Category Archives: Posts

It already feels like we’re back where we started (circa 1970s)

Gay and with a girl. A gay guy with a girl. Here in the Century of Insanity, it’s supposed to be a (closeted) gay guy with a chick holding hands and making out or where she’s giving him a blow job on an airliner due to society’s Breeder Brainwashing, where he can be seen talking with his bros about how “we’re trying to get pregnant.” Is that what they meant by “gay assimilation” (roll eyes, groan) after gay marriage became legal in the US? So gay guys worked years for the right to marry their boyfriend/partner. Then ultimately, many — due to Breeder Brainwashing — married females. Insanity.

Hola a todos. During the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement — which by all indications ended when gay marriage became legal in the US of Insanity, see here and here — we Queers (GTQBLs) worked so hard for many thing over decades including coming out of the closet so that we could be ourselves, be true to ourselves and honest about ourselves with others. I don’t know why, but I had mistakenly thought this would be a permanent fixture to our society, that from that point on Queers would not be behaving as if they were living back in the 1940s-50s.

Yeah well. So much for that thinking. All of that seems to be passé now. I’ll write about this one more time for purposes of this article, but frankly I now feel about this topic and all Queer-related topics the same way I feel about the toxic topic of politics. I’m sick of all of it. I’m very turned off by all of it because of the dismal state of things. I don’t need my blood pressure rising to unhealthy levels because of this shit. So, I’m done with it after this article because only a few people care and the few of us who do care are not about to change the world or change anything with the corporatist, conformist “LGBT”-brainwashed sheeple. Fuck them. They don’t represent me at all. (Related: Lea DeLaria: The LGBTQIA+ acronym is divisive and it’s also revisionist history since lesbians did not lead the Movement as the “L” in first place implies). And I know they’re the conservative — regardless of D or R partisan-brainwashed affiliation — conformist majority. We’re not about to stop closet case gay guys from being with and marrying females in droves. (Related: More back to the 1950s: Gay guys marrying females in droves. Sad. This is what the Movement worked for for many decades, is it? Insanity!). Nearly every day mi amigo/my friend will be watching a video on U-toob and says to me, “Queer boy with female.” Ugh. I hesitate to go see his screen because I don’t need to see another closet case, but there he is: Yet another gay guy according to our gaydar with a female in a breeder relationship eating ice cream together or making out/sucking face in line while waiting to order their food. While making out, they make sure to make loud slurping sounds so that everybody hears them. They love the attention. Isn’t that why they make out in public? Exhibitionism? I’m well aware that needy, insecure and attention-demanding her has to be reassured every couple minutes that he still loves her. “Please kiss me to let me know you still love me and haven’t fallen out of love with me in the past 2 minutes when you kissed me one-half block away and I demand that you hold my hand otherwise you won’t get any pussy later.” (roll eyes, gay couple are so much more secure and mature in their relationships than the insecure breeders). The closet case has been brainwashed with society’s heteronormative Breeder Brainwashing which is: One must be straight to be “normal.” And the corporate media dutifully promote breeder brainwashing everywhere you look. It’s always images of “him and her.” He’s usually a minimum of 2 feet taller than her to dominate over submissive, non-feminist her. When they make out, he looks like he’s making out with a little girl, perhaps his daughter. Watching the corporate media, one would not know that gay marriage even exists in the States except for — the apparently more acceptable to bigots — conservative-looking white lesbian couples shown on the rarest occasion, when any Queer couple is shown. Gay male couples don’t exist based on what one sees from the corporate media, including the international corporate media from my observations. They’re just as bad. (Related: Breeder Brainwashing: Another gay guy marries a woman, and Gay guys are not equal). And if you happen to fleetingly find a gay male couple on the corporate media, are they allowed to make out before the cameras the way the pro-patriarchy him-tall-dominant/her-short-submissive breeder couples do, stopping short of having sex?

So it leaves me with this deep sense of sinking depression that comes over me when I see a 20-30 year old guy who — according to my reliable gaydar — is obviously a closet case and doesn’t have the cojones to come out of the closet bouncing down the sidewalk holding hands with some giddy 20-30 year old female as they head into San Francisco’s Castro. Reminds me of three articles I wrote sometime back:

1. Closeted Gays moving into San Francisco’s Castro.

2. “Best bar in Castro for Closeted Gays”

3. Are gays going back in the closet?

The Castro is the former Gay Mecca. But with The Castro’s deliberate over-saturation of Rainbow Flags intended to deceive tourists into thinking that it’s still a Gay Mecca, I suspect one is quite disappointed when one comes to the awareness that The Castro is now a Breeder Mecca. I suspect Queer tourists ask: “Where are all the gay guys, where are all the lesbians I expected to see here in The Gay Mecca?” Answer: They’re mostly gone, and the ones you do see can be visitors so don’t assume they live here. This Millennial couple (the closet case holding hands with the giddy female that I mentioned earlier) are likely going to The Castro to drink like all the other “breeder couples” we see, even though the guy looks gay to me, but he’s been Breeder Brainwashed. They’re going to get drunk and make out under Rainbow Flags — which is why some of us say that it feels like the breeders have hijacked the Rainbow Flag considering the way they love to make out under it (roll eyes) — and later have “breeder sex.” That’s typically what one sees in today’s Castro, excluding 1-2 bars which are still gay bars.

If I were straight, it would feel weird to me to be hanging out in an area saturated with Rainbow Flag symbolism and where there are still a few gay guys, regardless of where they really live (East Bay, South Bay, North Bay, Los Ángeles, the East Coast or elsewhere). I’d feel as though I were intruding on someone’s territory, and an area with a rich Queer history, even though The Castro looks nothing like it did. It’s like a faint museum relic of that today. My thinking as a straight person would be that we breeders have the entire world for rubbing our breeder sexuality into people’s faces whether they want to see it or not, so why do I need to hang out in or move to this little area that was once a special safe area for gay guys to live and hang out and where a few gay guys can still be seen on the odd occasion? Or is the breeder’s attitude similar to or the same as the straight guy we saw holding hands with a female recently where his shirt said: “Fuck you, homo.” (San Francisco’s Castro). Perhaps their thinking is: “We don’t give a fuck about your Rainbow Flags. We just ignore them because we’ve taken over this neighbourhood, in case you haven’t noticed.” Some of us remember when we were told by the conservatives — including the conservative Castro merchants who were in the process of sanitising The Castro to make it acceptable to the prudish conservative breeders with their screaming babies — that “Gay people can now live anywhere.” Of course that was absolute rubbish! As I’ve written many times, gay/Queer people can’t live anywhere even in the fucking closet. Sane people understand this. One has to be constantly watching one’s back depending upon where one lives. But the conservatives — regardless of their partisan-brainwashed political alignment — never let facts get in their way, such as these: The FBI Says Hate Crimes Are Soaring (November 2018) and here. I have found that the conservatives operate solely on emotion and with a deliberate willful-ignorance. Two conservatives I once had experience with come to mind. I corrected them on several things and gave them credible links to articles, yet they continued to ignore that information and spewed out their ignorance because they have an agenda. They are deliberately ignorant. When they were asked: Have you read the article I linked to contradicting what you have said repeatedly? The response: “Maybe I’m not interested in it.” Sigh. Someone like that prefers to be stupid and ignorant because the information I provided contradicts his right-wing agenda. I can’t stand people like that.

There is one aspect where it does not feel like we’re back where we started and that is because gay areas of cities are nothing like the way they were back then, such as San Francisco’s Castro, West Hollywood and Chelsea in Manhattan: Chelsea: The Death of a Gay Neighborhood, Murdered by Neo-Hetero-Homophobes. I’ve always had mixed feelings about The Castro. It was a wild barrio/neighbourhood and that was a good thing as far as I was concerned. “Anything goes here” was the way it was. It’s nothing like that now. It’s very conservative now to the extreme that awhile back there was a group interested in “Queering The Castro.” Can you believe that? That’s indicative of how far and how extreme The Castro has come from its Queer roots. I found The Castro to be very cliquish. It was very frustrating. Mi amigo/My friend says it’s still like that at his gym with the few Queer guys there. They only talk with each other and put their noses up in the air if you’re not part of their (elitist) group. I don’t have the patience for such childishness. With people, as far as I’m concerned we’re all equal. So I’ll pretty much talk with anybody regardless of their “social standing.” (Roll eyes) In The Castro, most of the guys I was interested in on a physical level had no interest in me. Over the years, I found The Castro to be class-ist with the homeowners versus the renters, even though many if not most homeowners were once renters themselves. It was on rare occasions that I felt accepted as a Queer person in The Castro, which makes me ask: Was there ever a genuine gay community? Just because a group of people were together on occasion for Queer events or had/have similar sexual interests doesn’t necessarily make them a genuine community when some are welcome if they look a certain way, act a certain way and have enough money, and others are not.

Then there’s today: Is The Castro the only place in San Francisco where breeders or closet cases come to make out and have “straight sex?” That’s honestly the way it appears. When I’m in Manhattan — that’s what I call San Francisco’s Financial District — I never see anyone making out there or holding hands. Even obnoxious breeder couples are not desperately making out there. And part of Breeder Brainwashing is that a guy is supposed to love the smell of pussy because that makes him a “real man.” Also, per Breeder Brainwashing a “real man” is also supposed to be into any and all discharges from pussy, including menstrual period discharges. I’m not making this up. That’s what I’ve read from guys claiming that that’s what “real men” like. Here’s The Ultimate Color Guide to Vaginal Discharge if you’d like to read up on that. But, per Breeder Brainwashing, a “real man” does not want to try to get rid of any rank musky odors from pussy because of course that contradicts the concept of being a “real man.” But I’ll provide the link anyway to be as thorough as possible: 7 Tips for Getting Rid of Vaginal Odor. Also, I should point out that despite how breeder sex is extremely over-hyped with words such as “pussy is amazing, awesome and paradise,” when you think about it, the vagina itself is in the wrong place. It should be at a place where a guy’s dick automatically stimulates the clitoris when he’s inside the vagina. But that’s not the case. It’s as if women are built wrong. That Christian god fellow who we are told supposedly made peoplekind didn’t seem to think that through. “He” didn’t put the opening of the vagina right at the clitoris so that the clit would automatically be stimulated when she’s getting fucked. Instead, the god fellow put the vagina way down at the bottom, near her anus, not near her clitoris. Consequently, with the female anatomy, the clit does not get stimulated at all when a guy is fucking her and there are very few nerve endings inside the vagina. So the woman is left being sexually unsatisfied while the guy is fucking her. Related: No pleasure during female sex. Also, pussy must not be all that hot for the guy either despite all the hype to the contrary because I can’t begin to count the number of breeder sex videos (also known as straight porn) I’ve watched where it takes the guy forever and a day to cum regardless of his age. He fucks her pussy nonstop and all kinds of positions to try to orgasm and it’s just not happening, and these are people who presumably like to get off on having sex before cameras, otherwise they wouldn’t do it! So it’s not as if they’re camera shy but rather exhibitionists since they willingly video record their sexual encounters. It can take up to 45 minutes or more for the guy to cum. In the end, he often jacks off. Something is wrong with that! If her pussy was as “hot” as pussy is marketed to be by our Breeder Brainwashed society, he would have cum within the first couple minutes, because again, we’re told that pussy is “amazing, awesome and paradise.” Mi amigo/My friend who started out with pussy before he came out of the closet, completely disagrees with that. He says pussy was no big deal, a turn-off in fact, and he couldn’t stand the smell no matter how much she washed it. A smell of some rankness is always there. He’s told me of how he and his guy friends were floating down a river on inner-tubes. They made sure the females were in front of them (or down-wind) so that their menstrual blood would flow down-river and not into the guy’s inner-tube. By the second day, he said the guys would have to stay up-wind from the females because it was a hot Summer week and the females were just wearing bathing suits. He also says that when he was in the army that the guys would use whipped cream if they had to eat pussy. At that time he says that Black guys didn’t eat pussy. It was just the young white guys that did that. He also said that in those days that there was no him-tall/her-short with breeder couples. That they were pretty much the same height as most gay couples are today and always have been. He also said that from his experience, because of a female’s emotional instability and where she acts like an emotional train wreck, he found a female to be the worst travel companion one can have.

Leaving his gym near The Castro the other morning, mi amigo/my friend said motorists couldn’t get into the underground garage near the gym because a Millennial breeder couple was standing in the middle of the entrance way desperately making out — if not having sex right there, he couldn’t tell which — on the sidewalk as if they had just met via their phone and couldn’t wait another minute. They seemed oblivious to anyone. Yes, that’s the typical behaviour of the breeders around here. Inconsiderate self-absorbed assholes. He said it was a repeat of what he saw in the gym a couple of weeks ago where a Millennial breeder couple was blocking the door entrance to the change room. People couldn’t get in and out of the change room easily, and this breeder couple had no intention of moving their telenovela-style make-out session to another location to be courteous to others. Courteous to others? What’s that, in the New San Francisco? That doesn’t seem to be something that the “I’m super special and it’s all about me” seemingly-lobotomised cold Millennial generation was taught. They don’t seem to have been taught much of anything (no people skills), other than phone.

Ironically, it wasn’t that long ago that breeders complained about and reprimanded Queers about “shoving your Queer sexuality in our breeder faces. We don’t want to see you kissing, making out and holding hands in public” they said. Well clearly it’s fine when they do it. Their blatant hypocrisy and homophobia is noted.

I have to say that, at this point, overall it feels like we Queers are back where we started — I’m thinking circa 1970 — and I don’t remember seeing this ridiculous behaviour of a female holding hands and making out with a closet case and pretending to be a breeder/straight couple and him and her pumping out babies in the Old City when San Francisco was a major, internationally-known Gay Mecca. Nor did I see that behaviour in my former home city, the District of Columbia. We saw a lot of things here in San Francisco during the Gay Mecca, but that wasn’t one of them. But I see it now and frequently, and often it depresses me because it honestly feels like we’re back where we started in the 1970s. Although as I said, I don’t remember seeing that scene with closet cases trying to be “straight” or pretending to be a breeder and making out with females. But that’s what we’re seeing in the Century of Insanity here in the US.

It’s hard to find anything that looks “Out and Proud” anymore. In fact, it looks the opposite. “Out and Proud” is long gone. Back in the closet is what we see today.

We’ve entered what appears to be a very dark time — in part because of the insane asylum known as the White House and the D and R government at the federal level — and the draconian policies we’re seeing these days. I brought this up with our little local group of Queers last week. Surprisingly they agreed with me. They said that what I described feels the same way to them, although each person said, “I try not to think about it because it depresses me too.” I had thought it was just me.

I ran into one of the Queer guys in my apartment building recently. We stopped and talked a bit about this. He said, “I don’t even go into The Castro anymore to the bars because of all the straight girls there.” Sigh. Then I mentioned all the straight guys in The Castro or those guys who want one to think they’re straight. He said, “Catch them on the right night they won’t be straight. They’ll be looking for sex with a guy ‘on the down low’ and ‘discreet.” He’s right and that’s about the extent of it. They’re not fooling anyone. Closet cases. And I used to see that all the time when I was reading CL men-seeking-men personals when that was around.

One thing I’ve noticed about the closet cases with females is how they go out of their way to convince everyone that they’re supposedly straight. For example, I went grocery shopping recently and saw this guy and instantly said to myself: Oh there’s a gay boy. I looked at him as we passed but he didn’t look at me. He sort of looked like a Castro Street clone from the 1970s, but a more modern version of that. Then, mi amigo/my friend walked over to me and asked: “Did you see that gay guy heavily making out with that chick over by the cakes? They were going at it for about 5 minutes. I thought they were going to fuck right there.” I quietly asked mi amigo: The gay guy right there? (Mi amigo later told me that he thought it was funny that we both knew the guy was Queer at first glance, but the guy may not even know that he’s Queer, or does and is completely closeted. I thought his behaviour was weird overall in that he never looked at anyone in the store as if his head didn’t turn left or right). Mi amigo said: “Yeah that’s the guy right there.” I said: Well, their make-out session which I fortunately missed must not have done anything for him because he doesn’t have a hard-on. Then, I saw the guy talking with his chick and thought: He’s into her? She’s the best he can get? I didn’t find her at all attractive. She acted ditzy, and dumbed-down. She looked prematurely “old.” She looked haggered for her age. Having been “well-banged?” They were the same height though amazingly. I watched them from a distance. He was doing his instinctual gay mannerisms with gay-clueless her but neither of them looked at anyone in the store. He had to give her peck-kisses every now and then to reassure Ms Needy-Insecure that he was still into her, supposedly. A few seconds later, they had the typical argument that straight couples are known for having usually caused by the female’s emotional swings. Even when they were talking at distances from each other (15 feet apart), their eyes never wandered from each other and acted oblivious to anyone else in the store. This is part of an act I’ve seen repeatedly from allegedly-straight couples. They pretend to be so into each other and oblivious to anyone else and the gay guy especially tries to go out of his way to convince everyone in the surroundings — not that anyone cares! — that he’s straight so they put on these heavy-duty, over-the-top exhibitionist type make-out scenes in grocery stores and elsewhere for the benefit of others. It’s surprising that they don’t sell tickets to their early morning, matinée and evening performances in stores. This gay guy only gave one performance with additional quick pecks on her lips that I saw as they stood right in the middle of the aisle. But he was your typical closet case trying to make other people think that he was straight. Another fucked-up gay guy. And of course he was a young and white conservative-looking Millennial. What is it with that fucked-up generation? She didn’t seem to possess a phone but he had to get on his phone at one point. When he was on his phone, I thought: You better watch it, you’re not giving Ms Needy your full attention. She’s going to wonder: Who is he talking with now and ignoring me on that phone? Is he fixing up a sex date with some guy after he just heavily made-out with me over here by the cakes?

It seems appropriate for this article that I conclude with this email I received from an acquaintance of mine. He’s from a former job where we were co-workers. He lives in Upper Market. It’s good to hear from him. He wrote:

“Read your site often. You wouldn’t recognize Upper Market today. Snotty as all hell! Not sure how often you get up here but it’s fucking annoying with gay guys with girl friends. They’re making out, holding hands and who knows what. A friend of mine told me he thinks these are gay guys seeing all the straight guys around here making out with girls and think they need to “go straight” too to fit in. You and I know that doesn’t work. They’ll figure that out that eventually. There are a few gay couples up here but they’re just as snotty and won’t even look at me. You’ve written about the tall-short him and her. Doesn’t that look ridiculous? Saw one yesterday. He was about 7 feet tall, no shit! She was about 4.5 feet tall. Looked like he was making out with a kid. He about toppled over on her trying to kiss her because she was not big enough to hold his weight. Like you say we’re living in insane times.”

See what I mean? These are some examples of why it feels like we are back where we started, circa 1970s. I appreciate his e-mail.

Yes, society’s Breeder Brainwashing which tries to talk everybody into being straight whether they are or not — is extremely effective, at least for awhile, until the closet cases have enough of that caca. I wonder how the closet cases are getting on with the smell of pussy and its discharges that I mentioned earlier. What excuses are being used for being repulsed by that? Some women are not stupid or in denial in this context and they know deep down that “their man” is gay but living a lie, such as this guy: This Gay Mormon Man Who Got Famous For Marrying A Straight Woman Is Getting Divorced. Fin. The End. Chau.—el barrio rosa

Why gay guys should wear their wedding rings on their right hand

As gay guys and lesbians do throughout Europe.

Hola a todos. Below are two e-mails I received from readers regarding my article about Gay Wedding Ring Deception, and their experiences.

Sean wrote:

I agree that it would make it sooooooooooooo much easier if gay people wore their wedding rings on their right hand because of the prejudiced people out there. Take what happened at my job for instance. We recently had an uncomfortable situation because we had to do some guessing over who a sales rep was married to. We’ve had this sales person come in our office for about the last yr. I and another guy have been working with him. We had a pretty good relationship or so I thought. I always thought he was gay and still do but he’s in the closet and married a woman. On his last visit I noticed he had a wedding ring on (left hand) for the first time. It was sort of flashy which caused me to notice it. I said to the guy is that a new wedding ring on your finger? He said yep sure is, yeah I got married. Then there was dead silence. I said to a woman or a man? That’s when things really shifted down hill fast. He said in a very slow and nasty way, “To a woman, of course, dude, the way it’s supposed to be with man and woman.” I asked him if he hasn’t heard of gay marriage? He started turning all red and said, “There’s no such thing as gay marriage in my book. Listen up buddy, I’m not like that.” Whoa, that threw me for a loop. I said well I am “like that” using finger quotes to him. I’m gay and I was wondering if you had married your boyfriend or whatever. He said, “No, no boyfriend here buddy, trust me, like I said, I’m not like that.” I asked him you can’t say the word gay? He quickly started packing up and said he would be asking headquarters to send another rep to our office. Whoa! I told him that we’d be all for that because I didn’t know you were a bigot *and* a closet case. He walked out after a few more words were spoken. Then I got an e-mail the next day saying we had a new rep. I wrote back questioning if the new rep would be a bigot too and explained what happened in our office. No response to date.

That’s the problem with some gay guys wearing their wedding rings on the breeder finger as you call it. It’s a very delicate thing to deal with if the guy is anti-gay as this guy was which I didn’t know about until this happened. As he left under his breath I heard him say “fucking faggot.” I yelled “I heard that and because you’re a closet case you’re talking about yourself!” He yelled back “Fuck you” and some other words. We locked the doors after he left following that encounter and have added security to the building. His actions and hostility were so typical of the closet cases I’ve met in a few gay bars and online experiences.

These days a guy can be married to a guy, or to a woman. Like you said the confusion arises when a gay guy wears his wedding ring on his left hand. If this guy were gay and wearing his wedding ring on his right hand fourth finger like you talked about this situation wouldn’t have happened. But when both straight and gay guys are wearing their wedding rings on the same finger how is one to tell? Point being – Gays and lesbians wearing their wedding ring on the left hand leads to confusion whereas the right hand doesn’t. My experience proves the points you made in your article. Yours is the first article about this I’ve seen anywhere where anyone is even talking about it. Thanks for taking the time to write it.—Sean

Then Julián sent this e-mail:

“Hola, read your gay wedding ring deception post. I’m a NYC resident, work in Manhattan and do some of the training in my department of the firm. Hired a new guy to work for us recently. Nice guy. Thought he was gay but wasn’t sure until we had 1 on 1 training in our conference room and I spotted a wedding band on his right hand, fourth finger like you wrote about. It wasn’t until the second day of training after he had warmed up to me where we felt more like brothers from all the time we’d spent together that we were sitting side by side. I said to him while touching his finger ‘hey nice ring, you married your boyfriend?’ He said, “Yes I did, as soon as we were able to.” I said, “I didn’t think you were a breeder (he laughed at that) because they wear their rings on their left hand.” “That’s true,” he said. He pulled out his phone and showed me pictures of his partner and the two of them together. I told him “You’re a cute couple.” That made his day. He was glowing. I told him that my boyfriend and I plan to get married at some point. He really opened up with me after that. The mood in the room changed quickly after that experience. Really nice. You’re right. It should be gay marriage right hand, straight marriage (or what you call breeder marriage – hahahahaha – I like that!!) left hand. Makes things so much easier. There’s no guessing with that, and like you said who wants to be mistaken for a breeder? :-) Thanks, gracias.—Julián

Gracias to you both for taking the time to write me. I appreciate it. Chau.—el barrio rosa

The Tombstone on the Grave of the US Gay Community reads:

Birth of Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement: May 1959 with the Cooper’s Donuts Riot in Los Ángeles. (Earliest recorded activism by Queers, mainly gay guys, trans individuals and Drag Queens. Cooper’s Donuts was a popular gay meeting place).
Death of Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement: June 2015.

Don't Stop Print

Hola a todos. Can you image the now-dead so-called “gay community” rioting about anything today here in 2019? I’m afraid I can’t. Or even just protesting something like the end of gay marriage? Or do they even care about that now? They have become quite the conservative conformist Establishment boot lickers. However, if PrEP were to be discontinued, that would be another story. Or if their phones went dark one would see a worldwide meltdown. And by the way, I went into Wikipedia to research some things for this article, and the revisionist history “LGBT” corporatists had already struck there too. As I had noticed before, they seem to have used a robot to change the language to “LGBT” on every site on the internet even changing the language in gay historical archives. Yes, on Wikipedia, they referred to “LGBT” in 1959. That is incorrect. That is a lie. It is revisionist history. I know that lying is “in” today but in 1959, it was not called “LGBT.” It was called “GLBT(Q)” as in Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement. Brand “LGBT”(TM) is the more recent — in historical perspective — dishonest revisionist history I’ve written so much about where self-entitled and self-absorbed lesbians hijacked our Movement, and moved themselves to first place in that silly “LGBT” acronym trying to take credit for work they didn’t do, and gay men are so busy looking at their phones comparing one dick to another that they didn’t even notice that lesbians had hijacked our Movement, nor do they care, seemingly about anything! It has nothing to do with them, they think. Lesbians did not lead the Movement as “LGBT” implies. Gay guys did along with trans individuals. Today’s priorities for most gay guys are: Phone, dick size (usually indicated in internet inches), partying with meth and other drugs and endless sex dates with or without PrEP.

This is a belated obituary. It seems that unfortunately no one thought to write an obituary for the expired-deceased “Gay Community” in the US. How thoughtless of people. I guess they were too busy conforming and “assimilating” following the Decree for us Queers to “Assimilate with the straights/breeders” issued by those busy-bodied heteronormative corporatists after gay marriage became legal here in The Cesspool/the US. Either that or they wanted to forget about The Movement altogether, and an obituary would acknowledge that The Movement had existed to begin with. So, skip that.

Someone may be asking, “What do you mean that the US gay community is dead? How can you say that?” Well let me ask you: Assuming one has been paying close attention since gay marriage became legal, what have you seen happen with and to the so-called “gay community” (whatever that means today, not much) since gay marriage became legal in the US on June 26, 2015? Some of our little local group of Queers here in San Francisco have reported to me that they’ve had people ask them, “What’s up with the Gay Rights Movement? I can’t remember seeing anything about it since gay marriage became legal.” Yes. It would appear to be dead — just like the anti-war movement — and this obituary article addresses that.

Interestingly, I read this blurb while writing another article recently about Gay Wedding Ring Deception. Here’s what I read:

“Marriage equality was widely regarded as the last frontier for gay-rights activists.” [Source]. That’s the first time I have read that anywhere. Ah hah! So it wasn’t my imagination that gay marriage becoming legal in the US was oddly the end of the Movement when I wrote this article: What was the ultimate goal of the Gay Rights Movement?

There’s been nothing since even though many problems still exists for the so-called “gay community” (whatever that means now; there’s absolutely no feel or sense of community whatsoever).

Therefore, I thought I would write an obituary for the now-deceased US gay community, which follows:

The US gay community came to a sudden, unexpected and tragic ending the evening of June 26, 2015 when the announcement was made that the US Supreme Court had legalised marriage equality allowing Queers to marry. Who knew that this was the last goal of the Movement? I remember that night rather well. Queers poured into Harvey Milk Plaza in San Francisco’s Castro to celebrate. During one of the syrupy speeches where the speakers spoke as if they were talking to children, we were given the Decree to “Assimilate with the straights.” WTF? Unfortunately, the majority of Queers misinterpreted that Decree and what it meant. I didn’t like the sound of that Decree when I heard it as I had always been as “assimilated” with the breeders as I cared to be. I’ve never held the breeders up as any model on how I should live my life. But nevertheless, from that night on to today, the majority of Queers like a bunch of sheeple engaged in some or all of the following (strange) behaviour as if having flipped out as a result of being able to get married legally:

1. By becoming the opposite of who and what they were as a Queer person. During The Movement, most Queers were “proudly radical and alternative.” Today? The opposite: Nothing “proudly radical and alternative” here. They appear to be mostly conservative and we’ve seen that in San Francisco’s Castro, especially with the conservative homeowner basura who have helped to sanitise The Castro. Who knew that they wanted to turn The Castro into another breeder Marina district?

Note about this: Based on their behaviour and decisions since gay marriage became legal in the US and the Decree for “Assimilation with the straight” was issued, it appears that many Queers deep down wanted to be straight or at least pretend to be. It’s just that they have a problem with females “below the belt” as I’ve heard it spoken about. Rarely do they speak about a female’s erratic emotions and drastic mood swings. Speaking about that doesn’t usually come until after one has been in a relationship with a female to experience that.

2. By wearing one’s Queer wedding ring on the “breeder finger” (the same hand as the breeders – left hand fourth finger) rather than on the “Queer finger” (right hand fourth finger – Related: Gay Wedding Ring Deception. To many breeders your relationship is not the same as theirs.) One would have hoped that most Queers would have upheld the time-honoured Queer tradition which goes back to at least circa 1983-85 in Europe — and whether symbolic or legally married — of wearing one’s wedding ring on the right-hand fourth finger.

3. By going back in the closet and referring to oneself as “discreet” and “down low,” which is the opposite of “Out and Proud.” The latter had been the slogan during the Movement.

A note about this: When one is a minority (Queer) in a majority of breeders and told to “fit in” with them and “conform” (“assimilate”) many Queer people have subsequently gone back in the closet to “blend in” with the breeders. That’s partly why this corporatist Decree to “Assimilate with the straights” was so terribly misguided.

4. By adopting a toxic masculinity — in many cases — to be like the macho breeder jock bros that one sees posing to check out their macho stance and dropping weights in gyms, and behaving like an obnoxious jock bro elsewhere (Related: We Need To Talk About Toxic Gay Masculinity, as well as this article: Why some gay men should worry more about their maturity than their masculinity, and of course the same thing can be said about the breeder/straight guys. It’s not just some gay guys who have a maturity problem).

5. By becoming corporate sports jocks to mirror the behaviour of obnoxious jock breeder guys who were moving into and taking over gay areas. Also, by frequenting “gay sports bars” whose clientele more resembled “discreet” and “down low” closet cases with some talking about “banging chicks” to emulate breeder bros.

A note about this behaviour: Historically, there have always been a few Queers into (corporate) sports although I never knew of any, but nothing like the number of gay guys (mostly) that I’m talking about here where it’s become this silly fad to be into corporate sports teams and hear male grunting sounds and roars coming from gay bars in The Castro the night that “the game” is on to hear cheer leading for a local corporate sports team. Why all excited about corporate sports teams owned by millionaires/billionaires? The original Movement was anti-corporate! Just because the corporate sports team has a “Gay Day” once a year to exploit Queer$ for their dinero/money? Never mind the anti-gay jokes made in locker rooms following the games. This has been strange behaviour to observe since historically and to this day it was and still is the jocks who bully gay guys in sports and on playgrounds. So why would gay guys take on this personae? This is what our Movement worked decades for? Insanity. What makes one a jock today? Wearing a baseball cap. That’s it. All you have to do is to wear a baseball cap and you’re automatically a jock whether you’re with “a girl” and in the closet and pretending to be straight or not. You don’t need to do any exercise or work-out. Also, with many if not most (closet case) gay jocks they have taken on this US nationalistic, pro-military, pro-gun, redneck, white pride personae. As I said, the opposite of who they were as people before gay marriage became legal and the Decree to “Assimilate with the straights” was issued.

Is this what those busy-bodied, extremely-short-sighted idiots at those elitist Queer organisations who issued that Decree expected to happen? Insanity.

6. By their widespread use of the word “bi” in gay guy’s personal sex ads with most gay guys abandoning the word “gay” (not wanting to be seen as “gay” because of negative cultural stereotypes with the word?) or even as GWM (Gay White Male) or GM (Gay Male) to describe oneself. Instead, most gay guys label themselves as bi even though most have no sexual interest in women because they’re gay.

A note about this: One cannot convince me that the so-called “gay community” became the “bi community” en masse almost overnight, because human sexuality doesn’t work that way en masse. Note: I’m not talking about genuine bisexual people here. I’m talking about the gay guys who are lying, the frauds who are referring to themselves as “bi” because they think that makes them sound more “manly” and “macho” and “jock” and closer to being straight because genuine bi guys also fuck pussy. And according to some with their toxic masculinity: “fucking pussy makes one a ‘real man’.” (roll eyes)

7. By abandoning Rainbow Flag colours and dressing like the monochrome conformist Millennial breeders who seem to be absolutely terrified of any colour. Instead, they wear depressed funeral colours of all-black and or casket-grey accompanied by a depressed facial expression. (I’d be depressed too if I had to wear black and grey every fucking day of the year to “Assimilate with the breeders”). Fuck the breeders.

8. By getting a girlfriend and or wife and begin breeding (Related: More back to the 1950s: Gay guys marrying females in droves. Sad.) Or by getting a wing woman (closet case)

9. By removing earrings because most breeder guys don’t wear earrings.

10. By growing a breeder hipster beard since “real men” have beards “for eating pussy.”

11. By adopting heteronormative back-in-the-closet behaviour: Pretending to now be straight (back in the closet) and holding hands and making out with females at Castro/Market under the giant Rainbow Flag, at 18th and Castro or along Market Street after frequenting the “gay gym” for years.

12. By talking with another jock bro about one’s wife or girlfriend that you’re trying to get pregnant while working out at The Castro (gay) gym.

Note: Script writers couldn’t dream this shit up, but all of this is true and what we’ve seen here in San Francisco’s flipped-out Castro.

13. By erasing and or pretending that the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement never existed

14. By adopting a prudish mindset and hating on the few naked guys in The Castro’s Jane Warner Plaza using the conservative breeder excuse of “What about the children?” That excuse is only used when it comes to nudity and body image issues. Any other time they don’t give a fuck about “the children.” In fact, they support politicians who vote to cut or end programmes to help children’s lives. Their blatant hypocrisy is noted.

15. By adopting the worst traits of Republican conservative breeders while “identifying” as a Democrat.

16. By using the word “identify” to describe one’s sexuality rather than just saying, “I’ve always been gay” instead of “I identify as gay” which implies one can change one’s sexuality on the whim depending upon the day, which the far-right will be delighted to hear since they have long held the view that “being gay is a choice.” I’m seeing more and more of this “identify” shit. What conservative corporatist dreamed of that “identify” nonsense?

17. By the unspoken but perceived widespread thinking that “It’s now bad to be gay.” So pretend to be straight to “Assimilate with the breeders.”

18. By putting all of one’s personal Rainbow Flags back in closet, often with the person, as if ashamed of them.

19. By showing no Queer symbols on one’s person so that another Queer person can easily spot another Queer person. No, those symbols are gone, back in the closet.

20. By supporting conservative draconian politicians who charade as “a moderate” with a “D” next to their name, such as that awful Scott Penis who is directly responsible for helping to ruin/sanitise San Francisco’s Castro.

21. By joining and or supporting the US Military Industrial Complex (Related: Why do Queers want to kill other Queers ? and What do I think about the transgender ban in the US Military?

22. By supporting militaristic US White House residents.

23. By supporting their messiah pro-Establishment politician Obama instead of a transgender activist (Related: Obama and the Transgender Activist.

A word about that: I observed the corporatist Obamabots refusing to support the trans activist in this gathering in the White House. Instead they served as boot lickers for their saviour Obama. Rather disgusting behaviour. It was yet another indicator to me that the so-called “gay community” had completely lost themselves and were now mainstream pro-Establishment brainwashed-partisan corporatists. They had become the exact opposite of who they were. Disgusting and pathetic.

24. By welcoming the US Military Industrial Complex to “SF Pride” (Related: San Francisco GLBTQs celebrate the US Military Industrial Complex).

Note that it’s called “SF Pride.” What happened to the word Gay or Gay and Lesbian, as in “SF Gay Pride?” That was removed too to sanitise the event. To cater to the corporations wanting to exploit Queers for their money by sponsoring this corporate party and or the (bigoted?) breeders who aren’t quite comfortable with going to an event with the word “gay” attached to it? “SF Pride” sounds like an event for those people who have pride in the City and County of San Francisco, having nothing to do with Queers.

25. By falsely crediting “marriage is between a man and a woman” Obama for gay marriage (Related: Is Obama Responsible For Gay Marriage?).

26. By wearing US Flag and US military shirts (“Army” or “Navy”).

27. By becoming conservative prudes like the breeders.

28. By welcoming anti-Queer breeders and their children to San Francisco’s Castro.

29. By abandoning all activism. During the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement, the gay community was at the forefront of nearly any injustice that I can think of and leading protests against said injustice. The Gay Mecca Castro was part of this. Our metro would be packed with gay boys going to one protest or another carrying their homemade protest signs. But I remember when this all changed drastically. I went to a protest with mi amigo/my friend and after the protest we walked down Castro Street. We were mocked and verbally assaulted for our protest signs. Neither of us could believe what we were hearing from a group of young guys near 18th and Castro. We walked away from them feeling like we had just been assaulted by the far-right. It was that day and that moment that we realised how much The Castro had changed and become very conservative. This was probably around 2010 if I’m remembering correctly. It was years ago in other words and it’s only become more conservative since. If the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement were alive today, Queers would be leading the Movement against what is currently happening in Venezuela with an attempted US coup where the neocon basura in the White House claim they are not the “policeman of the world” when it comes to Syria, but when it comes to Venezuela it’s another story. Fucking hypocrites. Watch out for a “regime change” in Venezuela from The Cesspool in the phony name of “bringing democracy” when we don’t even have fucking democracy in our own country! It really saddens me to see what’s happening in Caracas. The gay community would be out in the streets protesting this injustice. But today, they only thing they’re leading is the herd of cold, lobotomised phone zombies without any verbal social skills who don’t seem to care or give a fuck about anything, with few exceptions.

If all of the above didn’t strike you as being part of the Century of Insanity with Queers completely flipping out and giving themselves a complete “reality show” type make-over, then there’s this:

30. What are straights doing in gay bars? WTF? You can’t make this shit up! I’m not aware of any gay guys going to straight bars to “pick up a chick” but considering the insane state of things, I suspect there are some doing that. I have heard about “straight-looking” lesbians going to straight bars to try to pick up females, but in The Castro we’ve seen no shortage of straight guys going to gay bars. WHY? Most of the bars in San Francisco are straight bars, so why are they going to a gay bar? Can’t gay guys have a bar to themselves where they can pick up somebody without the fear of it being a straight guy they’re approaching/interested in who might unfortunately give them “breeder attitude” as well as “why are you trying to pick me up, faggot?” and who potentially has violent tendencies towards Queer people? Maybe that’s why they’re there. Hoping to get a fight going with a gay guy. If not, why the fuck are straights guy in gay bars? Insanity.

31. And despite the desperate desire to “assimilate” with the straights, how can one be (fully) “assimilated” when one has this ludicrously long train of letters for their group which looks more like a brand name than anything else. It almost resembles some barcodes. I’m speaking of that revisionist-history Brand “LGBT” bull shit which the corporatist conformists sheeple dutifully use in lockstep. Although the official acronym is this rubbish: The official acronym is now: LGBTQQICAPF2K+. Straights are just called “straights” or “breeders.” They don’t have any long strings of letters. Why do Queers need all of these fucking letters? They don’t represent me; I use Queer or Gay. (Related: Lea DeLaria: The LGBTQIA+ acronym is divisive).

32. It certainly hasn’t helped matters that gay areas/gay meccas of major US cities have been taken over by wealthy breeders with their screaming children and fleets of baby strollers, as has been the case with at least three: Chelsea in Manhattan, West Hollywood and The Castro in San Francisco with the complicity of the greedy Real Estate Industrial Complex and all to the delight of conservatives who have long-despised gay areas of cities. (Related: Chelsea: The Death of a Gay Neighborhood, Murdered by Neo-Hetero-Homophobes). The conservatives have described gay areas of cities as being “segregated.” Oh here we go again with more, “Assimilate with the (bigoted and prejudiced) breeders” nonsense. That’s the same rubbish we heard here in San Francisco when the conservatives began sanitising The Castro. Their theme was:
“Gay people can live anywhere now.”
Related:
“Gay people can live anywhere,” except in New York City
“Gay people can live anywhere”—Brand LGBT(TM)
The Illusion That Gay People Can Live Anywhere
“Gay People Can Live Anywhere?”
“Gay People Can Live Anywhere? Gay Is Now Mainstream?”
Can gay people live anywhere today?
His shirt said, “Fuck you, homo.” (San Francisco’s Castro)
Gay guys are not equal
Do these conservative assholes not know that there are many places in the US where the breeders and probably some closet cases — such as those fucked-up-in-the-head Log Cabin Republicans — don’t want to see gay guys kissing? (Related: They didn’t like “the gay kiss.”) Ironically, these same conservative bigots/trash never whinge about the breeder “segregated” areas of cities known as (“segregated”) Chinatown or (“segregated”) Japantown or (“segregated”) Little Italy, or other ethnically “segregated” areas. In those cases, it’s “Let’s go eat some excellent Chinese food in Chinatown.” It’s only when it comes to gay areas of major cities that one hears these conservative trash say “there should be no segregation.” But of course some of these same bigots/rednecks would love to see segregation again with all-white public schools. They’re not fooling anyone here with their hypocrisy, hate, prejudices and bigotry. No, they have no problem at all with breeder/straight segregated areas of cities or towns. They only scream “segregation” when it comes to Queers having their own little area of cities and gay bars.

I think it’s accurate to say at this point that San Francisco’s Castro and Upper Market have been lost to the straights — we already know that my friend’s gym has been lost to the straights with their tough-guy/jock-bro macho acting and posing — or rather those Millennial guys who pretend to be straight (closet cases) walking around hand-in-hand or making out with a female. Yeah, some of these guys check out other guys (with big smiles) while holding her hand until she gives him a stern elbow in his ribs for looking at another guy. Clearly they have a beautiful relationship! [sarcasm intended] We often wondered why these so-called “straight” couples chose to move to one of the most expensive areas of San Francisco. So he could be in the former Gay Mecca and hook up with some of the remaining gay boys still here? Note to females with these closet case guys: You cannot control your guy’s genuine gay sexuality no matter what you do or how hard you try. You might consider coming out of denial that he’s gay. There are many gay guys with females going through the charade that their family expected them to do. And he’s likely with you because his family expects him to be with a girl. It’s part of society’s Breeder Brainwashing and he’s too insecure with himself to rebel against that and be with a guy and out of the closet. I guess his Millennial generation will have to start the Gay and Lesbian Out-of-the-Closet Movement all over again at some point. But anyway, mi amigo and I walked parts of Upper Market on a recent Saturday early evening. When we started our walk he said, “At this time of day, you won’t see any hand-holding.” He meant breeder couples walking and hand-holding. Unfortunately he was wrong. That is all that we saw no matter where we went. We didn’t see on gay couple the entire time. One straight Millennial hand-holding couple after the other walking down to The Castro. They were all him-tall/her-short (looked like father and daughter), except for one breeder couple who from a distance looked like a lesbian couple, but they were the same height and him and her. I said: It’s odd that they chose this area as opposed to North Beach, the Marina, Nob Hill, Russian Hill or any other area of San Francisco. Mi amigo said, “Yeah, especially when the housing prices are the highest in Castro/Upper Market. So they deliberately moved to this area for a reason. Was it to change it and make it entirely straight or are some of them closet cases?” Yes, that’s the same question that has come up many times. Why would they move to the most expensive area of The City with the history of being a now-former Gay Mecca? Closet case so-called “straight” guys enjoy making out with girls under Rainbow Flags I guess.

Finally, on the topic of the death of the so-called “gay community” (whatever that means) particularly here in San Francisco, I asked mi amigo how his morning was at his gym. He said the New Years Resolutioners are still there only on the weekends but quickly leaving. There was one older gay couple there. Just One. Everyone (literally) at the gym was wearing all-black, grey or white. No colour at all. Absolute conservative conformity. Most were in solid-black. Depressed people? When he first arrived in The Castro, there was a gay couple standing at Castro and Market. But when he left the gym, the neighbourhood had completely changed to all-breeders. He watched a parade of breeders pushing baby strollers headed to The Castro to show off their babies. The Castro is interested in seeing your baby? As some of the Queers in our little local group of Queers say: “If you’ve seen one baby, you’ve pretty much seen them all.” What’s the big deal about breeding? Mosquitoes can breed! He saw a total of about 10 babies, mostly in baby strollers but a few babies being worn in the incorrect facing-out position which is not good for the child as that article explains. (Idiot parents, who apparently don’t do any research while on that phone they’re addicted to).

I’ve written about the following phenomenon before, but in The Castro (and it’s still true). Of the few remaining Queers still here, generally speaking they appear in public at a different time than the breeders. As if the Queers are on one schedule for being out and about and the breeders are on another as was the case the other night when we were in The Castro. It was mostly Queer and gay boy couples of the people walking about. Very few breeders. But if you’re in The Castro in the early mornings especially on weekends, it’s Breeder’s Central. So I remarked to mi amigo how the two different shifts for breeders versus Queers seems to still be in effect, and that’s when it can on occasion feel more like the Old City of the former Gay Mecca, to some degree. But still, considering all that, to our little local group of Queers, most of us say that it seems that most Queers are back in the closet today and what I’ve written here applies, and some of them contributed to the list above.

And because the “gay community” is dead in the US, very few care or have the ability to care about any of this. They are “like whatever.” Yawn. The conservatives love what has happened; they’ve wanted this for decades. They’ve often said, “the gay community needs to grow up.” That was code language for: The “gay community” needs to become conservative. And that’s what has happened regardless of the political party affiliation one has been brainwashed with. The conservatives will tell me, “You’re living in the past.” Well, anyone who knows me well knows that I very much live in the present while remembering the past so as to not repeat some of the bad things from the past, which I have indeed seen happen since the Decree for “Assimilation with the straights” was issued back in 2015.

And now, if you would like to add to this list, during the commenting period you can do so in the comments, por favor/please. Gracias. Chau.—el barrio rosa

Related:

Part 2, “It already feels like we’re back where we started (circa 1970s)” is at this link

Gay guys are not equal

Gay guys are real men

Sexual Freedom and Revolution

Why do females marry gay guys?

The gay Jock Bros who reject gay guys

Gay guys self-induced conversion therapy

Going Backwards: More Gay Guys Getting Married To Females (This is what The Movement worked decades for, is it?)

Change it back to Gay Freedom Day

Prominent US ‘gay conversion therapist’ David Matheson divorces wife and comes out as gay

Why some gay men should worry more about their maturity than their masculinity

Let’s steal Venezuela’s oil in the name of “freedom”

Update (1 de febrero de 2019): (A venting update): I’m not going to write updates every time something happens on this story. I just feel the need to vent about this. Upon reflection, maybe I should turn my television to another channel. Maybe a low-stress shopping network, although that’s where I see closet cases, and they stress me out. Anyway, Juan Guaidó reminds me of the typical Millennial. Stuck on himself and arrogant. He’s now saying that the only talks he’s interested in are talks about the transfer of power from Maduro to himself, just because he’s proclaimed himself to be the new presidente. How fucking arrogant! I wrote in the article that he’s playing the Religion Card. He’s now playing the Family-Man Card. That and the Religion Card always work. Yes, he’s been walking around with his niña/daughter lately. Wearing her on his hip to show her off to show that he can breed. I don’t see that wife of his walking with him, although I saw her — at first I thought it was a child standing next to him; one of his devoted disciples — when he was speaking and she was dutifully standing next to him nodding her head in agreement with his every word on cue. I do agree with mi amigo/my friend who earlier said that Juan is “as Queer as they come.” I had only seen images of him before put in professionally-posed sexy positions. A little on the “provocative” side. But after hearing him speak and watching him, another closet case with a wife and daughter? There are thousands more just like like that. Mi amigo asked: How did he get thousands and thousands of people to support him in just days? I said: Because of his “good looks” and because he’s young, because nobody can possibly know what he’s all about in such a short period of time. Is he figuring himself out as he goes along? This also reminds me of Obama all over again. The latest messiah figure. The saviour. According to Juan and the US Imperialist liars, they are all saying that Venezuela will be better off if US oil corporations come in and take steal Venezuela’s oil. Let’s look at some examples of that from the past: the mess in Iraq and the mess in Afghanistan. (Related: Opinion: Western intervention in Afghanistan is a failure). That worked so well in both countries, didn’t it? [sarcasm intended]. Chau.—el barrio rosa

Update (31 January 2019): After posting this article, I realised there’s very little interest in this topic online. Nobody seems to care, and that’s how situations like this become more the “norm.” It’s quite a different time than when much of the world would have cared about this. Today? They just yawn and say, “Yeah, but Maduro is a bad guy.” But that’s not the point, idiot. A precedent is being set here, in part, with one country stealing another country’s oil right in front of their eyes with most of the world going along with it. Hello, is anyone home? Are you in there? I suspect if Juan Guaidó were not a 35-year old, good-looking model type and was instead a rather ugly old man, this would not be happening and the world would not be bowing to him as they are.

The insane international bully and his oil coup with Venezuela, with most of the world going along with it. Insanity. I guess they in the orange despot’s regime have to take on a small country that they can beat (that’s what bullies do) — guaranteeing them a second term one way or the other in 2020 — as opposed to taking on Russia or China.

Hola a todos. Did you know that Venezuela has the largest oil reserves in the world? Wait for the map to load, por favor/please. Totaling 297 billion barrels as of 2014.

“Stand with the forces of freedom” is the orange despot’s latest marketing propaganda for this oil coup with Venezuela. The forces of freedom? So dishonest, but so typical. Genuine freedom does not have forces. Genuine freedom is without forces. One cannot force freedom. That’s an oxymoron. Do these trash never think anything through? They’re clearly not the brightest people.

Freedom: Generally, is having an ability to act or change without constraint. A thing is “free” if it can change its state easily and is not constrained in its present state.

I guess “bringing democracy” got old. Well, it has been used for some time even though “bringing democracy” was all war-marketing bull shit. Or this repugnant regime refused to use that because that’s what Obama and Bush used for stealing the natural resources of other sovereign nations. And this regime is trying to erase Obama’s legacy from the history books. (I was no Obama supporter).

But with The Cesspool/the US, their style of “freedom” amounts to freeing up Venezuela’s vast oil reserves for the control of the US Empire. These corrupt trash pretend to be Christians yet they ignore, “Thou Shalt Not Steal” (one of the Ten Commandments) in that bible they pretend to believe in. And as usual around the world, that’s what this is about. Stealing another sovereign nation’s natural resources per the neocon’s PNAC agenda of US Empire building and world domination.

It’s odd that the orange despot is going against Mother Russia, as they oppose this coup, and they call it what it is.

I read this quote: White House warns of “significant response” to any threats against US diplomats or opposition leader. (B*lton) End Quote.

Presidente Maduro’s response should be: Go fuck yourselves, basura. You’re all like a bunch of sick subhumans acting like children in the sandbox. The toddlers in the White House, in adult bodies.

I would like to remind readers that it was less than a month ago as of this writing that the orange despot said that — referring to Syria — the US would not be the “policeman” of the world. Weeks later, and that’s exactly what the hypocrite is doing in Venezuela.

From what I can tell, as expected, the “Democrats” in the House and Senate are either remaining silent or going along with this oil coup.

The orange despot told the world to “pick a side,” while they have chosen the far-right side with some 35-year old guy, Juan Guaidó (no one is pronouncing his name correctly except the español language networks) — who looks more like a model; is that part of his attraction? — who self-proclaimed himself “el presidente.” Huh? It works like that does it in the Century of Insanity? All that anyone has to do is to declare, “I’m now the president” and the world falls in line. And most have. Boy, I sure hope that works here in the US some day and soon. So using this scenario, all someone has to do in the US is to declare him/herself the president and the world should fall in line including the EU. Mi amigo saw Juan Guaidó on television and said, “He’s as Queer as it gets.” I said: Well he has a wife and child, as one would expect, from a suspected closet case?

Like nearly all politicians, Juan Guaidó is already playing the religion card. I saw him attending a Mass and getting on the kneeler for prayer. Oh give it a rest! But the sheeple will eat it up. “Oh, he’s such a good Christian.” Just like the orange despot whose church is usually a golf course on Sundays, went to WNC for Christmas Eve Mass.

Fortunately, the military in Venezuela is on the side of presidente Nicolás Maduro at this time.

When is someone going to do that here in The Cesspool/the US to force a coup here and force the current political trash out? And to watch the EU go along with this in Venezuela is a “WTF?” moment. Would the EU approve of things working this way in their countries? I don’t think so. With someone saying, “I’m now the Chancellor of Deutschland and that’s that.” And why is Angela Merkel going along with this rubbish? Astounding. Whatever happened to legitimate and fair elections? That’s all a charade and we all know that. Putin is having none of it and has called it what it is: A coup. China opposes it and tells the US to stay out of Venezuela’s business. Yeah right. Then you have that closet case P*mpeo daily bullying and making threats to Nicolás Maduro and Venezuela. That’s all these despicable trash en la casa blanca know how to do is to bully and threaten people with this “don’t test our resolve” arrogance while they pretend to be a “Christian,” and living their pathetic and corrupt lives just like Jesus, correct?

This oil coup is about stealing another nation’s natural resources as outlined in the neocon’s Project For The New American Century (PNAC) document, which also on page 51 speaks about needing a “new Pearl Harbour” which we had known as the Inside Job of 911 to galvanise the public in favour of (permanent) war, or words to that effect.

I agree with Venezuela’s International Minister Jorge Arreaza who referred to a US news article at the UN Security Council as he told the UN his country won’t hold elections within eight days. He essentially said who do you think you are telling a sovereign nation what to do? It’s almost childlike. Exactamente.

“Nobody is going to give us deadlines or tell us if there are elections or not,” the foreign minister added.

‘How is it that you can issue an ultimatum to a sovereign government?’ he asked.

This is why I’ve thought for years that any politician particularly at the federal level should be required to undergo thorough independent non-partisan psychological testing to make sure a candidate has worked through their childhood “let’s play war” mentality and have matured to adulthood despite their chronological age. These scum are sick like that deranged-looking B*lton piece of trash. Have you looked at his face, if you can bare to? His sole reason for living seems to be to watch (non-white) people die. He is one sick fuck. That septic piece belongs in a mental institution not making powerful decisions in government. But we have so many septic, insane people just like him — the scum of the Earth — in all positions of government and some wonder why we are in the dismal state that we are?

Teatro Teresa Carreno (Concert Hall in Caracas)
556 best Opera House & Concert Hall images on Pinterest | Concert hall, Theatres and Opera

I can’t imagine any sane nation contemplating military action no, call it what it is: a terrorist attack on Venezuela (especially Caracas) by the US. That would be like attacking a major US city and if any nation attacked the US, that would be called a terrorist attack on the US.

Unfortunately, I’ve not been to Caracas but I know they have a beautiful Concert Hall, a very modern Metro system (subway) which rivals some metro systems here in the US, they have the internationally-renowned Orquesta Sinfónica Simón Bolívar (Simón Bolívar Symphony Orchestra), named after the Venezuelan national hero Simón Bolívar. This Orchestra is the apex of the nation’s system of youth orchestras. We have nothing like this in the US of Insanity. They have performed all over the world. I’ve been wondering about their superb Orchestra during these times. And sadly, they’re in trouble having lost almost half of their musicians in the past 6 months (as of 2018) who have had to leave. As a musician, I can’t tell you in words how that makes me feel. I can’t think about it for more than a few moments because it brings tears to my eyes.

Here’s one of the stations of the Caracas Metro:
Cerradas 12 estaciones del Metro de Caracas este miércoles - DiarioRepublica.com - Información ...

They (Orquesta Sinfónica Simón Bolívar) were invited to perform Mahler’s Symphony No. 2 (“The Resurrection”) for the BBC Proms awhile back. You can watch that performance below. Unfortunately, the screaming, wobbling-vibrato soloists, as usual, ruined it for me:

BBC Proms featuring Orquesta Sinfónica Simón Bolívar from Caracas, conducted by Gustavo Dudamel:

National Youth Choir of Great Britain
Simón Bolívar Symphony Orchestra of Venezuela
Gustavo Dudamel, conductor (up until recently he was the orchestral conductor)
The vocal soloists screamers with their wobbling vibrato shall remain nameless here.
Performed in the Royal Albert Hall for the BBC Proms 2011

Mi amigo and I watched the choral section of this performance the other night. After it was over he said, “I associate screaming with the Proms. I’m not sure why that is.” I said: It’s because I choose the music that we watch and they’re usually choral performances where they unfortunately drag in operatic screamers to scream and wobble through the solo passages. They refuse to sing with a lovely straight tone like the superb Chorus is singing. Maybe that’s because they can’t because they can’t sing on pitch or have other vocal problems that prevent them from singing beautifully rather than screaming. At the choral climax in this performance you’ll hear the soprano screamer overpower the entire Chorus on that high B Flat. She seems to live under the illusion that it’s all about her when really it’s all about the Chorus and Orchestra. They are the stars. Not the fucking screamers. Mi amigo and I are so sick of screamers. And wannabe-musicians like these are dragged into nearly every symphonic choral performance to scream and wobble. And in this performance, these two screamers seem to have brought in some acting as well as if they think it’s opera.

Someone usually asks if I performed the pieces I talk about. I never performed “The Resurrection,” although one of the Orchestra Choruses I sang with did, but not when I sang with them. The superb University of Maryland Chorus had quite the run of the Mahler in the Kennedy Center Concert Hall with the National Symphony Orchestra and conductor Antal Doráti. That, as well as the Verdi Requiem and of course their performances over the years of Beethoven’s Ninth, which they performed over 38 times with (inter-)national orchestras. Someone may be asking: “Did the University of Maryland Chorus do everything? It sounds like it.” Well yes sort of. They were in demand. But both Norman Scribner’s Choral Arts Society of Washington and Robert Shafer’s Oratorio Society of Washington had engagements as well with the NSO and (inter)national orchestras, but The Maryland Chorus was the dominate Chorus chosen and had quite a legacy under Antal Doráti. I remember thinking that they were the “Official Chorus of the NSO” in those days, even though they weren’t officially. He chose them as often as possible as they were his favourite Orchestra Chorus.

By the way, regarding the oil coup in Venezuela, someone e-mailed me asking “where is the anti-war movement?” I’ll answer that here. It’s dead. I remember when millions were in the streets worldwide — including myself — during the Bush years protesting illegal wars (Afghanistan and Iraq)? I sense that few care about the oil coup taking place in Venezuela.

The anti-war movement — mostly consisted of Democrats — died during the Obama years because the thinking was that “We can’t criticise our own team and Mr Nobel Peace Prize Obama with that D behind his name even though his war policies are an expansion of the imperialistic policies we protested under illegitimate George W Bush when we were in the streets.” I’ve learned over the years that Democrats are some of the biggest hypocrites one will find anywhere due to their partisan brainwashing. During Obama’s regime, I had wondered if the anti-war movement would start up again when a Republican was in the White House, but no, it’s been dead too long. Most people in the US would rather play on their phones instead. By the way, I see very few phones or phone-addicted zombies during the Yellow Vest Protests in France, Paris in particular.

5,000 US troops being sent to Colombia? And B*lton has admitted that their planned terrorist attack on Venezuela has nothing to do with the well-being of los venezolanos, but rather about oil. Of course it’s about oil. That’s the US way. To steal whatever The Cesspool doesn’t have.

So will there be anything left of the lives of millions of los venezolanos, their Concert Hall, their splendid youth Orchestra, their Metro system and Metrobus system and their infrastructure when these despicable trash from The Cesspool are done with Venezuela? These people are below the scum of the Earth.

Venezuela is no threat to the US or any other country. Venezuela already has a president in Maduro whether you agree with him or not. It is not the job of the US to tell other sovereign nations what to do. Some are wondering: When is someone going to take the exceedingly arrogant and bullying US down a notch or two? Long over due. Chau.—el barrio rosa

Related:

US’s Bolton appears to threaten Venezuela with: ’5,000 troops to Colombia’
US National Security Advisor John Bolton has stirred speculation after observers noticed “5,000 troops to Colombia” scrawled on his notepad. Accidental or not, it sends a signal to Venezuela’s leadership.

What do I think about the transgender ban in the US Military?

Hola a todos. Several people e-mailed me asking that question after the US Supreme Court upheld the orange despot’s transgender ban by a 5-4 vote. Queers/Trans individuals should have the same full rights as everyone else. Isn’t that a given? But it is beyond me why any Queer person (which includes trans) wants anything to do with or be in the US Military Industrial Complex Killing Machine and especially under this despicable orange-despot regime. WTF is wrong with some Queers? Insanity. You don’t have to be like the breeders in every fucking way. Many if not most Queers have carried that ridiculous order to “Assimilate with the straights/breeders” to the extreme, completely losing themselves and who they are as people. Stop it, damn it! Queers enjoy killing other Queers now, do they? Is that more of that “Assimilating with the straights” dogma? (Related: Why do Queers want to kill other Queers ?) Or has that not occurred to anybody? Allow me to enlighten you: When one is in the barbaric US Military Industrial Complex Killing Machine and fires a gun at someone, you’re not necessarily killing a breeder. You could be killing or injuring another Queer person that you could instead be making love with if you two hit it off? Ever thought of that? “Make Love, Not War.” I hope you get my point. We are told that Queers make up roughly 10% of the worldwide population. That’s laughable. We all know it’s far more than that. I think it’s far higher than that because many guys — who are perceived to be straight because they are married to females with children — are closet cases. The person you’re killing or harming may be Queer, not a breeder. Ever thought of that? No, I suspect you haven’t (excluding my regular readers). So it is beyond me why trans people want anything to do with the barbaric MIC Killing Machine. Why would a trans person want to be part of that vile barbarism? I’m well aware that after the order was given to “Assimilate with the breeders” following gay marriage becoming legal here in The Cesspool/the US, that most Queers went insane for wanting to be just like the breeders including being all “Rah, Rah US military” for militarism especially when their messiah Mr Nobel Peace Prize Obama was in office with his 11-12 wars (I’m sorry I lost count) that he left office with. (Related: Obama and the Transgender Activist). I watched the so-called “gay community” (whatever that means) flip out and become the opposite of who and what they were originally. So, I hope this answers the question as to how I feel about the trans ban in the MIC. As far as I’m concerned it’s a good thing. It’s too bad it doesn’t ban all Queers. After all, we Queers don’t really need to go kill anybody whether they’re straight or gay nor do we need to be involved in wars based on lies. Aren’t we better than that? We were better than that during the original Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement and before that ludicrous order to “Assimilate with the straights” was given. We were not interested in killing people at all. We were about peace and social justice. We were not about militarism or US nationalism or wearing tacky US flag shirts or military shirts (with “Army” and “Navy” written on the front) as I occasionally see some Queers wearing trying to be all “macho.”

And on another Queer-related topic, marriage equality:

Could the orange despot overturn marriage equality?
“D*nald Tr*mp had said he would “strongly consider” overturning the Supreme Court’s June 2015 decision to give same-sex couples the right to marry.”

Is there anyone reading this who thinks this can’t happen? Don’t be surprised if and when it does. It wouldn’t surprise me in the least if he were to do that. I’ve been expecting it. One does remember that vehemently anti-Queer P*nce is in the office of “vice president,” correct? And what would be the response from the now-dead so-called “gay community” (whatever that means) in the US of Insanity? Continued silence? Too busy on their phones? Chau.—el barrio rosa

Related:

Gay Wedding Ring Deception

Transgender And In The US Military?

Yellow Vest Protesters complete tenth consecutive weekend of protests

“The Price of Freedom is eternal Vigilance.”

Hola a todos. Bonjour. The Yellow Vest Movement protesters in France just completed their tenth consecutive Samedi/Saturday protest in Paris and in cities throughout France. It’s been raining every Saturday in Paris and they’re out there usually without umbrellas. The rain and cold temperatures do not stop them. They are vigilant. These are people who have given up their Saturday and Dimanche/Sunday in some cases for ten consecutive weeks as of this writing.

Comparing France to the US: You can’t get people here in The Cesspool/US of Insanity to protest even in good weather. And when they do so, it’s only a flash-in-the-pan. Purely symbolic. Which reminds me of the recent Women’s March in various cities. Well, like most “protests” the Women’s March is mostly symbolic. State-sanctioned charades with Establishment politicians speaking at their events. These marches don’t accomplish anything in the big scheme of things. It’s just a feel-good time for mostly partisan-brainwashed women and some guys to get together on a Saturday. Aren’t most of the participants of the women’s marches aligned with the “Democratic” Party Cult (as opposed to the Republican Party Cult)? I think so. I saw one guy at the Women’s March wearing a “Resist” t-shirt. It’s going to take a whole lot more than “resist” to change anything here in The Cesspool. What really needs to happen here — read between the lines — is not going to happen because USians are too fucking lame, to tell it like it is. Vigilant protests — going on eleven consecutive weeks — like the YVM in France would disturb their comfort level and phone addiction here. Can’t have that!

Contrast these flash-in-the-pan US “protests” or demonstrations to the Yellow Vest Protesters throughout France. They are vigilant. They’re not flash-in-the-pan like these women’s marches and others. And the Yellow Vest protesters have accomplished some things. French president Emmanuel Macron and their Prime Minister have made some concessions to them, but the Yellow Vest protesters don’t consider it sufficient enough. They say they want the full baguette, not just crumbs. So the Yellow Vest Movement continues on.

When was the last time that a peaceful protest accomplished anything? I can’t think of any. I was in the streets peacefully protesting many things for decades. In hindsight, everything that I peacefully protested went on as planned, including illegal wars. None of these protests in the US — violent or non-violent — seem to have changed a thing. They were/are purely symbolic.

What caused the French government to make some concessions to the YVMovement? The violence, particularly in the wealthy Avenue des Champs-Élysées area, and the vigilance of the YVMovement. The French government understood that the Movement was not going away.

In other words, don’t expect any positive changes of substance to be made by having one lame or annual polite, “cakewalk” so-called “protest” or “demonstration” with genuflecting to the Establishment state-sanctioned charade as seen here in the US of Insanity to accomplish a thing. The only thing that some governments seem to react to with some substantive positive changes is violence after weeks of vigilance on the part of the protesters. During the YVMovement, I’ve heard it said by some of the French public, “Our police are professionals unlike the thugs in the States.” Please correct me if I’m wrong, but I’m not aware of any police brutality in Paris — like what one sees in The Cesspool — that has taken place in France during the Movement to the level that would happen here in The Cesspool. I do know that some of the YVM protesters have been roughed-up by the police but I don’t know to what extreme that has occurred. I did read that four of the YVM protesters have suffered serious eye injuries in conflicts with the police.

From my understanding, the French government is now requiring the Yellow Vests to have permits/approval for their demonstrations. This was not the case when the Movement started. It sounds like the Macron government is following the US Model for “protests.” That makes a protest a state-sanctioned charade. A farce. If one needs approval (with a permit) from the Establishment for a protest, then it’s not a protest. Period. Before this was announced, the Yellow Vest Movement just got out there and protested. They didn’t ask permission from the Macron government. I’m not sure if they’re asking permission now or not. Some of the women of the Yellow Vests have been having their own protests on some Sundays, in addition to the major Saturday protest. One of the YVM women said on camera, “You see the YVM men and the violence. We women want to show that one can have a peaceful protest with a message.” I’d love to ask her: And when was the last time a peaceful protest accomplished anything and was anything more than purely symbolic? I’d also like to remind her that she should have added the word “some” in reference to the men and the violence, because the overwhelming majority of men of the YVM have not been violent. Also, most violence is often caused by the police or their infiltrators who purposefully cause violence to take the power out of the Movement and try to snuff it out. Au revoir/Chau.—el barrio rosa

Related:

The “Yellow Vest” Protesters “burned the City down?”

Do Protests Matter?

Gay Wedding Ring Deception

Hola a todos. Gay marriage in the US is relatively new historically speaking. It’s so new in our breeder-brainwashed heteronormative US society where we are bombarded with images of “him and her” 24/7 for most people to remember or think that a guy can be married to another guy (or a female can be married to another female) when they see a wedding ring on his (or her in the case of a lesbian) left hand fourth finger. The left hand fourth finger is the finger that breeders wear their wedding rings on. Someone who does not know the two gay guys (the gay couple) will likely assume without thinking that they are two straight/breeders guys hanging out together when they see their left hand fourth finger wedding rings. That image of a wedding ring on the left hand fourth finger signifying that “a man and a woman” are married has been cemented in people’s mind for generations. So I must ask: why are Queers/Gay couples in the US wearing their wedding ring on their left hand fourth finger if they’re not trying to deceive people into thinking they are straight/breeders? I thought it was common knowledge that Queers wore their wedding rings on their right hand fourth finger as they do throughout Europe.

The custom/tradition of Queers wearing their wedding ring on their right-hand fourth finger — whether legally married or not — goes back to at least 1983-85 in Europe. “We’re married as far as we’re concerned whether the country we live in here in Europe allows same-sex marriage or not” seemed to have been the thinking before countries allowed marriage equality. Examples of this can be seen in a performance of the Brahms Piano Concerto No. 1 with pianist Krystian Zimerman with Leonard Bernstein conducting the Wiener Philharmoniker. In that performance, some members of the Orchestra (one of the clarinetists, for example) as well as Krystian are wearing a right-hand wedding ring. This custom has continued in the EU after countries — such as Deutschland/Germany — have legalised gay marriage, as can be seen by observing the right-hand of many Queer orchestral players, especially members of one of my favourites, hr-Sinfonieorchester/the superb Frankfurt Radio Symphony Orchestra. (They have a gorgeous string section).

From my observations, unlike in the US, there seems to be a well-represented alive and well Queer Community in the European Union (EU). And in the EU, Queers seem to be much more comfortable with themselves and their Queer sexuality than many if not most corporate-conformist Queers over here in the US of Insanity, having been brainwashed with “Breeder Superiority.” For example, in the EU, I see so many musicians in their major orchestras throughout Europe who are Queer — gay guys and lesbians — wearing their wedding rings on their right hand fourth finger. The same for some Queer news reporters. I’ve read that they wear their wedding ring on their right hand fourth finger (what I call “the Queer finger”) because they don’t want to be confused with or mistaken for a breeder. Good for them! At least they get it! At least they haven’t given themselves a heteronormative makeover to emulate, be as much like and model themselves after the dysfunctional breeders — with their over 50% divorce rate — as Queers in the US of Insanity have done.

Then you come over here to The Cesspool/the US — only if you have to! — and many heteronormative corporatist Queers in the US of Insanity have sanitised, tried to disguise and hide their gay marriage, and really, have tried to hide gay anything! Loco./Crazy. Why have they done that? To be like the breeders following the order to “Assimilate with the straights” after gay marriage became legal in the US of Insanity. Is there anything left that these corporate-conformist heteronormative Queers haven’t sanitised to be like the breeders? Sigh./Ugh. What fucked up in the head conformist people.

Mi amigo/My friend told me the other day that he’s seeing more and more left hand wedding rings on guy’s hands at his gym. I asked: Are they straight or Queer guys? He said and I quote: “How do you know? How can you tell these days who is straight and who is gay even with the best gaydar in many cases? They’re mostly these new hard-assed macho jock residents. I saw one of the guys from my former (gay) gym and he’s now wearing a wedding ring on his left hand fourth finger. Is he married to a female or a guy? Who knows?”

I have a question for the corporate-conformist heteronormative gay couples in the US of Insanity that this article applies to: How much more do you plan to do to sanitise yourselves into looking like and being like the breeders/straights as you have done since gay marriage became legal in the US of Insanity?

And sanitising one’s gay marriage and oneself of any Queer symbols is what the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement fought for and worked for over decades? To be exactly like the breeders is what the Movement fought for over decades? I wasn’t aware of that. It’s not what I and the Queers I know worked for.

Insanity.

Unfortunately, the Movement got hijacked at some point by heteronormative corporatist conformists because I had no idea that most Queers wanted to be an exact replica of breeders. That’s news to me and I never heard anyone say that during the days of the Movement. I had no idea that was the goal of the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement which is why some of us are having trouble understanding the Queers in the US that this article is intended for. You seem to have fucking flipped-out since gay marriage became legal here in The Cesspool/the US of Insanity/los Estados Unidos. Has everyone gone insane?

Since gay marriage became legal in the US, you’ve sanitised yourselves to extreme of any Queer symbols as if ashamed of them and as if there’s something wrong with them.

Some of you have gone to such extreme measures to sanitise your gay marriage by pretending you’re married to the opposite gender by wearing your wedding rings on the “breeder finger” (the left hand fourth finger), again, which is the same finger that breeders/straights wear their wedding rings on. Loco./Crazy.

Why are you doing that? That’s gay wedding ring deception. When I see that, I see someone who is not fully comfortable with their gay sexuality. Maybe some psychotherapy would help? But it’s probably too late for that since you’ve already been brainwashed with Breeder Superiority and Breeder Brainwashing. Are you trying to deceive people into thinking you’re a breeder especially when you’re not with your partner? Why would you do that?

To those for whom this article is directed, how do you expect for someone who does not know you to know or assume that you’re gay/Queer when they see that wedding ring on your “breeder finger?” Or is that your intent? To deceive? To lie about yourself? Or have none of you thought of this? Are you trying to deceive people into thinking you’re straight/a breeder with your gay wedding ring deception?

Queers who are comfortable with themselves and their sexuality wear their wedding rings on their (what I call) “Queer finger” which is the right hand fourth finger as they do throughout Europe. Why do the Queers in the US of Insanity feel they must be different than their European counterparts?

Or are you so delusional and live under the illusion that your gay relationship is no different than that of the breeders. Well it might not be any different to you, but I can tell you it most assuredly is different to the breeders or many of them who don’t even like seeing two gay guys kissing. Are you not aware of that? Depending upon where you live, some of the breeders might see your gay marriage as no different than their (dysfunctional) straight marriage. But if you live around Jacksonville Florida, they don’t want to see your Queer relationship. Read: They didn’t like “the gay kiss” about a television station in Jacksonville Florida that was bombarded with complaints from viewers in December 2018 after the station showed two gay guys kissing on their newscast.

This also shatters that lie that the anti-gay conservative trash like to spew about, “Gay people can live anywhere,” which of course is rubbish. The reason conservatives say that is because they have never liked gay meccas, they want to kick out “those faggots” and make these areas straight and “normal” again. I heard the conservative merchant trash around The Castro — the then-owner of Café Fl*re, for example — spew that lie about “Gay people can live anywhere” as he and others were pushing to sanitise The Castro for the breeders and their baby strollers who were moving in.

Note to idiot conservatives (that’s one-in-the-same isn’t it?): Gay people can’t “live anywhere” even in the closet you bigots for fear of their safety. And conservatives are the ones who gay-bash and engage in violence towards Queers (especially trans individuals), so of course conservatives would hold that bigoted view. Los Pendejos.

It wasn’t that long ago that the breeders complained about Queers “shoving your Queer sexuality in our breeder faces.” Oh their hypocrisy. Clearly it’s fine when the breeders “shove their breeder sexuality in our Queer faces” like they enjoy doing in San Francisco’s Castro with their left hand fourth finger wedding rings, their make-out sessions and their family pictures of him and her and the kids on the desk and bookshelf at work to let everyone know they’re a breeder. Their blatant hypocrisy and homophobia is noted.

As a Queer person, are you comfortable with your gay wedding ring deception? If it were reversed, I suspect that most breeders would not want to be confused with or mistaken for a Queer person. So why would you want to be mistaken for or confused with a breeder?

Is there some gay shame within you where you’re thinking, “But breeders are normal and gays aren’t?” Again, you might want to believe that your relationship/marriage is no different than that of the breeders. It shouldn’t be any different, but reality is that it is and especially for gay guys: Related: Gay guys are not equal.

One well-known example of gay wedding ring deception is heteronormative E**en. Ugh. Isn’t she considered one of the darlings/gods of the now-dead “gay community?” I think so. I have to admit I wouldn’t walk across a small room to see her if she were on the other side. In fact, I’d probably leave the room. I liked her when she first started out in her “career,” but she’s not the same person she was then. I think wealth and celebrity-status changed her. Nearly every time I go on U-toob, for some reason there’s an image that’s shoved in my face of her sitting on her show set. Even though I don’t watch her show, the image shown for E**en — who is a millionaire worth at least $87.5M USD as of 07.18. She gets that much for acting stupid, silly and making other stupid people laugh? — shows her sitting on her sanitised corporate set in her white chair looking like Ms Corporate Conservative in her drab dark (usually black or grey) conservative suit complete with turtleneck. What happened to her? She looks corporate and conservative. There’s nothing “rad(ical)” about E**en from what I see. I think E**en runs from “rad.” Isn’t she very pro-Establishment as a millionaire corporatist? That’s what wealth can do to many people. She sanitised herself like the majority of the now-dead “gay community” have done. Does she pretend to be a “liberal” or “progressive” while supporting the right-wing corrupt corporate “Democratic” Party Cult? She’s another brainwashed partisan, I do know that otherwise she wouldn’t be an Obamabot who worships and glories the celebrity Obamas. I saw an image of E**en and celebrity Michelle doing a little dance together on her set to entertain the sheeple. (roll eyes) Such substantive material. What a waste of air time! I guess the high-pitched, shrill screaming girls in her studio audience — does she still have them; probably a new group by now? — were hysterical over that little dance. If only they could get that excited over something that really mattered of importance in most people’s lives! But that’s not what shallow and superficial people do. Being an Obamabot, I presume that E**en approved of Obama greatly expanding on the right-wing neocon policies of the illegitimate Bush regime and the number of innocent people Obama’s policies killed. Is E**len aware of any of that? And none of these White House residents seem to come with any semblance of a conscience, no matter how many times they tear on camera for the benefit of the gullible partisan sheeple who fall for such stunts.

Like many misinformed Queers, does E**en think that her messiah Obama is responsible for gay marriage? He’s not. Obama had no idea how his two nominees to the US Supreme Court would vote on anything while sitting on the court. In fact, his nominee Ellen Kagan later voted in favour of the anti-gay Colorado cake baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple. How fast one forgets all of that.

Does E**en still call herself a lesbian or does Ms Corporate Conservative with her revisionist history corporate “Brand LGBT” nonsense use the “identify” word which gives the impression that one can change one’s sexuality by how one “identifies.” As in, “I identify as a lesbian (today).” How will you “identify” tomorrow? (roll eyes) Groan.

The only time I watched her show (or a clip of it rather) in recent years was when she had a guest on from the español language network Univisión. Of course she mispronounced “Univisión” and though it was funny that she mangled it. That’s often the way shallow USians are when it comes to pronouncing words from other international languages, unfortunately. Her guest from Univisión had to pronounce the network name correctly for Ms Willfully-Ignorant E**en. A prepared show host and mature comedian wouldn’t find it funny to disrespect other languages and would have rehearsed it before the show so as not to look like an español-illiterate idiot. Then there’s E**en. Moments later, she felt the need to make some comment about how “hot” he was, which came off to me as if she were pretending to be a straight woman/a breeder. I thought: WTF is wrong with her? That’s one reason I referred to her earlier as heteronormative. I’ve not known any lesbians that I can think of who referred to a guy as “hot.”

The only reason I’m writing about this woman is because, again, heteronormative E**en also chooses gay wedding ring deception by wearing her wedding ring on her “breeder finger” as you can see in the image here (give it time to load). When she’s in public, I suppose most people might recognise E**en from television but I doubt most people would recognise her partner, so when people see one without the other, people would likely assume when seeing that wedding ring on their “breeder finger:” “Oh, she’s married to a man (now). About time. Now she’s normal.”

Another example of gay wedding ring deception is a Queer clothing designer who shall remain nameless. He’s from New York City. He’s on one of the major shopping networks. Every time I see him he’s wearing conformist all-black clothing from head-to-toe. He even has black-framed glasses and black sneakers. No black nail polish though. Guess he hasn’t thought of that yet. He seems to be obsessed with wearing Millennial-black even though he’s not a Millennial. He’s extremely conformist which perhaps speaks to some deep insecurities? He married his partner/boyfriend awhile back. I’ve seen images of the two together at their la boda/wedding. On television, he wears his rather large wedding band on his “breeder finger” (left hand fourth finger). But he’s a Queer boy, so why is he doing that? He looks like he’s trying to be heteronormative. He wants the (mostly female?) viewers to think he’s a breeder/straight. Because the viewing audience of this rather conservative network he’s on would not likely think about gay marriage when they see his wedding ring on “the breeder finger.” The audience will likely think he has a wife, which I think is what he wants them to think. Because on one occasion, a female caller told him that through his designs she could tell how much he loves women. (roll eyes. Oh good lawd, does the woman have no gaydar at all?) He told her, “Oh that’s such a nice thing for you to say” followed by some other syrupy words. He didn’t say to her, “I’m gay, I’m Queer, so no, I don’t love women. I just love their money that they spend when they buy my designs/clothes here on this network.” Well obviously he couldn’t say that on air but he could have said part of the following: “Nice of you to call and I do enjoy designing clothes for women such as yourself. You may notice that I do design clothes in various colours even though I never wear colour myself. I’m always in this drab-black get up that you see me wearing here on this set as if I’m either on my way to or coming back from a funeral.” So on television, this gay guy is essentially a closet case married to another gay guy. I wonder how his partner feels about that, or is he a closet case too? Mi amigo/My friend said: I’d love to have heard the conversation that took place between he and his partner about putting the wedding ring(s) on “the breeder finger.” What kind of brain calisthenics did they have to jump through to justify that? I said: Oh it probably went something like this: I’m putting my wedding ring on the “breeder finger” because of the fashion industry I’m in. Everyone knows that the moda/fashion industry has never had any Queer people in it at all, ever, never. So that I fit in with my conservative (anti-Queer?) female audience, I want them to think I’m a breeder/I’m straight so they will continue to buy my designs. It’s fine with me if I deceive them — to me it’s all about the money and not any integrity or self-respect as a gay guy on my part. I’m fine with deceiving them and to make them think “I love women” just like that caller told me. I’m quite comfortable with living a lie on television and anywhere else in my life where someone thinks I’m straight. Isn’t that what our Movement worked for over decades? (roll eyes)

And I should also point out that some of the show hosts on this network according to my very reliable gaydar are Queer, but they too pretend to be a breeder and talk on occasion about having a partner of the opposite gender, and about the kids. I remember feeling a bit stunned when one of the show hosts who I would have bet money on is a lesbian was talking on air about her husband. Husband? Who is she trying to fool, I asked? Her audience apparently. She too wants the audience to think she’s a breeder. Or does she call her female partner her “husband.” Even if that were the case, the audience would not know that and they would assume she’s talking about a guy.

There’s another male clothing designer representative — a closet case, as far as I’m concerned — on the same network who I’ve always thought was gay and would have bet money on it. I found a post of his while writing this article where he wrote, “Yep, I’m not gay.” That he was asked whether he’s gay is revealing. Obviously other people think he is gay too. And of course he gave the expected answer that closet cases always give. But was his version of that answer supposed to be a joke? I mean, it sounds like a double-negative. Shouldn’t that be, “No, I’m not gay.” Maybe it was a joke since it began with “Yep,….” He’s more feminine than some of the female models on the network, and has written other comments about the time he spends with his mother. Straight guys don’t usually talk about the time they spend with their mothers, do they? (No.) That’s considered to be a “momma’s boy” and a “sissy.” I showed an image of this clothing designer to mi amigo. He said, “Oh yeah, I remember him. He’s straight all right. Another closet case.”

As some of us see it, the order to “Assimilate with the straights (the breeders)” was the night the so-called “gay community” died. Fin. The End. And things have been dead ever since.

Interestingly, I read this while writing this article:

“Marriage equality was widely regarded as the last frontier for gay-rights activists.” [Source]. That’s the first time I have read that anywhere. So it wasn’t my imagination that gay marriage becoming legal was the end of the Movement when I wrote this article: What was the ultimate goal of the Gay Rights Movement?

There’s been nothing since.

These day the only thing I see people doing is seeing how many more fucking letters they can add to that ridiculous acronym, which has now grown to this length: The official acronym is now: LGBTQQICAPF2K+. Have you ever seen anything more ridiculous? It almost looks like some variant of a barcode.

Forget these letters. We’re Queer or Gay. Period. Take your pick. Or use both, as I do. Here’s the thing: I thought the conformist-corporatist Queers wanted to be like the breeders? Well, the breeders don’t have any ridiculous letters/acronyms. They’re just called straight or breeders (or heterosexuals, a word I don’t particularly like). Period. So why do Queers (still) have these long strings of letters? Related: Lea DeLaria: The LGBTQIA+ acronym is divisive.

Insanity.

As some of us see it — including our little local group of Queers here in San Francisco — the tombstone for the grave of the so-called “gay community” (whatever that means) reads: “Assimilate with the straights.” That has translated into Queers going back in the closet in many cases and or marrying their partner but in many cases unfortunately wearing their wedding ring on the “breeder finger,” another example of Queers sanitising themselves to be like the breeders.

Just as most Queers have run from our Queer radical past and have adopted more traditional, conservative, heteronormative breeder behaviour and Establishment institutions.

Marriage is one of those institutions since marriage is a very conservative heteronormative institution. It’s as if many gays and lesbians completely lost themselves and said:

“I want to be a breeder, or just like them, even though I protested breeders/straights for decades during the now-dead Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement. Just ignore my hypocrisy over those decades. I want to be a breeder now.”

Insanity, and this seems to be a mostly US phenomenon.

The tombstone on the grave of the now-dead “gay community” also tells the story about how most Queers (at least here in conformist San Francisco) have thoroughly sanitised themselves of any and all Queer symbols on their person that indicated to others that they are Queer. They removed their Rainbow Flags, their Trans Flags, their Bear Flags, their Leather Flags from their person and backpack/shoulderbag and put them back in the closet, often along with themselves in many cases. Gay guys have removed their earrings — because breeder guys don’t wear earrings — and put them in the closet. Remember bling? Bling earrings were a major fad here in The Castro among Queers guys. Almost everyone was wearing bling. But as I remember it, bling disappeared almost literally overnight after the dictate to “Assimilate with the (white) straights” was given. Those sparkly bling earrings went back in the closet (along with the Queer boy?) right after the “Assimilate with the straights” order was given. I specified “white” breeders up above because some Black and Latino/Hispano breeder guys wore bling then and still do here in 2019. I still wear mine. Also, gay guys have gone to conservative hairstyles to look like the breeder guys. Gone are the hawks and faux hawks for the most part. “Rad” and “alternative” is out. Adamant conformist is in. Conform! Obey! Wear black and grey.

Gay guys want to look like the breeder jock bros as gay guys try to be more heteronormative. Some gay guys pretend to be “bi” even though they have no interests in females. They think “bi” makes them sound more “macho” and more like the breeders. (Note: I’m not referring to the genuine bi people; I’m talking about the frauds, the liars, the fakes). Lesbians want to look like straight women as they try to be more heteronormative.

The only time one sees or hears “Out and Proud” anymore (remember that slogan?) is on that one day a year now known as Pride, Inc. Note they’ve even removed the word “Gay” from “Pride.” Even “Pride” has been sanitised by these heteronormative corporate assholes. Was that done to cater to the breeders who might be uncomfortable with the word “gay?” It’s always good to cater to the breeders, isn’t it? Like the Castro merchants have done by ruining The Castro (Related: “Queering The Castro”). Yes, even “SF Pride” (as it’s called in San Francisco) has been hijacked by corporations, by the Military Industrial Complex and ugly nationalism. (Related: The Queer Equality March began with the US National Anthem? WTF?, and Queers glorying war on Gay Freedom Day Weekend. Just more insanity in Queer’s desperate attempt to emulate the breeders. At least in San Francisco, “Pride, Inc.” has essentially become a breeder-hijacked event to party, get drunk and to make out under Rainbow Flags.

Gay guys are certainly not “Out and Proud” when they en masse describe themselves in closet case language — such as in their sex personals — by using words such as “discreet” and “down low.” What are they ashamed of that they think they must be “discreet” and “down low?” What happened to “Out and Proud?” That’s passé too. One can’t be “Out and Proud” and also “discreet” and “down low.” They are a contradiction in terms.

I’ve seen the now-dead “gay community” become more and more conservative, some wearing US flag shirts (I never saw that during The Movement), even becoming “rah, rah” for barbaric US militarism, which is the opposite of the pro-peace beliefs of the original Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement. It caused me to write this article: Why do Queers want to kill other Queers ?

If one desperately wanted to be a breeder, one would be marrying a person of the opposite gender. Well some are! You can’t make this shit up! And if one did that, I’d have to seriously question why Queers worked decades for equal rights including gay marriage when, in the end, (some) Queers were ultimately going to marry someone of the opposite gender which some have done and continue to do here in the Century of Insanity. Related: More back to the 1950s: Gay guys marrying females in droves. Sad. Insanity. Why would a Queer person marry someone of the opposite gender, unless s/he has gay shame and has gone back in the closet? Loco.

All things considered, does one now understand why I and others say that it seems that the so-called “gay community” (whatever that means now, not much) has completely fucking flipped out?! Geezus.

What one sees is mass insanity as one passes by the tombstone of the grave of the dead so-called “gay community.”

Then on television and on U-toob, so often I see Queer guys trying to deceive the viewer into thinking that they are a breeder by wearing their gay wedding ring on their left hand fourth finger (“the breeder finger.”)

I’ve said this countless times but to any first time readers:

“San Francisco has lost its soul.”

That’s a phrase I’ve heard longtime residents say in the last couple of years. And they absolutely cannot stand The Castro now. They call it: “Corporatised, Disney-fied, there’s no art or culture anymore, the people suck, nobody cares about anything anymore, it’s no longer a fun place, everybody is on their phone.” I agree with all of that. Overall, San Francisco has become a very cold (I’m not referring to the weather), snotty, lobotomised conservative City due partly to the conservative agenda of the conservatives in the so-called “gay community” of the past. This was rather shocking to me at the time because I never knew there were any conservative Queers. I had never known any. But their intent was to sanitise “The Proudly Radical Castro” for the conservative/prudish breeders and their children who were moving in here and complaining about the neighbourhood. Intelligent people don’t move to a neighbourhood they don’t like, but these assholes did with the intention of changing it to the way they wanted it with the help of conservative Queers. (Related: Sexual Freedom and Revolution). The conservatives said, “It’s time for the gay community to grow up.” Translation: It’s time for the so-called “gay community” to become conservatives like us conservative prudes. And that’s what happened, not just here in San Francisco but in other cities as well, such as: Chelsea: The Death of a Gay Neighborhood, Murdered by Neo-Hetero-Homophobes. Also, West Hollywood puts the Rainbow Flag back in the closet.

I’ve heard longtime residents say, “I avoid The Castro especially on the weekends. It makes me angry to go there. I don’t need that in my life. I don’t like walking down 17th Street to The Castro because all you see is this stream of him and hers with a baby stroller usually, watch them pause to have a make-out session, then you get to Castro and Market Streets and you’ll see what looks like a gay guy trying to be straight and making out with a woman. A couple of people told me: In some cases it is a gay guy that I’ve seen here for years and he’s gotten himself a girlfriend it looks like to be “normal” must be his thinking (gay shame). We didn’t see this before this “Assimilate with the straights” shit started.

While writing this article, mi amigo/my friend asked me to add: Today, one merely sees remnants of what used to be the gay community every now and then here in San Francisco. And even with those remnants, it’s not obvious that the person is Queer. They are back in the closet or appear to be. One usually has to guess — which is not the way it used to be — because often they too are sanitised and trying to hide their gay sexuality. He also came to me and said he just watched two guys on U-toob who were more than obviously Queer boys but both had a big gaudy wedding ring on their left hand fourth finger. He didn’t know what to make of that. He asked: Are they married to each other or are they married to another guy, or are they married to a female? If they wore their weddings rings on the “Queer finger,” we would only be asking two of those questions: 1) Are they married to each other or 2) married to another guy? Mi amigo walked away in frustration and disgust and said, “You know, I think we have to just forget about the wedding rings. Add that to the list of insanity here in the US with the deceased heteronormative gay community. Just as we try to forget about that ‘LGBT’ revisionist history nonsense that one sees used all over the internet by the conformists.

Still in the closet in 2019?

During the now-dead Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement, we worked so hard for many thing including coming out of the closet to be ourselves. So it leaves me with a deep sense of depression whenever I see a Queer boy who is obviously a closet case and doesn’t have the cojones to come out of the closet bouncing down the sidewalk holding hands with some giddy female as they head into San Francisco’s Breeder Mecca (The Castro, the former Gay Mecca). They’re going to The Castro presumably to drink, get drunk and make out under Rainbow Flags and later have straight sex, even though my reliable gaydar tells me he’s gay.

One gets the impression that The Castro is now the only place in San Francisco where breeders (or rather closet cases) come to have “straight sex.” I talked with one Queer guy in my apartment building recently about this and he said, “I don’t even go into The Castro anymore to the bars because of all the straight girls there.”

And finally, despite all this talk about being like the breeders/straights and “Assimilating with the straights” it must be pointed out that some of the perceived breeders/straights are not straight at all. They’re closet cases having been brainwashed with Breeder Brainwashing and Breeder Brainwashing: Another gay guy marries a woman. They’re Queer. They followed “The Heteronormative Family Script” meaning: “We, your family, expect you to get a girl, get married and pump out babies.” Some of these gay guys who married females finally do come out of the closet such as this gay guy who was married to a woman for years and they pumped out several children:
This Gay Mormon Man Who Got Famous For Marrying A Straight Woman Is Getting Divorced. I would hope that a guy such as this should he get married to another guy at some point will wear his wedding ring on his “Queer finger” (right hand fourth finger) rather than engage in gay wedding ring deception.

There is a tad bit of good news when it comes to gay male couples, although it’s about the UK and not the US of Insanity:

In the UK: Gay male couples least likely to divorce and break up. “Researchers have found same-sex male couples are twice as likely as not to break up as lesbians …. Women in same-sex relationships are 1.5 times as likely as heterosexual couples to have broken up. Lesbian couples ‘most likely’ to break up.”

But back over here in The Cesspool, one should expect to see even more of this gay wedding ring deception and closeted behaviour as we as a society race back to the 1940-50s, where other negative aspects of life and “battles fought” that some of us thought were long gone are indeed returning.

Is there anyone reading this who thinks this can’t happen: Could the orange despot overturn marriage equality?
“D*nald Tr*mp had said he would “strongly consider” overturning the Supreme Court’s June 2015 decision to give same-sex couples the right to marry.” Wouldn’t surprise me in the least if he were to do that. I’ve been expecting it. One does remember that vehemently anti-Queer P*nce is in the office of “vice president,” correct?

I read a headline on one site the other day. It read: “Who came out as gay in 2018?” That article shouldn’t take up too much ink. But I think they would need new server space for an article that read: “Who went back in the closet in 2018…and married females to be like the breeders?” That article would be as thick as a dictionary.

Then there was a headline about a Queer couple — who shall remain nameless — who have “a new daughter.” Again, trying to be just like the breeders by having children. Repeating myself again, I really didn’t know that being an exact replica of the breeders was the ultimate goal of our Movement. And I don’t think it was. As I said earlier, our Movement was hijacked by heteronormative corporatists. Just like lesbians hijacked our Movement with their sexist “LGBT” (it’s sexist because it’s the “ladies go first” mentality) bull shit when they didn’t do most of the work — gay guys and trans people were the main activists — so lesbians don’t deserve first place in that silly acronym.

“The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.” It’s a time-honoured saying and very true. That saying is engraved on the tombstone of the grave of the now-dead “gay community” because they failed to remain vigilant. And at the rate things are going, to some of us who are paying attention it feels like we will have to start all over again at some point. Chau.—el barrio rosa

Related:

Related: Gay Assimilation Has Backfired.

Gay guys are not equal

Gay guys are real men

Lesbians trying to look like straight women

The gay Jock Bros who reject gay guys

The Illusion That Gay People Can Live Anywhere

They didn’t like “the gay kiss.”

What was the ultimate goal of the Gay Rights Movement?

Lea DeLaria: The LGBTQIA+ acronym is divisive

The official acronym is now: LGBTQQICAPF2K+

So now it’s the LGBTQIA+ community ?

The Resistance from the “LGBT” Status Quo Sheeple

“Gay people can live anywhere”—Brand LGBT(TM)

Corporatist Brand LGBT (TM) deserve what they get

Brand LGBT(TM)

What’s With The “LGBT?”

Is it GLBTQ or LGBT?

The “Discreet” Gay Guys in New York City

The “Discreet” Gay Guys

Breeder Brainwashing: Another gay guy marries a woman

Whoever thought that being Queer was just a fad ?

“Gay Pride” and getting ready for the lady

Change it back to Gay Freedom Day

Review: The 2018 Gay Freedom Day in San Francisco

Gay Shame: A Sign of the Times

“Proud To Be Going Straight.” At Gay Pride?

Going back to the 1920s and beyond

Are gays going back in the closet?

Why are hetero couples going to gay bars?

Breeder Marriage Proposals