The Orange Man and his supporters hate the US

Hola a todos. I’ve never seen anything like it, I don’t think any of us have, and it’s getting worse by the day. I don’t usually talk about politics since I prefer to keep my blood pressure in a healthy range, but I feel the need to make mention of this.

There’s a belligerent, out-of-control bullying child with major violent-based mental issues in an adult body en la casa blanca/in the White House. For anyone who has been paying even reasonably close attention since El Hombre Naranja/The Orange Man took up occupancy en la casa blanca after somehow winning the electoral college vote but losing the popular vote — and to his rabid supporters: No, I’m not “sulking” because Queen Hillary was not s-elected since I didn’t support her — one knows that El Hombre Naranja is quickly dismantling the US, its laws and regulations which is indicative of his strong, deep-seated hate for this country and his determination to drastically change it over the next 8 years, which he has already started doing. I can hear the denialists say, “He’ll never be re-elected.” I would like to point out that it was the denialists who said he would never be “elected” in the first place. That’s why I wrote this article: ¿El Hombre Naranja Presidente? during the septic 2016 campaign. But yes, he can easily be “re-elected” (wink, wink) in our corrupt and sham of a system. What he’s doing includes such things as rolling back clean water protections, as well as the latest death bill to repeal Obamacare — Obama’s corporate bail-out to the mangled “Health Care” Industrial Complex — where millions of people will lose their outrageously expensive “health care” coverage.

El Hombre Naranja is continuing the global barbaric US imperialism of the Bush-Obama regimes, which he campaigned against. Just like with Obama, El Hombre Naranja/The Orange Man couldn’t wait to start killing innocent people. How many people has he killed so far? He claims to be a Christian (don’t they all?) but missed the commandment in the bible about, “Thou Shalt Not Kill.” It’s a pretty straight-forward four-word commandment. What part of that does he not understand? And despite his claim to be a Christian, he certainly doesn’t show it in his daily life. He doesn’t set the examples of Jesus, from what we’ve been told about Jesus from scholared people. El Hombre Naranja is one of the fake — what I call — “Christmas and Easter Christians.” They are the so-called Christians who only show up at a church twice a year on a special occasion. He’s merely using Christianity to “play” the far-right evangelicals. Not being the brightest people, they seem to have fallen for him. On Sunday mornings when this fake-Christian should be in church he’s wasting his time playing on Twi**e* bullying and insulting the corporate media and others.

His stupid supporters will be affected by his dismantling of this country but they’re too thick to understand that. They really are among the most stupid people we have in the US. One recent example of that is that some of his supporters were interviewed recently by a major East Coast news site after El Hombre Naranja had a campaign rally — for those who haven’t been paying close attention, he’s holding unprecedented campaign rallies for his 2020 re-election after only 5 months in office of his first term, as of this writing. His supporters told the reporter that:

“Finally, AmerrrrrrrrrrriKKKa is highly regarded all around the world.”

¿Qué? What?

Which América are they talking about? I will have to assume they are talking about:

1. América del Sur or South América as being highly regarded all around the world, or
2. América Central (Central América).

They can’t possibly be talking about The Cesspool/Los Estados Unidos or the United States of América.

A brief aside: I get so tired of people calling this country (the US) “America.” Why? Because “America” is the name of the entire hemisphere. Someone may say, “But everybody does it. Everybody calls the US ‘America.’” Just because “everybody does it,” that makes it right? As my many Latino/Hispano amigos/amigas often astutely say: “the US is a country with no name.” It’s officially known as the ‘United States of América.’” What they mean by that is that the US does not have a name like any other countries, such as: México, Colombia, Brazil, Argentina, España, Guatemala, Honduras, Britain, France, Greece, China, and many others. The US is a group of forty-nine continuous states in the hemisphere called América. They are technically in América del Norte or North América. Nobody ever had the intelligence to come up with a name for this country, so the “United States of America” ended up being the name of the country. And those 49 states are “united” by being next to each other and officially comprise the country. The fiftieth state, Hawaii, is legally part of the United States but is not in the hemisphere called América, so people in Hawaii cannot say they are Americanos or “Americans.” At one time, people in Europe referred to this country as “the States,” which is cool. That’s what they are: States. But I’ve noticed that they too in Europe are now using the word “America.” I don’t expect to change one mind by what I’m saying here and I expect most people, if not everyone, will continue using the language they currently use. In the past, when I’ve brought this up on message forums, I was met with 100% resistance, especially from the conservatives/far-right. This is just one of our pet peeves, in part, because it’s sloppy language: Calling a country the name of the hemisphere is rather ridiculous. And we don’t understand why people insist on using the word “America” when “US” (just two letters) is so much easier to type. Canada had the intelligent to choose a name for their country. They could call themselves “America” too since they are in América, North América, specifically. México could call themselves América too — hearing that should really piss off the anti-immigrant basura among us — because México is in North América. If one travels a bit throughout the Américas (especially throughout América del Sur), one knows that people there refer to themselves as Americanos and they very much resent the US and US’ans arrogantly thinking that they own the word “América” and are the only Americanos in the hemisphere.

Therefore, if the stupid disciples of El Hombre Naranja are talking about the United States of América, they are highly mistaken because the US is not at all highly regarded all around the world now under El Hombre Naranja. Apparently they missed all the noticias/news about how badly things went with his recent international trip where he met with other world leaders, including his awkward meetings with German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Or was all of that considered “fake news” to his stupid supporters? To them, any noticias that is not positive of their messiah El Hombre Naranja, is “fake news.” Did the misogynistic, sexist, racist, redneck (El Hombre Naranja) pronounce Angela Merkel’s name correctly when he met her? I suspect not. Her name is not an English name nor is it correctly pronounced as such. As was expected before he left, he was embarrassing on his international trip.

El hombre/The man is a constantly angry-looking embarrassment, especially his latest multi-day (as of this writing) juvenile attack on the two co-hosts of a corporate media morning show. Then he incited violence with a message he wrote on 140 character Twi**e* (the site he lives on) of a juvenile fake wrestling video of him violently body-slamming/beating up another corporate media network which he has a major hard-on for, calling them “fraud news.” Not at all presidential. That’s the behaviour of an out-of-control internet troll. The type that “lives in his mother’s basement” to use their own script back at them.

This man-child is sick. But his proudly willfully-ignorant supporters say they don’t care what the rest of el mundo/the world thinks about him or the US. A really stupid thing to say. They fail to understand the many ramifications and consequences of such lack of credibility and world respect.

El Hombre Naranja has quite an obsession going on with Mr Nobel Peace Prize Obama (who left office with 8 wars in progress). That obsession is unprecedented too. El Hombre Naranja is constantly bullying Obama and dismantling much of what Obama did. I don’t know if Obama has noticed the bullying since Obama’s been too busy luxuriating and partying with Oprah and Hollywood celebrities. I read that Oprah is considering running for president in 2020. Oh yes why not! The era of wealthy corporate media celebrities running for president. Obama received a $400,000 speaking fee and he and Ms Obama signed a millionaire-dollar book deal after leaving office. The Obamas have been busy buying a $8.1 million mansion (Dahling) in the District of Columbia (the District), in Upper Northwest. It’s the same house they rented for awhile. It’s a very small house with only 8,200 sq. ft. and just 9.5 bathrooms. Can someone tell me why they need nine and one-half bathrooms for four people? Even if all four of them are in a bathroom at the same time, there are 5.5 bathrooms left over. And even if they have 5 guests staying with them, will all 5 guests be in a separate bathroom at the same time? I’d like to see that! Well no I wouldn’t really. I just find it rather wasteful and pretentious. Nobody needs 9.5 bathrooms for four people. What is wrong with people? Well, this is all about status and trying to impress other shallow people who are easily impressed by wealth and materialistic garbage. I can hear the employees at the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority saying, “Watch out, here it comes, all 9.5 bathrooms of the Obama mansion in Upper Northwest just flushed their toilets.” The Obama’s neighbours include some relatives of El Hombre Naranja, and the billionaire founder of Am*z*n. How wonderful that the bougi and wealthy can all be together luxuriating (Dahling). The Obama’s house looks rather sterile inside with mostly conformist all-white, gray, black interiors. Nothing remotely “rad.” But then I wouldn’t expect anything “rad” from the Obamas. The very typical conservative and boring/bland conformist colours of today. Very little colour at all really. Another example of wealthy people with absolutely no taste. Mi amigo/My friend (who was a very successful and in demand building contractor, now retired) saw the pictures of the house interior and said, “It’s hideously ugly inside. There’s so much that could be done with that house, especially with beautiful colours.” I would describe their house as pretentious, bougi and elitist. It doesn’t look at all “warm” or welcoming at all. It looks more like a corporate showroom. There’s also a two-car garage and outdoor parking for 10 vehicles. How environmental. I take it they don’t use public transport (the Metrobus or the District’s Metro). One wonders where they got that dinero/money since the office of president doesn’t pay anywhere close to $8.1 million. The Obamas say they plan to spend another 2.5 years in the District — WHY? So he can run for yet another office to continue his and her head trip about how, “We Obamas are so very important to The People. The People desperately want us to run for yet another office. They can’t get enough of us very important people. We’re now celebrities and we adore the celebrity attention they give us” — yet I had read they were going to live in Palm Springs. What happened to that? Couldn’t get the celebrity attention there? Other than what I’ve said here about them, I’ve given no thought to the Obamas. I was hoping they would just go away the way former presidents have. I only looked into the details of their new house because I thought readers might find it interesting. He’s out of office so why give him any thought? He’s as corrupt as all the others. Most presidents rarely mention former presidents and what they did. But this off-the-latch guy, El Hombre Naranja, is not like any president we’ve ever had before, nor is he like illegitimate George W Bush.

El Hombre Naranja is not presidential material. I suspect most people have figured that out by now. He remains the obnoxious, ignorant blow-hard he was during the 2016 campaign: an out-of-control, angry, cruel, extremely immature bully constantly thriving on dysfunction and attention. He’s an ill-mannered, uncivil, ill-behaved, narcissistic child is an overweight adult body. He doesn’t believe in exercise and he enjoys eating lots of dead animals with ketchup on them. And at least one of his sons is just as unhinged and juvenile. His rabid supporters are just like him. Like attracts like. I know from personal experience with the basura on message forums. I would suggest intense psycho-dynamic psychotherapy to El Hombre Naranja, but I don’t think even the most credible doctorate-level therapist could do anything with him. Some people are beyond help, and to get help the person has to want help, and in this instance El Hombre Naranja thinks he knows it all. He would quickly dismiss anything from a therapist as “fake news.”

El Hombre Naranja is constantly lying and making up his own set of “facts” as he goes. His early-morning — midnight and thereafter when most people on the East Coast are asleep — routine of trolling/ranting on Twi**e* has become legendary. I don’t know why Twi**e* doesn’t close his account since he has already incited violence on their platform, but I suspect they love the attention he gives them. He’s finally made them somewhat relevant. The corporate media network he attacked contacted Twi**e* and they said he did not violate their policies because there are many ways to interpret what he did. How mealy-mouthed of them. And when someone is specifically inciting violence as he did, shouldn’t that be enough to suspend his account? I bet if you or I had put the same thing on Twi**e*, there wouldn’t have been “many ways to interpret it.” Our account would have been suspended immediately. But one should expect the techie basura to eat the ass of The Orange Man. As expected, the supporters of El Hombre Naranja have defended his inciting of violence on Twi**e*. They claim that other presidents have also incited violence, so in their mind — the word “mind” used advisedly — that makes what he did right. Even if other presidents did incite violence, the fools never learned that “two wrongs don’t make a right.” I thought that was something that most people learned in elementary school. But one gets the distinct impression that the minions of El Hombre Naranja never went to any school.

Then to see the injustices of the US Supreme Court bow to him in their 9-0 ruling on the Muslim travel ban was disgraceful. The next time you hear the Democrats scream: “Remember the Supreme Court! Remember the Supreme Court!” as their #1 reason for voting for their corporate and imperialistic presidential nominee, remind them of this ruling — and most likely future rulings — because the so-called “liberals,” everyone of them on that court — Democratic appointees Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer — voted with the conservatives and bowed to El Führer/El Hombre Naraja, as I predict they will do in the future. Why wouldn’t they? The Democrats and so-called “liberals” (fake-liberals/fake-progressives) often work for los Republicanos. They work for their corporate owners. Where are the Democratic Party sheeple now on this Supreme Court ruling? Silent. Because just like the disciples of El Hombre Naranja, the Democrats inherently think they can’t criticise their own. They are as thin-skinned as the know-nothing supporters of El Hombre Naranja. The Democrats should also stop telling people: “You have to vote; every vote counts” and how important it is to vote in this thoroughly corrupt sham of a system. Because if every vote counted, Hillary wouldn’t be spending her days sitting at home since la mujer/the woman received 3 MILLION more votes (that we know of) than did El Hombre Naranja.

Also, The regime of El Hombre Naranja did not honour Queer/GTLBQ Pride Month in junio/June 2017, which should come as no shock to anyone who paid attention during the septic 2016 presidential campaign. These are anti-Queer/GTLBQ people. Earlier this year I remember commenting with a rabid supporter of The Orange Man and the person claimed to be a Queer guy with a partner. They had fallen for The Orange Man’s stunt when he held of a Rainbow Flag (upside down) during the campaign. That’s all they needed to see to believe in him. I wish I could remember the details of that, but it was not how it appeared, I read later. In other words, he wasn’t holding the Rainbow Flag to show that he was pro-Queer. But it mattered not what I said and evidence to the contrary, the allegedly-Queer guy I was commenting with and his partner were going to believe that El Hombre Naranja loves them as a Queer couple. I even pointed out that The Orange Man’s nominee to the US Supreme Court — who now sits on that court — said that it should be illegal for gay people to have sex. That didn’t phase this guy either. He chose Denial. But in the end, I felt I had been trolled by one of his rabid supporters and that the person I was commenting with was not Queer at all and there was no partner. He was just trying to convert me. Although I’m well aware that there are some GTLBQs who support El Hombre Naranja. That would have to be from a position of self-hate and internalised homophobia.

It looks like El Hombre Naranja may not be going to the UK after all. Good. What an international embarrassment that would be. The Queen said nothing about it in The Queen’s Speech at the opening of Parliament 2017 following the snap election, although she mentioned other guests who would be visiting in the coming year, but he wasn’t one of them.

As I said earlier, this man dysfunctional and out-of-control child in a man’s body is already campaigning for 2020. He’s already held a re-election campaign fundraiser dinner which cost $35,000 plate at his own hotel in the District. He’s having a fundraiser for the GOP — again at his hotel in the District; isn’t that a conflict of interest? — which is expected to raise $10 million USD.

From reading the few trite and juvenile comments I’ve been able to read recently from his nasty supporters, the disciples of El Hombre Naranja are continuing to call anyone who oppose their messiah a “snowflake” and that’s written in their very patronising trollish style. Their behaviour mirrors that of the Obamabots after he took office, although the Obamabots didn’t use the term “snowflake.” But the behavior of blind devotion and blinders-on unconditional support for their new-found messiah figure is exactly the same as what the Obamabots did. The disciples of El Hombre Naranja are also frequently talking about how they’re “winning” as if they’re cheering a team in a corporate spectator sports event. All of this “winning” they claim to be doing. They also live under the false illusion that all Democrats are “liberals,” which they must have picked up from some very ignorant, far-right overpaid gas bag parked at a microphone (they’re typically called talk show hosts). The notion that all Democrats are liberal is of course ludicrous, and in their simple minds anyone who opposes El Hombre Naranja is a Democrat. That’s not true either. I know someone who is a staunch Republican who can’t stand him, but explaining that to them would be beyond them.

El Hombre Naranja wrote in el 3 de julio de 2017/3 July 2017 message on Twi**e* that, “America’s men & women in uniform is [sic] the story of FREEDOM overcoming OPPRESSION…” That’s the lying propaganda that the far-right nationalists consistently spew. And he’s against freedom. He’s for oppression. What remaining freedoms we have are guaranteed in the US Constitution, not in people wearing uniforms of the barbaric Military Industrial Complex. Our freedoms, again, guaranteed in the Constitution have nothing to do with rank US imperialism and barbarism. When The Cesspool/the US goes to war or launches another terrorist attack on a sovereign nation, it is not to protect the US Constitution, but rather it’s for US hegemony and Empire building of the PNAC agenda.

I read while writing this article that he’s making the mistake of playing solely to his base. And his base cheers for and serves as obedient bootlickers for anything and all things he does, no matter how outrageous, heinous and childish. The children in adult bodies are right there supporting him. The problem with this is that his base is very small. According to all research, including polls, his base is just a small group of Republican voters. Mi amigo said his base is mainly the Alex Jones crowd. But it is clear that he and his base hate the US. His supporters desperately want the US turned into a dictatorship. Wouldn’t it be a bit easier and faster for them to move to a country that currently has a dictatorship? But at the rate we’re going — especially with his constant attacks on the “the press” and corporate media destroying what little remains of our First Amendment rights — installing a dictatorship in the US shouldn’t take long. Chau.—el barrio rosa

The 14 Defining Characteristics Of Fascism

Powerful and continuing nationalism
Disdain for human rights
Identification of enemies as a unifying cause
Supremacy of the military
Rampant sexism/Anti-Queer agenda
Controlled mass media
Obsession with national security
Religion and government intertwined
Corporate power protected
Labor power suppressed
Disdain for intellectuals & the arts
Obsession with crime & punishment
Rampany cronyism & corruption
Fradulent elections

[Note: In the comments, please do not use The Orange Man’s real name. If you do (even by mistake), your comment will go into the spam filter where I will edit it out, and then post your comment. From hereon, I don’t want that man’s child’s name polluting mi diario/my diary: pink barrio. I don’t want his real name on my site. Muchas Gracias a todos.]


The US is not “America”

10 comments on “The Orange Man and his supporters hate the US

  1. Queer boi

    Random thought………..

    The orange man’s supporters don’t know the Declaration of Independence when they hear it. They think it’s propaganda. As pb often says, “stupid is in.”

    It was 122 degrees today in Palm Springs. No climate problems.

    Woodland Hills expected to have consecutive days of record heat of 112 degrees over next several days.

    Liked your article, pb. Thx.

  2. District Resident

    I’d like to share this with you:

    The orange man:
    Fragile ego.

    1. el barrio rosa Post author

      Hola District Resident, gracias for that. How are things in the District? I read about that nauseating event the other night at the Kennedy Center Concert Hall. At first, I thought it was the Choral Arts Society of Washington (that I sang with) sitting on the stage with members of the National Symphony Orchestra which concerned me that they would do that, but the CASW Chorus doesn’t dress quite like the one that was there. I knew it wasn’t The Washington Chorus or the University of Maryland Concert Choir. Would the NSO do that? (I was thinking). It turned out to be some Baptist church choir and orchestra from Texas with The Orange Man on stage once again craving attention with this gigantic US flag hanging in front of the Filene Center organ pipes in the back of the stage. Gracias to all for your comments. Chau.

      1. District Resident

        Hola pink barrio, gracias for your response. Things were all right here until you know who showed up. I wasn’t too keen on Obama but at least when he was in 1400 Pennsylvania Ave we had an adult there and somebody who *acted* presidential. Awhile back Mayor Bowser met with him to talk about DC statehood and more funding for the Metro. Many District residents were saying among ourselves – “Did he have any idea what she was talking about???” We are really in the shits with no way out even if he’s impeached nothing will change and probably get worse as another commenter wrote. I overheard a guy on the Metro talking about thinking of moving out of the District to get as far away from the Orange Man as possible. His friend asked where he would go and he said California. His friend said you’d still be in the U.S. I read about the people who have left the U.S. and gone to Canada and they’re having a problem. They’re in legal limbo because of it. Don’t have details on that.

        1. Wes in Arlington

          ” Many District residents were saying among ourselves – “Did he have any idea what she was talking about???”

          Hello neighbor. Some of us over in Arlington were asking the same. Does he know what the District of Columbia is and does he know that he’s living there, and his hotel is there?

          He’s as stupid as the loyalist cult that supports him.

          pb, thanks for your article and for the tidbit about the Obama mansion. Sheesh! That’s a bit excessive.

        2. California Poppies

          I’m responding to District Resident,

          Hi, I have lived in the District and really enjoyed it there, and have been all over the United States both living and visiting. California is different in a very progressive way. We are extremely crowded but the western states are different than the rest of the US, and California is even further to the progressive side than all of it. A lot of us can’t wait to succeed from “The Cesspool” as pink barrio accurately describes it. Every time I see or hear that orange head I shut the damn thing off as quickly as possible. He makes me want to puke.

  3. FedUp!

    Excellent article. Esp like your comment about the Supreme Court and the part about America. That’s been brainwashed into people so that’s why you get the resistance.

  4. D8

    Yes we are fucked like Alejandro says. Notice you said nothing about impeachment for good reason. That looks like a long shot. I think it would be a long shot even if the Dems had the majority in congress…. I sort of get the sense they like him. If he’s impeached there’s someone even possibly worse waiting in the wings because the other fellow is more slickly packaged, “seems more presidential.” What needs to happen is the entire cabal needs to go and we start over.

    I read that Hillary walked into a Broadway theater and the crowd went crazy and gave her a standing ovation. good gawd. I’m afraid I don’t understand that, other than that’s what one expects of partisans and like you say their celebrity politicians. I got the impression she was greeted like a rock star.

    Meant to thank you for your kind response to me on the other article – about my former acquaintance. Appreciated that very much. :-)

    1. San Francisco Resident

      Liked your Hillary comment –

      I too wondered how anyone could support Hillary clinton. You have to almost wonder if this wasn’t staged filling the theater with her cult. What would there be to cheer Hillary about? What exactly has she done to get so excited about her? (That’s what I thought — dead air. Thank you for your call).

      Thanks for your good article.

  5. Alejandro

    Hoooooooooooooola. I knew some of that but not all. We’re fucked.

    Muchas gracias for the education on América. I and my relatives down south feel just as you.

    Gracias y saludos.

Fin. The End.