Floppydextrous, pansexual and more lies from the Porn Industrial Complex

Hola a todos. As I’ve written before, the Porn Industrial Complex is one big lie. It’s hard to know what to believe and the industry is quite homophobic. From some recent videos I’ve watched based on their upload dates, I get the sense that some studios or individuals (homemade) are doing shoots during the COVID pandemic. That’s insane as well as extremely irresponsible. Also see here.

The industry and or their “actors” dream up all of these new terms — that most people have to look up the definition for — to justify them fucking anything for dinero/money. When interviewed, the “actor” often refuses to define his sexuality in understandable terms or uses the terms that society has used for decades and that served us well. One “actor” I saw recently who went from gay to straight videos, when asked about his sexual orientation all he would say was, “I like pretty things. I can’t explain it (meaning why he changed genres). I can explain it: MONEY. It’s all about the MONEY. Even though from what I’ve read, gay porn pays more. Or does this dishonest guy have some gay shame and homophobia issues? He clearly looks and acts like a Queer boy when he’s clean shaven. Seeing a guy who looks like a Queer boy fucking a chick is quite a mind fuck. When he has a beard, he looks more “straight.” Then he added this large tattoo of a half-naked female to his body — is that to make him look more “straight?” — which I’ve never seen on any Queer guys’ bodies that I can think of. The fact is: gay, straight and bi are three terms that have served us well for decades. What’s wrong with those terms now? The sexually fucked-up Millenneals — which is usually the age group of the porn “actors” that come to mind — say those terms are now outdated. They do anything to avoid using those terms. Well anything older than the fucked up Millenneals themselves they consider outdated. (Have I told you how much I can’t stand that generation, with few exceptions, from experiencing them here in Millenneal-Techie San Francisco). I think that many porn “actors” refuse to define their sexuality for fear that something they might say will turn off some viewer and cost them money. So if he says “I’m bi” the viewer who doesn’t like bi guys or has some hangup with that word becomes turned off. Same for the word “gay.” The thinking in the industry these days seems to be: Be as vague, nebulous and nondescriptive as possible. In other words, don’t say anything. Just talk in gibberish. That way no on can be turned off, except pink barrio and some others. The fact is: Language from the 1960s forward is not outdated: straight, bi and gay. The 1960s was when many positive things happened including the struggle for the rights of all people and the sexual language which began widespread usage during that era.

In porn, one person starts using some new word that some nuts dreamed up, then many people start using that word. It’s just some new sex fad word. Some examples: Guys who started out doing gay porn become “homoflexible” — why “homoflexible?” Why not “gayflexible?” — when they start fucking chicks for money (with chemical enhancement assistance to help him keep a hard on). That’s known as straight-for-pay. Oddly, there’s no term yet that I can think of for when straight guys start doing gay sex videos (gay-for-pay). The newest ridiculous term dreamed up is pansexual, which really means that one is bisexual and will fuck anything for pay no matter what the person looks like. They couldn’t just use bisexual? Why “pan?” Apparently they couldn’t use bisexual because bi has a negative connotation with it for many people. Someone wrote “pansexual is very real.” Well, no, it’s not even real for the industry. Most people have likely never heard the term “pansexual.” Most people are not pansexual. Most people will tell you that their sexuality does not change and has not changed since they were born. I had to look up “pansexual” and I keep up on these things. Another fucking new word that some nuts dreamed up when gay, bi and straight were just fine and used for decades.

Sexuality is cemented in one’s DNA. Pansexual implies that one chooses one’s sexuality. Hey, that’s the same shit that the far-right have always said about Queers: “Gays choose to be gay.” So you’re just parroting the far-right’s hate, you fucking morons. Just like that new “identify” shit where people are saying, “I identify as gay” — you can’t just say “I’m gay?” — and “I identify as bi” — you can’t just say “I’m bi?” — which implies that one can change how one “identifies” from day-to-day. So tomorrow or the next day the person could “identify” as straight. Personally, I don’t “identify.” I’m Queer. Period. And I don’t have the patience for all of this deceptive and vague sexual language rubbish that we’re seeing more and more of today used by people who want to dupe others, especially from the Porn Industrial Complex. Fuck Off!

And the real truth is: the younger the person, the more horny the person is for anything. Think: Some teenagers. Is that why I see so many sexually-fucked up Millenneals?

These days, based on all the lies told, the story lines in porn are all over the place.

I watched a video of two guys jacking off. They were watching pussy porn. One of the commenters summed that up nicely: “Not more guys pretending to be str8 for a video. So obvious… oh let’s mention that she has a nice pussy on her, then mention how gay this is, then mention I’m str8 (but I’ll wank you anyway). They couldn’t keep their eyes off each other’s cocks. Why the dumb pretense?! Why not just enjoy sex with another guy without pretending you’re str8 and acting nervous. Ridiculous!”

Yes it is ridiculous, but it’s so typical these days. Our society has made tremendous progress sexually. [sarcasm intended]. In reality, it feels like we’re barely beyond the 1950s sexually.

A few days later, I watched a short video of two guys jacking each other off seated at a desk. They took turns with each other. Both were wearing left hand wedding rings which the viewers interpreted as “these are straight guys.” Really? Why make that baseless assumption? Many gay guys unfortunately wear their wedding rings on the same finger as the breeders which confuses the gay guys for being straight. Is that the intent? Why would gay guys want to be confused for being straight if there were not some internalised homophobia going on? Because that image of a left hand wedding ring on the fourth finger is cemented in most people’s mind as breeder-straight sexuality/wedLOCK. These two guys who jacked off each other in the video had straight porn playing in the background but neither guy seemed to be watching it with some annoying “ho” screaming. So either they were two Queer guys and wanted viewers to think they were straight (hence the straight porn playing in the background), or they were two (closeted?) bi guys. Genuine straight guys are not into other guys or into playing with dick, if they are really truly straight. Or they could be latent bi guys and in the closet and trying to come out. But someone in the comments had to talk about them being “pansexual” just because they were jacking each other off. (roll eyes). But this is the stuff that one reads in the comments. People make thoughtless and baseless comments about the people in the video. Someone said, “It’s not being gay if you have straight porn on at the same time.” No, you wouldn’t want to be gay or thought of as being gay. No, we can’t have that in 2020! Sigh. jesus fucking christ. We’ve made so much progress haven’t we? NOT. In many ways, things are no different today than the homophobic way things were when the Gay Rights Movement began. Especially since it seems and feels like most Queers have gone back in the fucking closet.

In fact, it’s so rare to see a gay male couple in San Francisco anymore. What was once the Gay Mecca is now the Breeder Mecca. “Him-tall-dominant and Her-short-submissive” (feminism is dead) everywhere you look shoving their breeder sexuality in our faces with their required hand-holding, arm-in-arm embraces, making out on the sidewalks and the like. Obnoxious.

On his walks, mi amigo/my friend tells me all he says are single females with dogs. Yes, there are no shortage of annoying females here I can vouch for that. My area of San Francisco used to be full of Queer boys. Not today. Today, all I hear are the voices of fucking breeders going by my apartment. And it’s usually her loud and obnoxious voice broadcasting to the neighbourhood and every-other-word she says is the word “like.” Chau.—el barrio rosa