It’s too close to the end of his term for impeachment.

That’s what you’ll hear the corporate and imperialistic “Democratic” Party Cult celebrity politicians/the “leadership” say after the 2018 midterms s-elections.

Hola a todos. I read a headline while completing this article. The headline read: “What Democratic Control of Congress would mean for Tr*mp.” What it would mean? It would mean nothing. “Democratic” control of Congress means that the right-wing status quo would continue and that the “Democrats” would give him pretty much anything he wants, as they’ve been doing all along and just as they did for illegitimate George W Bush.

People keep forgetting or choose to live in denial that these two corporate parties are more or less the same. Their funding comes from the same sources. On the major substantive issues they are in agreement, such as being pro-war, they’re not doing anything about the current regime locking up migrant children in cages, and none of them are saying a word about our corrupt sham of an “election” system nor are they about to. The current regime is decreasing “election” accountable by eliminating various agencies that look over the voting system, part of his deregulation schemes, which the “Democrats” aren’t doing anything about either. They are basically in a silent mode. Silence = complicity and enabling.

After I wrote this article, I was barraged with a bank of partisan e-mails all saying the same thing. It was a lame copy and paste job. May I presume they were e-mails sent by brainwashed “Democratic” partisan paid trolls? I suspect so, because who else would put that much effort into something if they’re not being paid to do so? It was a (what can best be described as) before-the-US-2018-midterms “Democratic” Party Cult troll assault. They targeted me because I’ve been very critical of their political Cult in recent articles. These hypocrites used the same methods they once criticised Republican Party Cultist trolls of using. And just like their cult-party, the e-mails showed no imagination or creativity. They were trying to pick a fight with me, but that didn’t happen. I guess they enjoy wasting their time arguing with people over partisan politics which is something I don’t enjoy doing. All of the e-mails ended with the following text, with this sloppy language:

“When the Democrats take back the Congress and Senate in November, don’t you think they will impeach Tr*mp [my asterisk added] after the midterm election?”

I take it that no one reviewed that before they sent it out. I’ll make the appropriate and necessary corrections in bold font to that text:

When If the Democrats take back the Congress House and Senate, don’t you think they will impeach Tr*mp after the midterm s-election.” (Most USians adamantly choose to live in denial about our corrupt and easily-hackable sham of an “election” system in the US. They choose to deny it so that they can continue to live under the delusional and wishful-thinking notion that we’re going to “vote our way out of this disaster.” There’s absolutely no proof of that. I would remind people that it’s this voting system that got us in this disasters, so it’s not about to get us out. An 11-year-old hacked a replica of Florida’s voting system in 10 minutes).

I’ll answer their question in a moment, but first, some very remedial education for these cultists:

The Congress and Senate? Do these people also say the House and Congress?

I see they made the common mistake of referring to the: “Congress and Senate…” when they mean the House and Senate. Some remedial education: The US Congress consists of the House and Senate. The word Senate is implied or included when referring to the US Congress, so why are they saying the word “Senate” essentially twice? I hope the reader understands my point. Do they not know that the Senate is part of the Congress? Or put another way, when did the Senate become a separate and independent body from the Congress which “Congress and Senate” implies? It’s like saying “the White House and Supreme Court.” Two separate entities. These people do not even understand our system of governance and its structure? Where did these people go to school? The word they should have used was House and Senate because, again, the US Congress consists of two bodies:

House of Representatives (they’re called Representatives, as in Representative Nancy Pelosi)

Senate (they’re called Senators, as in Senator Kamala Harris).

I am so tired of this sloppy, incorrect language “Congress and Senate,” which is the same thing as saying, “the House and Senate and Senate.” Get the point? Because, again — for the thick people who show up here and there’s no shortage of them as you may have noticed — the way these stupid people wrote it it implies that the Senate is a separate body somewhere in the District of Columbia outside of the Congress. It is not. The Senate is the upper body of the US Congress. I don’t know why people use the word “Congress” when they mean to say/write the House of Representatives. Both legislative bodies make up the Congress. I would like to point out that they never say the word “Congress” when they mean the Senate. I’ve never heard anyone say (or seen anyone write): “The House and Congress.” Again, both bodies make up the Congress, stupid people. Do I need to draw you a picture? How difficult it is to say the word(s) “House (of Representatives) and Senate?” But stupid is in, and one cannot fix stupid, so I won’t bother drawing a picture. The reason I’m making a big deal about this is because all of this was well-drilled into us when I was in school. We even had a special exam on it. So in my class, we were well-educated on this. I think everyone got an “A” on it because she spent a lot of time on this topic. So when I see idiots — who should know better! — writing “Congress and Senate” that sets me off. I’m fucking sick of it. I’m sick of fucking idiots. And they often pretend to be a “progressive” or a “liberal.” And I know from experience that one is accused of “nit-picking” if one corrects someone who writes or says, “the Congress and Senate.” Because these people don’t have the maturity to respond by saying, “Oh you’re absolutely correct. My mistake, I should have said House and Senate and not Congress and Senate. Thanks for the correction.” No, one is not likely to get that mature response at all from these people. No one ever responded that way to me when I was politely correcting people on this. Instead, I was met with hostility because I was exposing the person’s perceived ignorance regarding the legislative branch of the US Oligarchy.

One of my commenters, a former school teacher, wrote that this is one of her pet peeves too. Clearly the US education system is in deep trouble since she retired, I can tell you that! Maybe she should consider coming out of retirement.

Mi amigo/My friend says he’s seen that mistake I’m talking about repeatedly used by supposedly educated people and the corporate media. Well that doesn’t surprise me in the least. The corporate media use sloppy language all the time — and they find it funny when they mispronounce words of other world/international languages — and I guess viewers hear/read that “Congress and Senate” mistake and mindlessly repeat it themselves. Mi amigo said he also sees the sexist word “Congressmen” used when female congresswomen are being talked about. That doesn’t surprise me either. The sexist SEP Cult does the same thing.

On a related language topic, many people continue to use the sexist word “mankind” instead of humankind or peoplekind. I prefer the latter since it doesn’t contain the word “man.” The Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, spoke of peoplekind recently in one of his town hall meetings.

So now that we’ve cleared that up — yeah I’m sure, as I expect some damn fool to write “Congress and Senate” within the next minute — I’ll move on to the question asked:

“Don’t you think they will impeach Tr*mp [my asterisk added] after the midterm election [sic]?”

What drugs are these people on? No, no, no, I do not think that the fake-opposition party, the “Democratic” Party Cult, will impeach the thin-skinned, narcissistic, obnoxiously immature Orange Bully-Asshole (Orange Nazi) after the midterm s-election, even if they were to have every seat in the House and Senate. Period. That’s not what they are about. They are about corporate submission. They are about enabling and being complicit. When will people come out of their denial and realise this? I do not see impeachment happening because the “Democratic” Party Cult always has an excuse for something. They always have an excuse for not being a genuine opposition party. They enjoy helping “their friends/colleagues across the aisle” as they say. Then their gullible and damnably naïve cultists always fall for their excuses for not doing what they should do, no matter what they do, as these corrupt politicians continue to enable their employer which is the Republican Party Cult and their corporate owners.

The “Democratic” Party Cultists want so desperately to believe that their saviour “Nancy Pelosi has a plan” and that “the Democrats have a strategy, you’ll see!” Since 2000, I have heard or read that wishful-thinking drivel countless times. What delusional and naïve fucks. It’s obvious to any sane person based in reality that Pelosi’s “plan” is to continue to enable the insane, thin-skinned Orange Bully-Asshole, and for her to remain in the House of Representatives. (Let’s review class: The Congress consists of the House and Senate. Got it? Good.) And I’ve been waiting 18 years (since 2000) to see Nancy Pelosi trot out her Pelosi Glorious PlanTM that these partisan-brainwashed cultist wishful-thinking delusional fools have talked about her having for the past 18 years. Her “plan” has consistently shown her to be a Republican/White House enabler to corporate submission.

What the “Democratic” politicians will say after the midterm is the following:

“Dear Friends: Impeachment takes a long time, and grinds the government to a halt. [Ed. More than it already is?] We feel it’s too close to the end of his term for us to begin impeachment proceedings. Let’s let the voters ‘impeach him’ at the end of his 4-years” The unspoken: That is, if the voters decide to do so, by not voting for him and instead voting — on our corrupt sham of a s-election system and the same system that put him in office — for whatever piece of corrupt corporate trash we “Democrats” decide to put up our as pathetic and anemic nominee. Of course, we’ll probably put up another has-been wet doily that we found at the bottom of our “Democratic” Cult Party recycling bin where all of our corrupt politicians come from. Yes, we just keep recycling the same old trash over and over, don’t we? Cue: Attention-seeking Hillary again to have a re-run of 2016. Not that anything will be different the second time around. Or that 75-year old (as of this writing) Biden guy. These narcissistic celebrity politicos never know when to go away do they?

That’s how I see it, based on the “Democrats’” history, their behaviour and complicity-enabling of the Republican Party Cult. I should point out that it’s the exact same tactic they used with illegitimate George W Bush. Pelosi took impeachment of Bush “off the table” when he was holding residency en la casa blanca. During Bush’s second 4-year residency in the White House, the “Democrats” gave him pretty much anything he wanted because it appeared that they felt sorry for him because “his Republican party” — the one that the “Democrats” work for — lost seats.

Are they paying no attention to what this man-child (the Orange Nazi) is saying daily? Or do they silently and covertly agree with him? They must, the way they’ve been enabling him. Anyway, I can see the “Democrats” doing the same thing for the insane, thin-skinned Orange Bully-Asshole as they did for George W Bush.

There is absolutely nothing remotely “presidential” whatsoever about this beyond-obnoxious, scum-of-the-Earth piece of trash en la casa blanca/in the white house. He is a complete international embarrassment (I’m sorry you have to deal with him periodically Angela Merkel, Bundeskanzlerin – the German Chancellor, widely described as the de facto leader of the European Union, the most powerful woman in the world, and the leader of the “Free World”). He doesn’t have basic sense or any sense of maturity or a modicum of intelligence or an internal gauge for knowing the appropriate thing to say in the role as “president.” He relishes sounding stupid and proudly-ignorant, just like his scum-of-the-Earth base. Nevertheless, the “Democrats” seem quite comfortable with him and have enabled him, so why would they have any interest in impeaching someone they have enabled? That doesn’t make any sense.

Here are a few examples of their enabling for those who missed all this:

Trump impeachment vote fails overwhelmingly
Quote: Now is not the time to consider articles of impeachment,” Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi and Minority Whip Steny Hoyer said in a joint statement, shortly after Green introduced his articles of impeachment. End Quote

Democrats just handed Tr*mp more domestic surveillance powers. They should know better.

Democrats Cave, Agree To Fast Track Tr*mp’s Corporate Judges

“Republicans and Democrats like to claim that they are on opposite sides of important issues. Of course, depending on which way the wind blows, they sometimes change sides, like over support for free trade and federal deficits. Tragically, however, there is no division when it comes to militarism.” [Source]

Then, often-Republican-enabler Congresswoman Dianne Feinstein — yes she is a Congresswoman because the Senate is part of the Congress and she hangs out in the Senate with her Bachelor of Arts degree in History; how can someone be a “lawmaker” without any legal training or law degree?1 — stunned a San Francisco group of “Democratic” Party Cultists when she said that she thinks the current White House resident could be a good “president” [sic] if he changes some. Specifically, “The question is whether he can learn and change,” Feinstein said. My response: Him learn? Him change? He’s a 70+ year old narcissistic child in an adult body. It is not likely for someone of that advanced age to change at this point. He’s quite set in his ways and is unable to change. What evidence does the woman have of his ability to learn or change? Nada. Not going to happen. Period. “She also said that Tr*mp will have to “forget himself enough and have the type of empathy and direction the country needs.” Delusional. Not. Going. To. Happen. Feinstein added that, “there are things that can be done if he does not move in that direction.” Well of course there are things that can be done but you and your pathetic Republican-enabling party have no intention of doing them. One wonders: What does the current White House resident have on Feinstein and Richard Blum (her husband) to cause her to have “fallen for” him? Surprisingly, Feinstein says she plans to vote “no” on the Kavanaugh US Supreme Court nomination based on what she heard from him — including perjury — in the hearings.

Then there are the corporate politicians who have difficulty hiding their giddiness over their own celebrity status. It has clearly gone to their heads and they see themselves as some god as if they’re thinking, “My adoring fans adore me. Look at them. I know I’m pretty damn hot.” Messiah Obama comes off like that if you’ve watched him. It’s ironic that Obama recently said that the upcoming midterms is a “chance for political sanity.” I wish he would have thought of that when he was insanely greatly expanding on the right-wing neocon agenda of the illegitimate Bush/Cheney regime.

The “Politics of Fear” Card

Why do things keep moving to the right and far-right all over the world these days? Well it’s because of the Politics of Fear that’s being used all around the world, particularly the fear and hate for migrants who have fled their bombed-out cities/residential areas because of US Imperialism. It’s rare to hear anything “moved to the left” anywhere that I can think of. It’s always right-wing and conservative using the Politics of Fear or The Fear Card. I think nearly every politician uses this. Obama gave a speech to a room full of his cultist believers — everyone had a phone in hand to take a picture of their messiah even though they could get the same thing online — and he spoke of the “Politics of Fear.” He was indirectly referring to the “Politics of Fear” being used by the current resident of la casa blanca/the white house. Rather hypocritical of Obama since he used the Politics of Fear Card when he was in office. Just one example that comes to mind: Bush’s “War on Terror” propaganda — Fear, Fear, Fear, Fear — which Obama greatly expanded on. He left office with 8-9 neocon wars (I lost count, sorry, it was hard to keep up with his wars) to expand US neocon imperialism per the Project For the New American Century Agenda (PNAC). Also regarding migrants, Obama was also known as The Deporter and Chief. As you can read about here and here. The Politics of Fear Card is one of the first tactics that politicians seem to learn to use and exploit for their agenda, and it’s often used by the right-wing and far-right as was seen recently in the election in Sweden where the far-right made up all kinds of lies as part of their hate campaign against migrants that public records showed to be absolutely untrue/lies. But the far-right in particular never lets the truth get in their way if it will accomplish their rabid hateful agenda.

Meanwhile, Obama’s “Democratic” Party Cult has been enabling the insane one (see examples above) and his gang of outlaw thugs. Obama chooses to see what he wants. He chooses to not see those examples I listed above. Or has he been too busy on luxury cruises: The Obamas just took a luxurious cruise with Oprah and Bruce Springsteen on this billionaire producer’s yacht, or hanging out with Tom Hanks or billionaire Oprah or celebrities or at Martha’s Vineyard (Dahling), or when he spoke in Africa at an event commemorating the 100th anniversary of the birth of Nelson Mandela where he bragged: “I’m surprised how much money I got.” In his speech he hypocritically spoke of reining in “the excesses of capitalism” so that “rich people are still rich” but they’re supposedly “giving a little bit back” he joked. Yeah, that sounds like “Hope” and “Change We Can Believe In” doesn’t it? This man turned out to be one of the biggest frauds to come along in sometime and the sheeple outright fell for him, and still do. That’s the way brainwashing works. Then Obama said, “I should add, by the way, right now I’m actually surprised by how much money I got, and let me tell you something: I don’t have half as much as most of these folks or a tenth or a hundredth. There’s only so much you can eat. There’s only so big a house you can have. There’s only so many nice trips you can take. I mean, it’s enough.” Really? Money and materialism seem to be his focus. I’m surprised he didn’t mention his and Michelle’s $65 MILLION book deal. What could anyone say in a book that’s worth that amount of dinero/money? I suppose all the “Democratic” Party Cultists would buy that to hang on every word from their messiah. I wouldn’t read it if you bought me a copy. But isn’t all this wonderful? How heart-warming to hear such bougi drivel. Arrogant, wealthy and people with big heads don’t interest me at all. Yes, with the bougi elite it’s all about their wealth, so I guess Obama has not been paying close attention to what’s really been happening.

And Michelle and George W Bush have become quite the item. Good lord! This woman seems to have a major attraction for war criminals.

Mi amigo/My friend said he read a comment from a brainwashed “Democratic” Party Cultist where she was saying, “Obama makes me so proud to be an American.” (roll eyes) And why is that? What a stupid and shallow thing to say. Oh yes, I know you just adore your god Obama don’t you? Such a good little Obama boot licker. The worship and glorification of god Obama. Even though you probably don’t have a clue what he did in office. Most of the Obama Cultists/Obamabots lived in a coma of denial during his 8 years in office. They didn’t care what he was doing. He had a D next to his name for “Democrat” and that’s all that mattered to the brainwashed “Democratic” Party Cultists. Their thinking was: “Obama’s wars are perfectly fine. War is only bad when there is a Republican in office.” And one being “proud” to be living in the hemisphere called the Americas or specifically in the United States of America should have nothing to do with any politician. One should think of oneself as a citizen of the Earth rather than from any arbitrary geographic borders, and I guess this person agreed with what neocon, right-wing George W Bush did since Obama mostly did the same thing and expanded much of what Bush did. But you know, I suspect that this brainwashed partisan doesn’t have a clue what Obama did. She was merely regurgitating her “Democratic” Party Cultist brainwashing along with ugly nationalism. Chau.—el barrio rosa

Related:

Attorney Michael Avenatti for US president in 2020 ?

How to respond to “Democratic” Party Cultists

Whose Fault for the US Supreme Court?

US Democratic Party front sites moving to the right by sanitising their language

——————-
1 Although they are critical of Feinstein out of one side of their mouth, out of the other side of their mouth some of the “Democratic” Party Cultists rush to defend Feinstein by trying to imply that her years of political experience in the Senate override or are more important than her lack of a law degree or legal training. Oh stop! WTF? I swear, some partisans love to embarrass themselves by stooping to any level to try to defend their basura politicians. I’m well aware of her years of political experience and her often Republican-enabling voting record and especially her sitting on committees where she had “influence” over war-profiteering with her husband’s, Richard Blum’s company. [Source]:

“Feinstein’s political fortunes rest not on representing the human rights values of her base in San Francisco, but on the considerable fortune of her husband, investment banker Richard Blum. This fortune, although technically separated from hers by various trusts, has been greatly enhanced by the war on terror. Blum’s war profiteering is anchored by his Blum Capital group, which owns major defense contractor URS. Blum also has ownership interest in a defunct cargo airline with defense department contracts, Astar Cargo, and a major construction firm with major contracts for the military as well as civilian reconstruction contracts with Iraq.”

I’ve also had the misfortune of hearing her say in hearings that she doesn’t have a law degree or any legal training “but as best I can understand you….” She wouldn’t be spouting that if she had legal training. I’ve not heard Senator Kamala Harris say that. She earned her Juris Doctor (J.D.) degree from the University of California Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco.

For your search engine:

War brings business to Feinstein spouse / Blum’s firms win multimillion-dollar defense contracts in Iraq, Afghanistan

6 comments on “It’s too close to the end of his term for impeachment.

  1. Queer boi

    I’ve been hanging out on a few political sites to check out where people’s heads are. These are the sites that you call fake-progressive. You’ve got that damn right! I used to hang out on these sites when Bush II was in office. The one thing I noticed was how conservative the progressives, oooop, I meant to type fake-progressives as you call them have become. They are so pro-establishment. They’re talking about supporting Biden in 2020. They refer to the orange nazi as “President” and they write it like that followed by his name. These are the same people who wrote “resident Bush.” Such a different time. Really turned me off to see commenters change so much towards the right. Love your article BTW. I can tell you right now that NOBODY on those sites would agree with anything you wrote in this article. They’re too far to the right as they go on about how progressive they are. Charlatans.

  2. political junkie

    there’s a mention of “the sexist sep cult” in your article. that made me smile when i read that because it perfectly describes them. i’ve come to outright detest them and their smug sexist, one track mind class-based commenters. all their articles about sexual assault are written by white males where it’s all about the democratic party. i’m the first to be in the anti-democratic party cue, but i have to say that it’s not all about the democratic party. sheesh. why do they have such simplistic class-based views on complicated issues? it’s as if they’re too lazy to work with what they have which is complication. Complicated issues cannot all be boiled down to class, and what class are the people who are in hospitals the rest of their life? What class is a baby? The first woman who came out against brett kavanaugh they slammed as “upper middle class.” What basis do they use for that? Have they seen her financials? Like I said, I detest them and stopped reading their site. I’ve got their drift on sexual assault. They will always slam the woman and say “this was from _______ years ago” meaning it’s not credible.

    1. D8

      Been reading….just haven’t felt like commenting.

      There was a time that I held the SEP in high regard. Not any more. But I have to say that they’ve really gone off the deep end and shown themselves for who they are. Add me to the “Detest” list too. I never knew they were so sexist and so wrapped up in class, so dismissive of women and like you say the women over there are their own worst enemies. I stopped going there because each time I left feeling very annoyed at what I was reading. Unless you’re a conservative white guy or a sexist female and say “I’m on the left,” I think anyone else will find them very offensive and a waste of one’s valuable time….I know I do.

      Thanks for this article, pb.

  3. FedUp!

    Pleased you wrote this article. Believe it or not, I have talked with people in the U.S. who did not know that the Senate is part of Congress. When I tried to clarify this for them in conversations, they asked me “Why do people say Congress and Senate then?” Just like you wrote, people who aren’t well educated hear that and think that the Senate is some nebulous body outside of Congress. Not sure where they think it is and I don’t push it to embarrass them further but I very much relate to what you wrote. I’ve had more people than I care to mention be confused on this.

  4. Helen

    I’m the former school teacher you mentioned. Thanks for the mention and for what you wrote about the Congress. It cannot be overstated. Yesterday someone on the politics forum I was on referred to Senator Kamala Harris as a Congresswoman. Someone came along and said she is a Senator, not a Congresswoman. Of course she is both since, as you say, the Senate is part of the Congress. Anyone in the Congress – House or Senate – is a Congressperson. I’m so saddened for our failing education system. At least you were well-educated and had a good teacher who taught you this. Thanks again. I appreciate your article.

    1. E in Sunnyvale

      I never understood the disconnect people seem to have with this either. But if nothing else, it’s stripping the word “Representative” from its association with our gov’t; fitting, since it’s anything but representative.

Fin. The End.