anyone who is not in fascist lockstep with their “team” demonstrates that, by their blaming third parties for their losses, instead of laying the blame where it belong: with their corrupt corporate party and its horrible candidates. And they never have the maturity to take any ownership or responsibility for their own party’s failures. With “Democratic” Party Cultists, it’s always the Republicans and others who are to blame in their demented, brainwashed thinking. Frankly, I can’t stand them.

I’ve found that when you bring up the facts about their team, they don’t want to hear it, they completely ignore them, remain silent about them and go back to their usual theme, “…but the Republicans…” Either that, or they accuse one of “attacking” their messiah politicians. For example, when Obama was in office, anytime one stated the facts about Obama that his Cultists didn’t want to hear, they screamed, “Why are you attacking Obama?” I remember asking the fools: How is presenting his record from the senate “attacking Obama?” Of course they never answered that and instead went off on, “But the Republicans…” Sigh.

“Democratic” Party Cultists are so predictable in their response. I remember writing to them: We’re not talking about the Republicans right now. Pay attention. Stay on topic. They’re so childish and so tiresome, and such a waste of time. That’s why I say fuck them. They’re not about to change, so why bother wasting any time on the basura.

And the fake-progressive sites — which are merely front sites for the corrupt “Democratic” Party especially at s-election time — are currently banning anyone who is not in authoritarian lockstep as cheer leaders for the “Democratic” Party. These sites are taking the same measures as some so-called “social media” sites where one is seen as “trying to influence the election.” Billionaire-owned and pretty-named “social media” sites are deleting accounts. On the fake-progressive sites, if you’re not in authoritarian lockstep with the “Democratic” Party Cultists, you’re seen as “trying to influence the s-election (for Russia)” and for the other corrupt pro-war team (the Republicans), whom the “Democrats” often work for, vote with and enable.1

The “Democratic” Party Cultists resort to labeling anyone not in authoritarian lockstep with their brainwashed thinking as “a Russian operative” and then they add, “What are the hotel rates tonight in Moscow (or St Petersburg)?” They think that sounds cute and is such a stab. That’s their latest childish trolling rhetoric as of this writing. Compare that to during the Obama regime years, anyone who disagreed with their messiah Obama, the “Democratic” Party Cultists labeled, “a [Karl] Rove Operative” or “a Republican Operative.”

The Bottom Line: In other words, the average person can’t have an opposing view to theirs. One is always an “operative” to them and someone to blame for their many failures. Because in the insipid mind (the word “mind” used advisedly) of the “Democratic” Cultists, you have to be up to no good as a “Russian Operative” and an orange nazi man-child supporter to speak a word of criticism about their sacrosanct “Democratic” Party. Their authoritarian Cultists — which includes the fake-progressive and fake-liberal sites themselves (of the ones I’m aware of which shall remain nameless) — demand lockstep obedience and “Democratic” partisan devotion. They and their fake-progressive sites are good little fascists.

One of the Queerboys in our group spoke up and said:

“Good little fascists? Exactly, they are good little fascists. I was banned from two sites recently because I wasn’t in fascistic lockstep with the “Democratic” Party Cultists, as you accurately call them. I wasn’t rude or crude to anyone. They banned me because they didn’t like my message which was in response to their lie that “Hillary lost because of Jill Stein and Gary Johnson.” They’ve resurrected that lie material for the 2018 midterms. I commented that Hillary ‘lost’ — even though she won the popular vote which they all seem to forget — because she was a terrible candidate. I wasn’t in agreement with the ‘Democratic’ partisan cultists.”

I asked him: So they used the old “Attack the Messenger” routine on you? He said: Exactly. They attacked me for telling the truth that they didn’t want to hear and then banned me. Yes, that’s very common at this time of year before midterms. Here in the myth called the “Land of the Free” (ha!), according to the “Democratic” Party Cultists one is not to exercise the freedom to vote for the candidate of one’s choice per one’s principles and convictions. One is to be in authoritarian lockstep with the corrupt “Democratic” Party.

So again, my position is: Why bother responding to them? I go so far as to say: Why bother even paying any attention to this political theatre BS or reading their partisan-brainwashed comments? And especially at this time before the 2018 midterms because the content on their sites will be geared to “rallying the troops” — meaning anyone reading their site and any less-than-devout and disillusioned “Democrats” sitting on the fence — to get them in lockstep to support the corporate, imperialistic, pro-war, right-wing parasites who have a D next their name. Fuck them. That’s how I feel about it.

As I’ve written many times before:

The “Democratic” Party could have every seat in the House and Senate and they would still work for the right-wing (Republican) agenda, and the “Democratic” Cultists would dutifully continue to make excuses and apologies for them, proceeded by, “but the Republicans…”

One would hear some of them timidly say:

Quote: Well this is not at all meant as a criticism because I love my party and I love our distinguished politicians [Ed. "Distinguished?" You consider corporate trash "distinguished," do you? You wouldn't if you were not wallowing in the gutter with them as their enabler.] but forgive me for saying this, but I don’t understand why our Democrats are not doing more and standing tall against those nasty, evil Republicans. End Quote.

While others will scream back to that person by saying:

Quote: You must be new to politics. Welcome to our team. Glad to have you aboard as a good and proud Democrat. You have to give them tiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiime. Just be patient. Just give them tiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiime, and welcome aboard. End Quote.

Does one remember all that pabulum we heard during the illegitimate George W Bush years and during the Obama years? For the first 1.5 years of the Obama regime, we heard “Democratic” Party Cultists say, “You have to give him tiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiime. He inherited a mess.” No one but me said: I would like to point out that your messiah Obama asked to “inherit the mess,” correct? Yes. He begged for the job. No one forced the job of president on him. Again, he begged for it, remember? So stop make fucking lame excuses for your messiah Obama. You embarrass yourself, if that’s possible. Basura. Then, about 1.5 – 2 years into Obama’s first term, the “Democratic” Party Cultists finally realised they had been duped once again for the umpteenth time by yet another lying corrupt “Democratic” politician. The dreamy and delusional policies based in wishful-thinking that the “Democratic” Party Cultists had projected onto Mr “Hope” and “Change We Can Believe In” instead became an expansion of the illegitimate Bush/Cheney regime’s policies, along with Obama’s, “We must look forward and not backwards,” meaning he had no intention whatsoever of “going after the Bush regime” as the gullible fools known as the “Democratic” Party Cultists had assured of us that their messiah Obama would do. Fooled again, idiots!

And unfortunately, their partisan brainwashing prevents the fools from learning from the past to change their future behaviour. Not. About. To. Happen. So instead, they keep doing the same thing over and over every s-election cycle and expecting different results. That’s the definition of insanity.

Speaking of insane, mi amigo/my friend and I used to listen to this “Democratic” Party Cultist talk show host. This was years ago. I no longer listen to him — I don’t have the patience to listen to brainwashed partisans — but mi amigo listens to him occasionally just to see if the guy has changed. Of course he hasn’t. That’s impossible. He doesn’t have the ability to change. He’s like a broken record on his show as he has been for decades. He’s another brainwashed “Democrat.” His initials are MM, by the way. Mi amigo tells me that this guy still constantly complains about the misnamed “Democratic” Party all throughout the year. Then, every s-election cycle he gets in authoritarian lockstep and says the same thing he always says before a s-election which is: “We must get Democrats in; we must vote for Democrats.” Mind you, this comes after he’s complained about them all year because they work for their employer, the Republicans. Fucking Insane. Hearing him, it almost sounds like the script he was brainwashed with decades ago, and he’s still repeating it verbatim.

As for the Republican Party Cultists, their campaign slogan seems to be: “For 2018 and Beyond.” I’ve noticed that the insane orange nazi man-child cultists are campaigning against a certain politician no longer in office. Can you guess who it is? They’re campaigning against Obama. Now keep in mind Obama hasn’t been in office for just short of 2 years now. But Obama is all they have to run on. As for the “Democrats,” they’re running on the orange nazi and the Russian connection to the 2016 s-election. In other words, as usual, they have no platform of their own to run on, particularly none of any progressive nature. Heavens no! Wouldn’t dream of it! And should the Republican-enabling “Democrats” happen to gain any seats in the House or Senate — which they absolutely don’t deserve to be rewarded with — one should expect them to give the insane orange nazi/international bully anything he wants. It will be the “Democrats” way of feeling sorry for him because his “team” (and their employer, the Republicans) lost seats in the midterm. Just like they did for illegitimate George W Bush. They gave Bush anything he wanted including Nancy Pelosi taking impeachment “off the table.” Remember that? Shortly after, we saw a picture of Bush and Pelosi walking together holding hands — what did Pelosi’s husband think about that? — as if best of friends, if not more than that. Please check out that picture, por favor. Does that look like someone to you (I’m speaking of Pelosi in that picture) who looks like she’s part of an alleged “opposition party?” LOL. Laughable.

Yet every two years, the “Democratic” Party Cultists in San Francisco who vote continue to put that woman (Pelosi) in office no matter what she does for the Republicans. I suspect most of voters in San Francisco couldn’t tell you a thing she’s done. They merely vote for her based on that “D” for Democrat next to her name, as well as her name recognition and because, “I’ve seen her on television a lot, so I’ll vote for her, and you know I love those pearls around her neck.” (roll eyes, superficial/shallow people)

While writing this article, I read an article about the partisan brainwashing among the orange nazi’s cultists. They can’t distinguish between the truth and lies. Not surprising considering they’re such stupid and proudly-ignorant “people.” And just like the brainwashed “Democrats,” they believe everything that their side says in authoritarian lockstep as well. This blind-faith mentality and cultist behaviour of the orange nazi cultists is no different than what we saw with the Obamabots when they were adoring over their new-found saviour Obama, especially during his first presidential campaign run. (Related: Obama Messiah).

Someone from Ireland wrote the following comment:

“All we see from the far side of the ocean is the US embracing stupidity. You have collectively endorsed President Stupid. Go democracy!”

Well it is true that the US Congress has collectively endorsed him, despite some political theatre and theatrics to the contrary before corporate network cameras for the benefit of the most gullible among us and to pacify their gullible, stupid and partisan-brainwashed base (both D and R). The US Congress has essentially relegated themselves to ceremonial status under the orange nazi. As usual and as predictable, the “Democratic” Party Cultists continue to excuse and rush to apologise for their big business corporate parasites in congress by labeling them “powerless.” Ha! They’re not powerless at all when they vote with the Republicans as they have been doing to give the orange nazi more surveillance powers. Or with Nancy Pelosi taking impeachment “off the table” at least three times now. And I should point out that 41 senate “Democrats” recently enabled the Republicans once again by voting (87-10) for the obscene $708 BILLION spending bill for the US Military Industrial Complex. I don’t call any of that “powerless.” If it were a “Democrat” trying to get such a military bill through, not one Republican would vote for it. The stupid “Democratic” Party Cultists also used that “powerless” excuse when illegitimate George W Bush was in office. One might remember that the “Democrats” gave Bush anything he wanted (including Pelosi taking impeachment of Bush “off the table” as well), as they are doing under the orange nazi man-child. The “Democratic” Party Cultists (meaning the voters) continue to oppose the insane orange-nazi man-child and international bully, but I suspect if he called himself a “Democrat” tomorrow they would flip overnight en masse and begin supporting him and make excuses for him. It all really does come down to brainwashed partisanship and partisan devotion. That’s why I sometimes refer to the “Democratic” and Republican Religions/Faiths. Both are like cults.

The Cesspool/Los Estados Unidos/the US is a country completely divided due to partisan brainwashing, and there’s no way possible to change that. Chau.—el barrio rosa

Related:

Democrats Cave, Agree To Fast Track Tr*mp’s Corporate Judges

——————
1 Such as Pelosi taking impeachment of the insane orange nazi man-child “off the table” at least three times now. She’s a good little enabler.

Here are two examples I mentioned above of the “Democratic” Party enabling the Republican Party. There are many more I could list:

“Now is not the time to consider articles of impeachment,” Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi and Minority Whip Steny Hoyer said in a joint statement, shortly after Green introduced his articles of impeachment.” [Source]

Orange nazi-enabling “Democrats” handed him more domestic surveillance powers.
[Source]

And on 1 August 2018, 41 senate “Democrats” enabled the Republicans by voting (87-10) for the obscene $708 BILLION spending bill for the US Military Industrial Complex. “Gotta get Dems in, gotta get Dems in.” (roll eyes)

Related:

What is an Obamabot?

Obama a “Centrist?” WTF?

Obama and the Transgender Activist

Is Obama Responsible For Gay Marriage?

A Russian Troll ? Wargasm.

Jill Stein should have won

US Democratic Party front sites moving to the right by sanitising their language

Whose Fault for the US Supreme Court?

Expect The Orange Man to serve his full term.

The Orange Man and his supporters hate the US